I think the assumption is Byram with good coaching and not behind Makar/Dahlin would be a 60 point #1 d-man.
If that was the case he’d be traded by now.
I think the assumption is Byram with good coaching and not behind Makar/Dahlin would be a 60 point #1 d-man.
Because a ton of teams have the cap space, the assets the Sabres want, the willingness to part with those assets and the ability to get Byram to sign long-term?If that was the case he’d be traded by now.
And they are probably rightByram's value is actually being propped up because Buffalo is incompetent with their players.
Teams see Reinhart, Eichel, Risto, etc all leave and be better elsewhere.
I think the assumption is Byram with good coaching and not behind Makar/Dahlin would be a 60 point #1 d-man.
uhh Risto? lolAnd they are probably right
Any sane Sabre fan aka 90% would take that and run away laughing, probably at how shallow your response here is.
The Flames could offer Mackenzie Weegar for Byram and some Sabre fans would complain that it's not enough and they want more because Weegar is too old, makes too many mistakes, and gets paid too much for too long.![]()
What would a Detroit return look like?
Would something around Johansson/Danielson/1st be interesting? Not sure what would intrigue you. Kasper is someone I know they said no to for Cozens, so I doubt he'd be available for Byram. I'd be willing to deal any of our prospects TBH. If ASP, then I'd remove the 1st.I don't see anything that intrigues me that is realistic.
Would something around Johansson/Danielson/1st be interesting? Not sure what would intrigue you. Kasper is someone I know they said no to for Cozens, so I doubt he'd be available for Byram. I'd be willing to deal any of our prospects TBH. If ASP, then I'd remove the 1st.
This is why Detroit doesn't work. Sabres don't want futures.Would something around Johansson/Danielson/1st be interesting? Not sure what would intrigue you. Kasper is someone I know they said no to for Cozens, so I doubt he'd be available for Byram. I'd be willing to deal any of our prospects TBH. If ASP, then I'd remove the 1st.
Well, maybe that's not the worst idea, he even looked decent there. Although they played Kulich in the top 6 and it will probably be Norris if he stays healthy. Kasper would be a target for sure.Do we move McLeod to 2nd line center? I don't think that is a good idea.
No one comes to mind except Kasper, it's hard to find a deal.Would something around Johansson/Danielson/1st be interesting? Not sure what would intrigue you. Kasper is someone I know they said no to for Cozens, so I doubt he'd be available for Byram. I'd be willing to deal any of our prospects TBH. If ASP, then I'd remove the 1st.
Well, maybe that's not the worst idea, he even looked decent there. Although they played Kulich in the top 6 and it will probably be Norris if he stays healthy. Kasper would be a target for sure.
No one comes to mind except Kasper, it's hard to find a deal.
Well, right now we have Kulich and Norris as our top 6 C, for me at least the more options the better, maybe one of them will break out if Adams can't get a legit top 6 C. Tage will probably play wing, Norris will obviously be the top 6 C. The competition between McLeod, Kulich and Kasper for the second position doesn't look so bad to me.Well I don't like McLeod, Kulich or Kasper as a 2nd line Center and I despise Norris as a 1st line Center.
But here we are.

Would something around Johansson/Danielson/1st be interesting? Not sure what would intrigue you. Kasper is someone I know they said no to for Cozens, so I doubt he'd be available for Byram. I'd be willing to deal any of our prospects TBH. If ASP, then I'd remove the 1st.
For sure I never meant to imply cozens is the better player. Just that I don't tihnk Detroit is interested in trading Kasper for anything other than a true superstar player which would never happen anyways. The FO is very high on his player profile type and I think they're hoping for a prime Kesler type of player out of him which doesn't seem out of reach given how he finished last season.Opinions are never going to be unanimous on any player.
And I agree your resume is more than one season.
But if any pro scout who watched every game each of them played in Buffalo last year said Cozens was the better player, that guy is in the wrong business.
Because a ton of teams have the cap space, the assets the Sabres want, the willingness to part with those assets and the ability to get Byram to sign long-term?
Trades are almost always more about fit and timing than anything else.
Very interested in seeing if the Sabres elect to take him to arbitration today.
If Byram is truly a #1 d-man you bet your ass a team would offer up something worthwhile.
Buffalo is not trading him for picks snd prospects now.Would something around Johansson/Danielson/1st be interesting? Not sure what would intrigue you. Kasper is someone I know they said no to for Cozens, so I doubt he'd be available for Byram. I'd be willing to deal any of our prospects TBH. If ASP, then I'd remove the 1st.
Stop. You know that is never going to happen what’s the point of even going down this roadBuffalo is not trading him for picks snd prospects now.
If they were, the trade would have occured a week or more ago.
They want sf least one nhl player in return
Their primary ask would br Kasper
I'm just stating facts. And others mentioned this.Stop. You know that is never going to happen what’s the point of even going down this road
If someone were offering that, he likely would’ve already been dealt. A futures package may be their best option, unless they are prepared to pay him the big $$$ themselves.Buffalo is not trading him for picks snd prospects now.
If they were, the trade would have occured a week or more ago.
They want sf least one nhl player in return
Their primary ask would br Kasper
danielson ,26 unprotected 1st and gustaffssonBuffalo is not trading him for picks snd prospects now.
If they were, the trade would have occured a week or more ago.
They want sf least one nhl player in return
Their primary ask would br Kasper