dotcommunism
Moderator
- Aug 16, 2007
- 5,195
- 3,396
Bob you ruined my night.
Uhm, the guy signed Eriksson to a long term/bunch of money deal just last offseason.Jim Benning seems to be getting smarter the longer he's in his job in Vancouver. It's absolutely ludicrous to think he'd give up Tanev for Kane+ considering Kane quite conceivably will be available to him for free in just a year's time.
Uhhh... The "cataclysmic disaster down the stretch" was coming off the bye week in the playoff hunt and winning 2 of 10 games in which we blew big leads late in games or simply played uninspired hockey. Am I missing something here??
Uhhh... The "cataclysmic disaster down the stretch" was coming off the bye week in the playoff hunt and winning 2 of 10 games in which we blew big leads late in games or simply played uninspired hockey. Am I missing something here??
Care to elaborate more on the 2nd half of your statement?
Murray said there was some specific language remembered by both men regarding a favor being owed, implying that they both agreed he owed Murray a favor. It was during a discussion re: expansion draft
Despite the team's issues, Murray does seem to have a plan in place with the expansion draft, "Everything is in play, including trades with teams that may have an issue with the expansion draft coming [with defense]..." Murray stated. "It has affected business a little bit, but for us, I think we're in good shape. I won't say we've made our final decision on the seven forwards protected or anything like that, but we are in good shape and we have players that do fit the criteria for Las Vegas to pick."
I'm in no way a Bylsma supporter, but look at the defence he's had this year and a number of injuries to key players this team has had.
I'm in no way a Bylsma supporter, but look at the defence he's had this year and a number of injuries to key players this team has had.
The Leafs defense is no better for the worse than ours and are in the playoffs. How about Eichel putting up near PPG numbers. How about having the number 1 PP?
The biggest blight on this team, and the reason they are not in the playoffs, are not the injuries. Are not the suspect defense. Are not the player personnel. It is totally a system and player usage problem. Coaching. Bylsma has to go with this play down the stretch. We have too good of talent on offense for us to not be a playoff team and one of the leagues worst teams at even strength scoring.
NYR, Toronto, Boston. Look at those defenses. They're no better than ours, and yet those teams are in/legitimately competing for playoff spots. If injuries were the problem, you'd think the team would be better when healthy than not, but that hasn't been the case at all. The failure of this season is on Bylsma.
This is all true. Biggest problem for this team is coaching. BUT, at the same time, Bylsma had to deal with a revolving door of injuries, injuries which he can't control. Most of this impacted the defense which is our weakest position depth-wise, and further magnified the flaws of Bylsma a lot. He has had to deal with injured guys on defense for close to 90% of the season, even the best coach will have trouble with the defense injuries he had to deal with.
The lack of a good defense or injuries to the defense is no excuse to the inefficiencies of our talented offensive group to not being able to score at 5v5.
I'd also argue that this idiotic stretch pass breakout without any support from the forwards is an even dumber system to employ when you have AHL fodder to run it through on the backend.
So, no, the injuries on defense are not an excuse for Bylsma. His decision to stick to his idiotic system which plays to the weaknesses of our players rather than their strengths is.
I want a coach who runs a puck support system. We have players with ability to handle and control the puck in tight situations. We've added speed to the lineup, let's use short quick passes to our best puck carriers and support them down the ice to maintain possession and spark creativity.
Calgary acquired defenseman Dougie Hamilton from the Boston Bruins in a trade for their first-round pick (No. 15) in the 2015 NHL Draft and the two second-round picks (Nos. 45 and 52) they previously acquired from the Washington Capitals.
And we got Fasching and Lehner to show for the 21st and 2 2nds
Murray is a disgrace.
Are you implying Murray should have gotten Hamilton?.
Toronto and their 16 man games lost from their top-9 forwards and top-3 defensemen is definitely a useful comparison.
I am implying that we threw away our picks. Also can you give me a list of tradable players that Murray can not obtain but other GMs will so I won't dumb.
Do you mind not insulting me. I dont call you stupid when you post dumb stuff. I find your comment quite ignorant or are you in love with Murray that I hurt your feelings?
I am implying that we threw away our picks. Also can you give me a list of tradable players that Murray can not obtain but other GMs will so I won't dumb.
I am implying that we threw away our picks. Also can you give me a list of tradable players that Murray can not obtain but other GMs will so I won't dumb.
Do you mind not insulting me. I dont call you stupid when you post dumb stuff. I find your comment quite ignorant or are you in love with Murray that I hurt your feelings?
Calgary acquired defenseman Dougie Hamilton from the Boston Bruins in a trade for their first-round pick (No. 15) in the 2015 NHL Draft and the two second-round picks (Nos. 45 and 52) they previously acquired from the Washington Capitals.
And we got Fasching and Lehner to show for the 21st and 2 2nds
Murray is a disgrace.
Toronto and their 16 man games lost from their top-9 forwards and top-3 defensemen is definitely a useful comparison.