I cite one example to prove the point that nothing has change,..Bedard.
The problem is simple. You all want to see talented offensive hockey played. We love the slick moves and passes, and so do I. BUT!!! The fans want contact.
Playing that style of game exclusively in Juniors and the NCAA leads to bad habits, looking down, assuming that you won't get hit, not being totally aware of where you are going.
Every year young players fortunate to enter the NHL suffer injuries because they have been groomed to a style of play non condusive to the realities of physical play.
A concussion knows no physical boudaries having had one in a simple fall into the boards in a rec league. Many will say that is why I rant...
Again I can't connect dots. "You all want to see"....lol I like physical hockey. So you're assumption is wrong. But whatever fits your narrative.
One example doesn't prove a point. We could go back n forth with single examples. Game has changed.
Again people that played 20/30 years ago also got caught on the tracks in the past. Fighting did clothing to stop it. Nor did physical play at lower levels. Revionist, false thinking.
Players have always got injured and not exclusively because of your reasoning.
Yes kids could learn to take a hit better in lower leagues but Bedard is a bad example cause the opponents st lower levels couldn't skate, anticipate........the game at his level. Kids tried and hurt their team looking to run him. It happens , always have. Game also had "rats, shift disturbed, pests"....even with the old school rules kids don't assume they can't get hit, and that's coming from being on benches with kids.
If ya think not, no worries here. Agree to disagree.
Just can't connect your dots based on watching the game as you have for years