Value of: Sam Bennett as a UFA

I didnt ask that.

I asked how are you going to pay him what other teams can? You refused to admit that you are going to lose pieces of this team if you are going to pay him.

THINGS WILL WORK OUT! lol

Whats Zitos plan that has been laid out in front of me?? You have no idea whos gunna be back with the team.
Lmao, nope. You asked how if we can afford him. For the millionth time simpleton, what team retains a big fish for what other teams will pay in FA??

I’ve never said we won’t lose guys, I said we won’t have to lose signed guys. Like Lindell. Again, you keep changing your question act like a dick when I say we can keep him for under market value. Figure yourself out, outline the question, then come back to me.
 
Only good thing about 35+ deals, the buyouts are better no?
So maybe Zito does 3 years but knows that 3rd year is buyout candidate?

I don't see Marchand taking less than 3 year term but let's see how he plays in Florida before we commit to a 36 year old lol.
In saying that, we did bring Luongo and Jagr in, so you never know.

Jones is definitely some leverage for Zito in the Ekblad conversation as well, plus Ekblad may have soured some trust with Zito related to the PED suspension.
Ya getting Jones definitely makes Ekblad less of a need. Will just have to see what Ek values. If players want the bag they're gonna go somewhere to get it but Zito is in a position where he doesn't have to give in to higher demands.
 
Lmao, nope. You asked how if we can afford him. For the millionth time simpleton, what team retains a big fish for what other teams will pay in FA??

I’ve never said we won’t lose guys, I said we won’t have to lose signed guys
. Like Lindell. Again, you keep changing your question act like a dick when I say we can keep him for under market value. Figure yourself out, outline the question, then come back to me.
oh ya that makes it very clear :lol:

Why not? If you think Ekblad Bennett or Marchand are a more important piece to your team and get a good value back on a trade why wouldnt you move them out?

If the difference comes down to signing Marchand/Ekblad/Bennett or not and you have to trade Rodrigues you wouldnt do that?
 
oh ya that makes it very clear :lol:

Why not? If you think Ekblad Bennett or Marchand are a more important piece to your team and get a good value back on a trade why wouldnt you move them out?

If the difference comes down to signing Marchand/Ekblad/Bennett or not and you have to trade Rodrigues you wouldnt do that?
Depends how Ek, Marchand, and Erod all do in the playoffs. I’m not opposed to moving Erod, but I’ve already said I don’t expect us to retain Marchand and I’m on the fence with Ek. If we can and it costs Rodrigues, fine.

What’s not clear? You still can’t answer or accept my answer…what team team pays the same to retain a big name guy as he’d get in free agency?
 
Depends how Ek, Marchand, and Erod all do in the playoffs. I’m not opposed to moving Erod, but I’ve already said I don’t expect us to retain Marchand and I’m on the fence with Ek. If we can and it costs Rodrigues, fine.

What’s not clear? You still can’t answer or accept my answer…what team team pays the same to retain a big name guy as he’d get in free agency?

Shesterkin, Draisaitl, Buchnevich, Theodore, Swayman, Konecny, Ullmark

All of these guys stayed where they were and got market value in a UFA year.
 
Last edited:
Lmao,
Shesterkin, Draisaitl, Buchnevich, Theodore, Swayman, Konecny, Ullmark

All of these guys stayed where they were and got market value in a UFA year.
Lmao, fair, but you can still argue they’d get more on the market, they’re also much bigger names than Bennett.

What’re you arguing about, though? I have you a list of names of guys who’ve stayed for less and who’ve walked for more. wtf are you needing in this conversation. This is boring and you can’t comprehend previous actions by Zito for some reason. Seriously, wtf are you looking for?
 
Lmao,

Lmao, fair, but you can still argue they’d get more on the market, they’re also much bigger names than Bennett.

What’re you arguing about, though? I have you a list of names of guys who’ve stayed for less and who’ve walked for more. wtf are you needing in this conversation. This is boring and you can’t comprehend previous actions by Zito for some reason. Seriously, wtf are you looking for?
just like running you in circles when you talk nonsense.
 
Im not sure we know that. Its not like Utah will be a destination for a while at least. They may need to go in and overpay UFAs.

Maybe they should to start trying to compete more but they still have about 2-3 years until they are knocking on the wildcard where utah is doorstep that puts Bennett at 31.

Kadris contract was thought to be an albatross hes still going pretty well at 34.

Kadri/Bennett are not remotely comparable - Bennett has yet to cross 50 points in any season in his career, while Kadri has done it in 4 consecutive seasons + 7 times in his career and has flirted with producing at a PPG pace multiple times in his career.
 
You’re running yourself, you just think you’re smarter than everyone else. Iow, you’re just full of shit and couldn’t accept the answer pages ago. ya ain’t getting Lundell, you’ve spent pages crying about it.
what answer?

You dont think the Lundell thing was real right? Your not that oblivious.
 
Kadri/Bennett are not remotely comparable - Bennett has yet to cross 50 points in any season in his career, while Kadri has done it in 4 consecutive seasons + 7 times in his career and has flirted with producing at a PPG pace multiple times in his career.

In 22' Kadri was 5.77% of the cap at 82.5 million

That would put Bennett at 6.68 million. With extra cap hikes announced the next two years hes going to make more then that.

In the 4 seasons prior to each players UFA season Bennett has .72 ppg and Kadri .79 ppg. They are both #2 centers with grit. Kadri better health at 31 Bennett younger at 28.

Completely totally comparable.
 
adding hide avatars option

Ad

Ad