Toggle sidebar

Prospect Info: Ryan Johnson, D, 2019 #31 overall: Signed, Rochester (AHL), Recalled 12/5/24

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it.
toomuchsauce said:
I watched an entire game against Penn St. and my only impression of Johnson was "He is a defenseman who played a regular shift in this game."
Click to expand...
That is how I felt about Lydman. He was a lynchpin for our d-corps. We just need him to be able to handle himself in the dzone and get the puck to our playmakers via controlled zone exits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GOALOFSSON
Geez. Johnson is only 19. Looking forward to see him on the WJC roster and for a full year at Minnesota. We'll have a better idea when in the spring. He's a great skater and a high IQ defense prospect. Obviously needs to start showing something by way of offense. I can't see writing him off yet


Edit:
I did not watch either game. I did look at the team scoring for the first two games and noted that one defenseman - Staudacher - had 3 points, all assists. None of the other five D have gotten a point

In the first game, Ryan Johnson had 1 shot, 2 blocks and was+1
In the second game, he had 4 shots - two of which were on goal. Also had 4 blocked shots.and was even for the game
 
Last edited:
Literally every criticism of the poor guy goes back to :

"Sabres management, for the 2nd year in a row, using their second pick on a lower-offensive ceiling 'safe' D-man, when there were multiple high-potential offensive talents on the board that could help a team which lacks offensive talent"
 
DolanPlsGoSabres said:
Literally every criticism of the poor guy goes back to :

"Sabres management, for the 2nd year in a row, using their second pick on a lower-offensive ceiling 'safe' D-man, when there were multiple high-potential offensive talents on the board that could help a team which lacks offensive talent"
Click to expand...
If I remember correctly he was considered a slight reach too, not by much but I think we took him earlier than expected regardless of ceiling
 
jc17 said:
If I remember correctly he was considered a slight reach too, not by much but I think we took him earlier than expected regardless of ceiling
Click to expand...

You are correct. I checked a few and certainly not all pre- draft rankings and saw him ranked anywhere from 29 to 48. Here's a draft profile I found that makes me think that it is far too early to call him a bust as seems is the direction in which many are leaning - DRAFT: Ryan Johnson Prospect Profile
 
  • Like
Reactions: jc17
He w
DolanPlsGoSabres said:
Literally every criticism of the poor guy goes back to :

"Sabres management, for the 2nd year in a row, using their second pick on a lower-offensive ceiling 'safe' D-man, when there were multiple high-potential offensive talents on the board that could help a team which lacks offensive talent"
Click to expand...
He will always have that stigma because of Botterill. Botts was married to poor drafting and targeting safe low ceiling players. I remember Kaliyev being there and convincing myself he was for sure the pick, just like this year with Rossi. Hopefully both pan out to be big contributors
 
Dex said:
You are correct. I checked a few and certainly not all pre- draft rankings and saw him ranked anywhere from 29 to 48. Here's a draft profile I found that makes me think that it is far too early to call him a bust as seems is the direction in which many are leaning - DRAFT: Ryan Johnson Prospect Profile
Click to expand...

I mean, he's 19 and in his 2nd post-draft season. It's definitely too soon to call him a bust.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chainshot and TheMistyStranger
Don’t forget most people look just at points. How good of a defenceman he is will be based on how many points he can accumulate, nothing more.:naughty:
 
How is Samuelsson doing? Albeit he is a different type of D he seems to have the same fate as Johnson, drafted early in the 2nd round over much needed and more skillfull forwards.
 
tsujimoto74 said:
I mean, he's 19 and in his 2nd post-draft season. It's definitely too soon to call him a bust.
Click to expand...
I agree that its too soon to call him a bust. But I think people's unhappiness with the pick has been validated so far given that there haven't been a ton of positive things said about him (not many negatives either) from neutral sources.

Meanwhile guys drafted behind him, that Sabres fans wanted like Kaliyev, Brink, Lavioe, Hoglander, Fagemo had strong years, made the WJC, etc.

Every time fans complain about a pick and ignore the other unexciting players selected around that player, I have to roll my eyes. That said, in this case it seems like the players that fans were rallying for have shown more than Johnson. So he's not a bust, but there's nothing to indicate the fans who wanted other players were wrong. Not yet at least
 
  • Like
Reactions: sabremike
Having followed Chad exchanges about Johnson (not just with Lance) I got the following picture of the player out it.

— Good defender who is a good skater with a good first pass but at the moment doesn’t have much to his game offensively. Jury is out if he can change that (offensive game).
 
The most noticeable thing to me was that he was just incredibly low event. He just wasn’t ever involved in the play much, offensively or defensively, despite playing a decent amount of minutes.

Also, definitely not saying he’s a bust. It was a meh series after a long layoff. Just wasn’t impressive, but I expect he’ll be a three or four year guy, so long road ahead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joshjull
jfb392 said:
The most noticeable thing to me was that he was just incredibly low event. He just wasn’t ever involved in the play much, offensively or defensively, despite playing a decent amount of minutes.

Also, definitely not saying he’s a bust. It was a meh series after a long layoff. Just wasn’t impressive, but I expect he’ll be a three or four year guy, so long road ahead.
Click to expand...

Was he actually playing his correct side, or are they still playing him on the right?
 
joshjull said:
— Good defender who is a good skater with a good first pass but at the moment doesn’t have much to his game offensively. Jury is out if he can change that (offensive game).
Click to expand...

And if that's what he winds up being, that's fine. We've got Dahlin to provide offense, and Risto/Montour/Miller/Joker on the right who can provide some offense.

Not every Dman in our top 6 needs to provide offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dex, tsujimoto74 and joshjull
The question is: Does he have bad games? Has anyone ever witnessed a bad game, or a stretch of bad games?
 
Old Navy Goat said:
Have to see how his game translates to the pros but it'd be hard to be upset if he turns into a smooth skating 10yr pro
Click to expand...

He is a LH Mark Pysyk as a likely best case scenario.

The issue is that the Sabres took that type of player over high impact offensive wingers like Kaliyev and Brink.

Kaliyev was coming off of a 51 goal and 102 point OHL season, Brink had just lit up the USHL as a 17yo, and the Sabres passed on both of them.

It was frustrating then and it is still frustrating now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buffaloed and sabremike
Zman5778 said:
And if that's what he winds up being, that's fine. We've got Dahlin to provide offense, and Risto/Montour/Miller/Joker on the right who can provide some offense.

Not every Dman in our top 6 needs to provide offense.
Click to expand...

Yeah, if he can skate and make a clean 1st pass (along with playing solid D), that'll do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zman5778
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom