RW Nick Lardis - Hamilton Bulldogs, OHL (2023, 67th, CHI)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

So that chart show 7 previous players, 2 of which went on to some good success and then 5 guys, some of which no one ever heard from again.

Mind you most of the guys who drifted away were overagers.

Lardis seems like a guy who could make it or he could end up like Nick Robertson so close yet so far away.
 
Just 2 went on to some good success?

Some pretty good players with good/great careers among those 7 including several HOFers

The worst of those 7 (Toni Tanti) was a 2 time NHL allstar
The chart I was referencing was the 7 players who scored 50 in less than 50 chart.


1739648755675.png
 
My mistake thought you were referencing the post above yours as I had looked at that and scrolled down cutting off part of your post
Ya that's what I figured and Tanti scored about 99% of his goals from less than 5 feet out just great eye hand deflections master.

Everyone else on the list I was familiar with (the second list of 12 guys) except for Brian Gualazzi who was responsible for Gretzky switching from #9 to #99 story is here.

Also this website is great for little nuggets of hockey information on players from that time period.



Was wearing No. 9 for Sault Ste. Marie (OMJHL) at time Wayne Gretzky joined the team. Gretzky had always worn No. 9 as a tribute to his idol, Gordie Howe, but Gualazzi, who had waited patiently for Tim Coulis to leave the team before taking the number, refused to give it up to Gretzky. This led Gretzky to eventually switch to the No. 99 for first time in his career. Gualazzi later explained he was partial to the number because he had been born on Nov. 9. ... Played center for most of his first two major-junior seasons.
 
Last edited:
It’ll be interesting to see what he does in the pros. I see more of a bottom-6 player, I think he’ll lack the ability to drive play at the pro level, but his speed will allow him to see success in the bottom-6
 
It’ll be interesting to see what he does in the pros. I see more of a bottom-6 player, I think he’ll lack the ability to drive play at the pro level, but his speed will allow him to see success in the bottom-6
Idk. One thing you just can’t teach players is how to score. It just seems like he has that ability, and that will carry players a long way. We’ll have to wait and see if it translates obviously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: frontsfan67
It’ll be interesting to see what he does in the pros. I see more of a bottom-6 player, I think he’ll lack the ability to drive play at the pro level, but his speed will allow him to see success in the bottom-6

He’s not a bottom 6 guy to me.

I think he’s a top 6 guy (maybe your 6th forward) or he just doesn’t pan out.

I don’t think he plays a bottom 6 type of game.

Sometimes successful rebuilds require some luck, Lardis is a lottery ticket for the Hawks. If he hits as a legit top 6 forward that could be huge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: frontsfan67

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad