You know the drill. Age cutoff 25, NHL games played cutoff 40. Poll will close after 2 days unless the results are incredibly lopsided.
1. Macklin Celebrini ~95%
2. Will Smith ~90%
1. Macklin Celebrini ~95%
2. Will Smith ~90%
I think you could argue for Mukhamadullin over Musty.This really isn't going to get interesting until #5 when you can probably make a reasonable case for any of 3-5 guys in that spot. Dickinson has this locked up already and Musty probably coasts to the #4 rank.
?
Frankly I don't see the argument for Musty over Shak. If you think they're at all close a huge two-way defenseman trumps a one dimensional winger any day.I think you could argue for Mukhamadullin over Musty.
Slang term is big dick energy. Samuel Dickinson is large player who brings energy.?
I feel like I remember seeing this go by on draft day. Can't recall the context...
Ah! Thanks! I think we need to be careful with this guy's nicknames given the compound word nature of Sammy's last name itself. (fixed your typo)Slang term is big dick energy. Samuel Dickinson is large player who brings energy.
Ugh fixed it. I actually just learned it is straight up Sam. No Samuel.Ah! Thanks! I think we need to be careful with this guy's nicknames given the compound word nature of Sammy's last name itself. (fixed your typo)
Ugh fixed it. I actually just learned it is straight up Sam. No Samuel.
I think the point totals from Musty and the fact he was actually drafted by the Sharks is why most put him above Shak. Musty will project to score a lot more and will end up making a lot more money (look at deals for Reinhart and Guentzel) but Shak will be the more important player for winning in the playoffs.Frankly I don't see the argument for Musty over Shak. If you think they're at all close a huge two-way defenseman trumps a one dimensional winger any day.
Well, that would be the argument. I think Musty has higher upside but more bust risk, so I would lean towards him. But I would definitely have time for someone who ranked Mukhamadullin higher because he’s safer, closer to being an impact player, and plays a more important position.Frankly I don't see the argument for Musty over Shak. If you think they're at all close a huge two-way defenseman trumps a one dimensional winger any day.
icky, sticky, mickey, or best of them all DICKIEs as in the pants.Ah! Thanks! I think we need to be careful with this guy's nicknames given the compound word nature of Sammy's last name itself. (fixed your typo)
Manny, Moe and Jack! They know what you're after!!D
icky, sticky, mickey, or best of them all DICKIEs as in the pants.
Dickies Painters Pants at Discounted Prices
Reminds me of the chant the Giants had going a few years back for Alex Dickerson:Ah! Thanks! I think we need to be careful with this guy's nicknames given the compound word nature of Sammy's last name itself. (fixed your typo)
That's why I got Mukh at 3 but it's very very close. Mukh is prettty close to coming in and will just immediately be a guy we stick on the 2nd pairing and have him be there for a long time. Musty's still a bit of a wildcard. Love the production and the vibes but he's got some rounding out as a pro to do.Well, that would be the argument. I think Musty has higher upside but more bust risk, so I would lean towards him. But I would definitely have time for someone who ranked Mukhamadullin higher because he’s safer, closer to being an impact player, and plays a more important position.