San Jose Sharks - The art of losing

CaptainShark

Registered User
Sep 25, 2004
4,454
3,023
Fulda, Germany
The Sharks are 1-8-1 in their last ten games.

During 6 of their last 7 losses, they had a lead at some point in the 3rd period and managed to get only 1 point out of those games.

At first I was okay with the results as a lottery pick helps us big time long term, while the team still looks somewhat competitive on most nights.

Lately it’s frustrating and I think the team is getting frustrated as well, especially #71 is showing signs of frustration.

Anyhow, if you wanna make a lot of bucks, just wait till the Sharks have a 3rd period lead and bet on a loss…
 

KrisLetAngry

MrJukeBoy
Dec 20, 2013
19,311
5,486
Saskatchewan
The Sharks are 1-8-1 in their last ten games.

During 6 of their last 7 losses, they had a lead at some point in the 3rd period and managed to get only 1 point out of those games.

At first I was okay with the results as a lottery pick helps us big time long term, while the team still looks somewhat competitive on most nights.

Lately it’s frustrating and I think the team is getting frustrated as well, especially #71 is showing signs of frustration.

Anyhow, if you wanna make a lot of bucks, just wait till the Sharks have a 3rd period lead and bet on a loss…
Losing sucks.

Tanking to completely bottom out. It's rough on players.

Edmonton took Draisaitl and McDavid

Buffalo is still dead.
 

Puckstop40

Registered User
Aug 23, 2009
9,245
7,393
Las Vegas, NV
I saw the score and told myself, he is inevitable. Definitely going to take some time to right the ship in San Jose but their prospects are showing some promise.
 

olli

Least biased user
Dec 2, 2016
3,900
2,171
Canada
The Sharks are 1-8-1 in their last ten games.

During 6 of their last 7 losses, they had a lead at some point in the 3rd period and managed to get only 1 point out of those games.

At first I was okay with the results as a lottery pick helps us big time long term, while the team still looks somewhat competitive on most nights.

Lately it’s frustrating and I think the team is getting frustrated as well, especially #71 is showing signs of frustration.

Anyhow, if you wanna make a lot of bucks, just wait till the Sharks have a 3rd period lead and bet on a loss…
I generally stay away from sports betting but I was kicking myself for not betting against the sharks when they were up a goal in some of their most recent games
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainShark

Bruce Granville

Registered User
Oct 11, 2014
5,980
4,724
I didn‘t watch the last period because I fell asleep….as did the Sharks.
I wondered how you can turn a PP and a one goal lead into a loss within half a minute…
I had forgotten about Georgsieve. I guess Fourgieve won‘t cut it any longer…
 
Last edited:

John Mandalorian

2022 Avs: The First Dance
Nov 29, 2018
11,990
7,737
Losing sucks.

Tanking to completely bottom out. It's rough on players.

Edmonton took Draisaitl and McDavid

Buffalo is still dead.

They should bring back the greatness that is Patrick Marleau (aka > Gordie Howe) for one more game.
 
Last edited:

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
19,163
22,377
Vegass
I’ve been told that things like “morale” and “culture” aren’t a real thing according to the sharks board. I’ve also been told Georgiev wasn’t brought in to help tank.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leafshater67

amnesiac

Space Oddity
Jul 10, 2010
14,592
8,670
Montreal
they knew damn well what they were doing by taking Georgiev. Its still early in the rebuild and they should still be going for high picks in the draft.

but rebuilds can take a full decade, and you usually need several high picks to build that true contender. Theyre doing it right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coooldude

Shark Finn

uɐℲ ɥʇ8 ,sǝıddn⅁
Jan 5, 2012
3,066
3,483
Herwood
The glass half-full version of this is that the Sharks will likely get a great player in the draft despite the fact that the team has shown signs of being very competitive.

Most teams competing for that pick historically suck in all three periods of the game.
That was the tale of the tide last season for the Sharks, so they're definitely going in the right direction for the time being.
 

matt trick

Registered User
Jun 12, 2007
10,300
2,542
Ideal for the team to lose and be competitive. We’ve played a brutal 6 game stretch. However, losing like this has to be brutal.

We had to take back Georgiev to get good value on Blackwood, I knew this would be required, and Blackwood rightly assessed his market- we couldn’t keep him. Grier was right to move on. However, the team needs to move on from Georgiev as soon as Vanecek is back. Hand Askarov the lions share of the starts for the next two weeks. If Vanecek can play okay, Georgiev can back him up. If they both suck, or Asky is dominant, you turn the team over to Askarov.

Should we move on from Granlund, Ceci, Sturm, Rutta, and Kunin the team will be dramatically worse. Graf, Gushchin, Vlasic, and Cardwell will be the replacements. Yikes, even if Asky plays out of his mind that’ll be a rough 20 games.

I also might try and steal Primeau off waivers and assign to the AHL (if the Habs don’t claim him back). We’re going to need a fourth goalie, and at least he’s young.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BHD

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad