Player Discussion Sam "Dikembe" Montembeault

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I can see Monty for Holloway + 2nd + Campbell. For all of Soups troubles (and salary) all I read on the guy is that players love him, not the worst goalie to have as a back up or in the AHL.
Gotta b more….Edmonton is DESPERATE

MONTY for Holloway……sign me up
Campbell salary for 4yrs….thats Worth a 1st and 2nd

so…

Monty + 2024 3rd

for

Holloway, 2024 1st, 2025 2nd and Campbell
 
Holloway has not proven anything that shows he has potential. I would be weary of trading for him.
100% right, you’re going for potential and I believe the potential is there.

One could say that Monty hasn’t proven he’s worth that type of haul and that he could thrive as a #1 but that’s the chance EDMONTON would take.

We’ve done it with Dach, done it with Newhook….i believe reuniting Caufield and Holloway could pay off enormously.

It could also blow up in our faces….I’d roll the dice
 
  • Like
Reactions: themilosh and Tyson
Unless we're very confident in our goalie prospects, I'd keep Montembeault. He's hardly elite, but average goalies carry more currency than they did a few years ago. Quite a few teams are struggling because they can't find base-level reliable goaltending. Are we going to risk opening up a hole we can't easily fill?

Of course, if a GM overpays...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Walrus26
Unless we're very confident in our goalie prospects, I'd keep Montembeault. He's hardly elite, but average goalies carry more currency than they did a few years ago. Quite a few teams are struggling because they can't find base-level reliable goaltending. Are we going to risk opening up a hole we can't easily fill?

Of course, if a GM overpays...
Is he average behind a contending type of team?
I think he is well above average and it's perplexing to me how little respect he gets on this board.
 
Is he average behind a contending type of team?
I think he is well above average and it's perplexing to me how little respect he gets on this board.
I like Montembeault and am happy to be convinced he could thrive on a stronger team. I'd like to see a consistent full season before judging whether he's our future 1A.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyson
Gotta b more….Edmonton is DESPERATE

MONTY for Holloway……sign me up
Campbell salary for 4yrs….thats Worth a 1st and 2nd

so…

Monty + 2024 3rd

for

Holloway, 2024 1st, 2025 2nd and Campbell
so basically what I proposed but we need EDM 1st this year? Would EDM take that, I'm not so sure but ofc id be happy with it.

I do agree that Holloway is a very calculated risk (high reward, low risk prospect) and the perfect age for our core group.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaffy27
Unless we're very confident in our goalie prospects, I'd keep Montembeault. He's hardly elite, but average goalies carry more currency than they did a few years ago. Quite a few teams are struggling because they can't find base-level reliable goaltending. Are we going to risk opening up a hole we can't easily fill?

Of course, if a GM overpays...
I wouldn’t say goaltending is the most difficult hole to fill. Elite goalies are hard to come by and teams usually never trade them if they have them much like top line centres and D. But Montembault isn’t that. We literally got him off waivers. Goaltending shouldn’t be a position we struggle to fill unless we have boneheads running our team that can’t access talent when it comes to the position like Edmonton and Toronto.
 
I like Montembeault and am happy to be convinced he could thrive on a stronger team. I'd like to see a consistent full season before judging whether he's our future 1A.
That stronger team would not be Edmonton!
 
I wouldn’t say goaltending is the most difficult hole to fill. Elite goalies are hard to come by and teams usually never trade them if they have them much like top line centres and D. But Montembault isn’t that. We literally got him off waivers. Goaltending shouldn’t be a position we struggle to fill unless we have boneheads running our team that can’t access talent when it comes to the position like Edmonton and Toronto.
Montembeault was in the same situation Primeau finds himself in. The difference is Florida tried to sneak him through waivers whereas Hughes didn't want to risk losing Primeau.

I remember a throw away goalie, I think his name was Hasek. Just because a player is picked up off waivers doesn't mean they don't have upside.
 
Montembeault was in the same situation Primeau finds himself in. The difference is Florida tried to sneak him through waivers whereas Hughes didn't want to risk losing Primeau.

I remember a throw away goalie, I think his name was Hasek. Just because a player is picked up off waivers doesn't mean they don't have upside.
Montembault isn’t Hasek. Lol but I think that example only furthers the point that there’s a bunch of different ways to get a good goalie. Montembault has been a sub .900 goalie in every league he’s played in. He’s not someone I’m willing to take a risk on if the money doesn’t make sense. He’s also someone I hope Hughes finds a way to keep if he can. Especially in the era where most teams like to run a two goalie system.
 
Montembault isn’t Hasek. Lol but I think that example only furthers the point that there’s a bunch of different ways to get a good goalie. Montembault has been a sub .900 goalie in every league he’s played in. He’s not someone I’m willing to take a risk on if the money doesn’t make sense. He’s also someone I hope Hughes finds a way to keep if he can. Especially in the era where most teams like to run a two goalie system.
No one knew that back then did they regarding Hasek? I didn't say Monty was Hasek. We don't truly know Monty's upside
 
No one knew that back then did they regarding Hasek? I didn't say Monty was Hasek. We don't truly know Monty's upside
I think his upside is more or less what we’ve seen the last year and some change. A goalie whose good as long as you don’t overuse him. My opinion is we’re seeing his ceiling right now. Like I said, I’m all good with bringing back Montembault as long as he’s paid like somebody whose a 1b/backup. I’m not overpaying him for his services however.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyson

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad