Lou is God
Registered User
He wasn't too bad, I remember he had to retire at an early age after getting hitting the eye with the puck.holy crap this makes me feel old. liked him as a player when he was a flyer for a short period of time
He wasn't too bad, I remember he had to retire at an early age after getting hitting the eye with the puck.holy crap this makes me feel old. liked him as a player when he was a flyer for a short period of time
The Bones Brigade were gleaming your cube.Believe it or not when I was a kid in the 80’s we had Mike McGill, Eddie Guerrero and some other dudes that did skate demos come and skate the half pipe me and my friends built in his back yard.
It was a proper ramp too, 9 foot high with a foot of vert, 16 feet wide with a 12 foot flat though the middle, it was insane, full on half pipe.
This was back in the late ‘80s and we had a local skate shop that promoted all the Bones Brigade stuff come skate our ramp. It was insane! Really good dudes, can’t believe they’re closing in on 60 now. If you haven’t seen Tony Hawks documentary you have to watch it.
Started as a good read…thanks.
Forward consistency has been their issue. Defensive coverage down low has been their issue. Let's hope both take a big jump with the new additions.Issue has been and is still forward play. I think that’s not changing until Ruff is gone.
Yea, after I posted it I went back to read it not realizing he charges that much for his articles.The Bones Brigade were gleaming your cube.
Not a euphemism.
Started as a good read…thanks.
Reading your msg I just had a flashback and started twitching thinking of how easy we made things for the opposing teams forwards with those tap in back door goals.I’ll just hope this means the end of overloading the puck carrier, leaving the back door wide open. Just give me some structure so the Dzone doesn’t look like a peewee soccer game.
Yeah it was really bad last year...not just the tap ins, it was how easy it was for the opposing team to move the puck east/west in our zone...it was like the middle of the ice wasn't defended.Reading your msg I just had a flashback and started twitching thinking of how easy we made things for the opposing teams forwards with those tap in back door goals.
I feel like it was actually worse the year before.Yeah it was really bad last year...not just the tap ins, it was how easy it was for the opposing team to move the puck east/west in our zone...it was like the middle of the ice wasn't defended.
Passes frequently zipped left and right through our zone like the other team was on a PP while one forward ran around looking for someone to cover like the last chair in a game of musical chairs and the other two forwards were looking to breakout.
All good. I really did mean it was a good read. They had me at “1–1-3”.Yea, after I posted it I went back to read it not realizing he charges that much for his articles.
Unfortunately the neutral zone setup probably falls on the HC. Hopfully each coach isn't working in silos. Given the explosiveness/aggressiveness of the NHL in transition, the 1 2 2 doesn't work all that well.All good. I really did mean it was a good read. They had me at “1–1-3”.
So then what can McGill do with the D around the HC‘s setup? Change the coverage style?Unfortunately the neutral zone setup probably falls on the HC. Hopfully each coach isn't working in silos. Given the explosiveness/aggressiveness of the NHL in transition, the 1 2 2 doesn't work all that well.
I would think he has control of the base setup without the puck in the defensive zone and base setup once they get the puck along with the PK.So then what can McGill do with the D around the HC‘s setup? Change the coverage style?
I see. Cool. Thanks! Always a fan of your insights.I would think he has control of the base setup without the puck in the defensive zone and base setup once they get the puck along with the PK.
That still falls on the assistant coach.Forward consistency has been their issue. Defensive coverage down low has been their issue. Let's hope both take a big jump with the new additions.
Who do you think sets the systems in place the assistants are to execute?That still falls on the assistant coach.
Not the head coach, you better believe when Brunette and McGills were interviewed they were asked what systems they would employ given the personnel. Ruff will not be micromanaging all the base structures.Who do you think sets the systems in place the assistants are to execute?
Ironically…
This is great stuff, I am probably gonna cave and buy the playbook just to kmprove my knowledge of scouting and give me a base for coaching moving forward.We seemed to have been modifying this *censored* on the big club (or I paid less attention at the end) but I saw it in it’s pure form live when I went to a Utica playoff game and it’s… yeah. Please stop doing this Mr Ruff.
If you think the head coach doesn't set forth the overall systems the team will be using and merely sits back and listens to assistants direct all the tactics then you've never coached.Not the head coach, you better believe when Brunette and McGills were interviewed they were asked what systems they would employ given the personnel. Ruff will not be micromanaging all the base structures.
Ordinarily yes. I’m not sure how much actual power Ruff will have this year. His chief associate coach is a guy who was a Jack Adams finalist last year and has a contract that lasts two years longer than his. He may be the definition of a figurehead coach with the edict of systems to run coming from above.If you think the head coach doesn't set forth the overall systems the team will be using and merely sits back and listens to assistants direct all the tactics then you've never coached.