Minus the elite defensive prowess and competitiveness, sure.Can Wood be a Mark Stone type?
What you're describing as Leonard's "absolute worst"... a third liner who scores 20 goals consistently, who is good at everything, and especially good at forechecking and playing defense... what you are describing is basically a first liner. And the fact that he could do that while only getting 3rd line minutes is even more impressive.I think Wood has better puck skills and playmaking than Leonard, and if they both hit their ultimate upside, Wood would be a little better. But many of the things I love about Leonard are things that I actively dislike about Wood. I see Leonard as at the absolute worst a good middle-six winger who does everything well, especially forechecking and defensive play, and can pop 20 goals regularly because of his excellent shot. Wood’s worst case scenario is that he never makes the NHL, in my opinion.
A 40 point two-way winger is not a first liner. That’s a decent 2nd liner.What you're describing as Leonard's "absolute worst"... a third liner who scores 20 goals consistently, who is good at everything, and especially good at forechecking and playing defense... what you are describing is basically a first liner. And the fact that he could do that while only getting 3rd line minutes is even more impressive.
People vastly overate prospects consistently. Leonard is one of my favourite prospects in hockey. But like every other prospect, the worst case outcome is that they do not become consistent NHLers. Just like Yakupov, Griffin Reinhart, every single prospect.
On topic, I really like both players. Both very high potential. If Wood can increase his speed a bit - and It seems like he has a decent amount of room for improvement, considering he probably hasn't had the highest level of developmental coaching so far (BCHL), he could become a force. I prefer Leonard, because I love him as a prospect, but Wood could legit become elite if he can get his skating up a bit.
You didn't say 40 points. You only said 20 goals consistently. I'm just going to check real quick because I'm curious where that would rank...A 40 point two-way winger is not a first liner. That’s a decent 2nd liner.
Goal scoring numbers, sure, 20 goals might be in the top-90, but that not the end-all be-all for definitive scoring.You didn't say 40 points. You only said 20 goals consistently. I'm just going to check real quick because I'm curious where that would rank...
update:
There were 127 20 goal scoring forwards this year.
134 last year
86 in 2019-2020
121 in 2018-2019
118 in 2017-2018
95 in 2016-2017
That's around maybe 120 per year. Probably most of them are the same scorers each year, but not all of them. We could probably say 10-20 at least don't hit that 20 goal mark consistently. So it's probably around 100 at most per year that are consistently hitting 20 goals.
Assuming that there are 3 first line forward spots per team, 3x32= 96 first line goal scorers.
By my math, 20 goals consistently should put him at the bottom end of first line goal-scoring numbers. Add in his great defensive ability and good all-round game, and it looks like you have a first liner.
... If you add in that he only scores 40 points, obviously that changes things. But regardless, if that is truly his absolute worst outcome, that is a tremendous floor.
This is where I've moved him up to after the u18. I had him in the 8-10 range before.I think they are quite dissimilar. Carlsson's skating is coming along, I see it turning into a strength. With Wood we just want it to be less awful.
There is a gap between the two for me. But I am debating if maybe Wood is the guy to pick at #4.
Can Wood be a Mark Stone type?
By my count, there are about 9 guys who people are certain will go in that 5-8 range. A handful of people’s “top 10” picks are going to fall, no matter how you have them ranked this year.I think he goes around 5-8. GMs aren’t going to be able to pass on the physical package and the RHS. It’s too rare .
This is where I've moved him up to after the u18. I had him in the 8-10 range before.
I'm on my phone, but it's posted in the draft list threadWhat's your list these days, Whiskey?
Whiskey's listWhat's your list these days, Whiskey?
The average of them is still a pretty good NHLer.Wood reminds me of both Bret Leason and Blake Wheeler.
Nah, you're insane for not recognizing him for having the highest IQ, best passing and soon to be best skating in the draft. This guy is gonna be the Yao Ming of hockey.Has everyone here gone insane?? Lmao.
He's also has one of the best shots in the draft. Though I question if his skating will ever become anything better than above average.Nah, you're insane for not recognizing him for having the highest IQ, best passing and soon to be best skating in the draft. This guy is gonna be the Yao Ming of hockey.
I actually think skating is one of the most easily improved aspects of the game, especially for younger, taller players who still have a lot of maturing to do.The skating holds me back on him. The league isnt getting any slower and skating is one of the hardest things to improve. He can get around ok but his speed is well below average for this years draft class
I think if all goes perfect he tops out as an average skater, he will never be above average. His stride is short and choppy. Skating stride, after hockey IQ, is the hardest aspect to improve in hockey. Theres been 10+ years of muscle memory up to this point that its next to impossible to change. Edgework, agility, explosiveness can be improvedI actually think skating is one of the most easily improved aspects of the game, especially for younger, taller players who still have a lot of maturing to do.
Going from average to elite isn't really that easy, but going from below average to above average is definitely possible.