Prospect Info: San Jose Sharks #4 Prospect

Who is the #4 prospect for the Sharks?

  • Luca Cagnoni

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Leo Sahlin-Wallenius

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ethan Cardwell

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Collin Graf

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jack Thompson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jake Furlong

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yegor Rimashevsky

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Colton Roberts

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Eric Pohlkamp

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mattias Havelid

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Magnus Chrona

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Georgi Romanov

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Christian Kirsch

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yaroslav Korostelyov

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Carson Wetsch

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • David Klee

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nate Misskey

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cam Lund

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Theo Jacobsson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Resse Laubach

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Brandon Svoboda

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Brandon Coe

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tristen Robins

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Axel Landen

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Gannon Laroque

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    114
  • Poll closed .

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
16,475
18,528
Vegass
I actually took Edstrom. I think what he does has a greater path to the NHL as the 3C. Musty and Halt I'm hesitant until it's above OHL.
 

ChompChomp

Can't wait for Sharks hockey to return someday
Jan 8, 2007
11,359
2,140
El Paso, TX
I'm the lone Chern vote. I think of who is in development now with the Sharks, he's got the most upside and potential after Celebrini, Smith and Dickinson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

timorous me

Gristled Veteran
Apr 14, 2010
2,025
3,266
Went with Musty for his upside, but I like Mukh’s floor. Could have gone either way with this one.
I really like Musty but I decided to go with Mukhamadullin as well. I think he showed enough last season to make it pretty clear to me that he's a top-four defenseman in the future and I would be happy to see him get a shot to prove that on a regular basis this year.

Musty is in a tough situation in terms of where he plays and how he'll develop this coming season, but I'm still very excited by him and have big-time hopes for his future. This is more just wanting to give Shak some love since I think he won't get as much as he should (he's not home-grown and he's not as exciting of a prospect).
 

gaucholoco3

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
1,106
1,389
I went with Muk even though I think Musty has the higher raw ceiling.

I think Musty can be a Guentzel (90-100 point 1st line wing) where as Muk’s ceiling is a high end #3.
 

llamanby

Registered User
Mar 19, 2006
357
105
Muk is a NHLer this year and been playing against men for 4-5 years.

Musty is the exciting flashy junior player that will be in juniors again. Doesnt have the pedigree of someone like Dickinson so he gets bumped by Muk.

Give me the solid 2nd pair dman over the winger who has a huge range of possible outcomes.
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
48,809
20,180
Bay Area
I’ve listed Musty higher on my lists recently but I decided to go with Mukhamadullin on this one. More valuable position, significantly less risk even though I do love Musty and think his ceiling is sky-high.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Jargon

Registered User
Apr 12, 2011
6,029
10,550
Venice, California
Muhk played a bit in the NHL and had a good year in the AHL - he’s likely winning a spot next year and is much further along than most of our prospects. I think his “everything goes right” ceiling is a #2, which I think makes him the winner here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Patty Ice

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
14,172
4,008
Not California
I’ve listed Musty higher on my lists recently but I decided to go with Mukhamadullin on this one. More valuable position, significantly less risk even though I do love Musty and think his ceiling is sky-high.


1000004072.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: landshark

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad