ConnorMcMullet
#12 Colby Cave
- Jun 10, 2017
- 10,452
- 18,425
Is a slower Andreas Athanasiou with a better shot a good comparison?
Stylistically I think they're pretty similar.
Stylistically I think they're pretty similar.
What I use to describe him to wings fans is speed and skill of Athanasiou and the grit and defense of Bertuzzi.Is a slower Andreas Athanasiou with a better shot a good comparison?
Stylistically I think they're pretty similar.
That's pretty accurate, I think. I don't think he's as fast as AA though, but I do think he's got a much better shot.What I use to describe him to wings fans is speed and skill of Athanasiou and the grit and defense of Bertuzzi.
Is a slower Andreas Athanasiou with a better shot a good comparison?
Stylistically I think they're pretty similar.
Andreas Athanasiou is incredibly skilled, his hands are among the best in the league.A lot more skill. Strange comparison. Aside from generating their offense off the rush, their games aren't similar.
Andreas Athanasiou is incredibly skilled, his hands are among the best in the league.
I think the difference is Podkolzin's work ethic and feistiness, both of which AA lack. Podkolzin's shot is also better.
Stylistically, I'd say they're pretty similar though.
I used AA as a comparison stylistically, not in terms of potential.How skilled can a player be whose in his prime and has a career PPG average of about .5PPG? Is Athanasiou the most unlucky player in the game with having his skill translate to points and he has 60-70 point talent? Not a bad player by any means, but I don't think anyone's drafting Podkolzin and hoping he turns into a .5PPG player. If that was the case, he wouldn't go in the top 25.
That's like comparing Hughes to a player like Drouin. Lazy and horrible comparisonI used AA as a comparison stylistically, not in terms of potential.
I said that they play a similar game but Podkolzin is more physical, better defensively, and has a superior shot. I think he'll end up the better player.
I have him at 7 behind Kakko, Hughes, Dach, Turcotte, Byram, and Zegras.
Why? I said he plays a similar game. For example, Newhook stylistically is similar to McDavid. Did I say he is going to be as good a player?That's like comparing Hughes to a player like Drouin. Lazy and horrible comparison
Gally with elite skillsWhy? I said he plays a similar game. For example, Newhook stylistically is similar to McDavid. Did I say he is going to be as good a player?
Out of curiosity, who do you think a good comparison is for Podkolzin?
That's like comparing Hughes to a player like Drouin. Lazy and horrible comparison
I'm sorry, but I don't really see that (assuming you mean Gallagher). They both work hard, but the similarities kind of end there. Podkolzin's points come off the rush, not the cycle.Gally with elite skills
Gally is quite good off the rush dude. Pod is also elite along the boards like gally.I'm sorry, but I don't really see that (assuming you mean Gallagher). They both work hard, but the similarities kind of end there. Podkolzin's points come off the rush, not the cycle.
I don’t know if they are that similar stylistically. Athanasiou’s best asset is his speed. Podkolzin doesn’t have great speed. He’s a much better stickhandler, passer and shooter than Athanasiou. Both are similar in that their hockey IQ’s aren’t great and they don’t play the most cerebral games. Most of their offense comes off the rush.
Yep, so the playoffs are rolling about, 1 point in 7 games in VHL playoffs... VHL is a weaker league than Liiga BTW.
Still don't get why he's ranked where he is, not in my top 10.
Yep, so the playoffs are rolling about, 1 point in 7 games in VHL playoffs... VHL is a weaker league than Liiga BTW.
Still don't get why he's ranked where he is, not in my top 10.
I think there’s a big risk involved in drafting a player who doesn’t play for the first team and still can’t even get big minutes. That’s not to say Podkolzin isn’t good enough to play a bigger role, but can you trust that SKA will develop him well? His lack of minutes can’t be good for his development.
Better off going where, AHL?
I watch Athanasiou often, as he and Larkin are really the only players on my team worth watching (maybe Bertuzzi as well, but he won't wow you). He has a ton of raw skill, just doesn't think the game well enough. Sometimes he tries to do everything himself and force plays, and he really isn't good in his own end at all.How skilled can a player be whose in his prime and has a career PPG average of about .5PPG? Is Athanasiou the most unlucky player in the game with having his skill translate to points and he has 60-70 point talent? Not a bad player by any means, but I don't think anyone's drafting Podkolzin and hoping he turns into a .5PPG player. If that was the case, he wouldn't go in the top 25.
Somewhere in the KHL other than SKA.