Another poster offered Slakovsky, Evans, and Mailloux. Thoughts?
...said poster should be banned from the Habs Board for a month...
![Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl: 🤣](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@14.0.2/assets/72x72/1f923.png)
Another poster offered Slakovsky, Evans, and Mailloux. Thoughts?
Seems like a good problem to have.So you still need a defensively responsible 1RD for Z and then you also need a defensively responsible 2LD for Dobson. This creates more problems than it solves. Columbus can 100% sit this one out.
Would prefer to send Pulock for less than Dobson personally - I'd prefer to move him for futures
Sounds like it's not worth the opportunity cost of the other things you could acquire with what you'd spend to get Dobson.Seems like a good problem to have.
Another poster offered Slakovsky, Evans, and Mailloux. Thoughts?
Not much. Roy?I actually think I'd prefer a Pulock deal for Montreal over Dobson, not down for the price it would ultimately take. Assuming the return for Pulock starts with Calgary's 1st what else would it take?
His and Pulock's contracts match up quite nicely... If he enters the player assistance program again he gets suspended for a year though right? Feels like a big risk.What would Nichushkin fetch from NYI?
I'd consider him as part of a deal for sure but I don't think he's going to shoot 25% for his career. Would need to addKnies for Dobson
I thought so tooFor Dobson alone ? Too much.
Would prefer Newhook but think I'd probably do that as well, assuming Matheson will also be dealt elsewhereNot much. Roy?
Newhook is fine, would take that deal.Would prefer Newhook but think I'd probably do that as well, assuming Matheson will also be dealt elsewhere
Hutson-Pulock
Guhle-Carrier
Xhekaj-Mailloux/Reinbacher
Could live with that next year while adding Demidov to the existing group