RW Lenni Hämeenaho - Ässät U20, U20 SM-sarja (2023, 58th, NJD)

MasterofGrond

No, I'm not serious.
Sponsor
Feb 13, 2009
17,147
11,623
Rochester, NY
Hameenaho was a guy around 2023 Draft time where I saw the skill but none of the consistency to make me think he was worth taking that early. After a good year in Liiga, I'm quite intrigued to see him once he comes over and plays in the A for Utica. Still think he's more likely to be a trade chip when the Devils are going for it, but we'll see.
I think the main argument against him as a trade chip, is that the Devils don't have any f***ing forward prospects, lol

I bet they'd try very hard to trade from the D pool first, even if it's now weaker than it was, simply because they're (hopefully) pretty set on D for at least several years.
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
33,411
32,921
NJ
I think the main argument against him as a trade chip, is that the Devils don't have any f***ing forward prospects, lol

I bet they'd try very hard to trade from the D pool first, even if it's now weaker than it was, simply because they're (hopefully) pretty set on D for at least several years.

I don't even really know if any of the prospects we have left have all that much value besides like Casey (and don't you f***ing dare). Silayev obviously but he's not moving. Gritsyuk would have some but there's the obvious concern of if he'd come over to you. I think Lenni would have to put together another good year. Like maybe Vilen
 

MasterofGrond

No, I'm not serious.
Sponsor
Feb 13, 2009
17,147
11,623
Rochester, NY
I don't even really know if any of the prospects we have left have all that much value besides like Casey (and don't you f***ing dare). Silayev obviously but he's not moving. Gritsyuk would have some but there's the obvious concern of if he'd come over to you. I think Lenni would have to put together another good year. Like maybe Vilen
Yeah realistically they’ll be trading picks
 

MichaelFarrell

Registered User
Aug 29, 2016
2,524
3,351
Pittsburgh, PA
Hameenaho was a guy around 2023 Draft time where I saw the skill but none of the consistency to make me think he was worth taking that early. After a good year in Liiga, I'm quite intrigued to see him once he comes over and plays in the A for Utica. Still think he's more likely to be a trade chip when the Devils are going for it, but we'll see.
I think he was also projected as more of a bottom-six guy. I think he was worth drafting in the range they got him because I think he actually has a pretty high floor. Personally, I would’ve gone with Heidt, but Leeni is a good player.

I didn’t get a chance to watch him much this year, but in his draft year I saw him as an up-and-down the lineup type winger that has good compete, is strong along the boards and is good in front of the net. I think you are right that he could be a trade chip. I definitely don’t think the Devils should value him so much that they don’t use him in a trade for a player that can help them now.

If the Holtz trade is any indication, the Devils have no problem doing that lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeyville USA

Jason MacIsaac

Registered User
Jan 13, 2004
22,484
6,635
Halifax, NS
I think he was also projected as more of a bottom-six guy. I think he was worth drafting in the range they got him because I think he actually has a pretty high floor. Personally, I would’ve gone with Heidt, but Leeni is a good player.

I didn’t get a chance to watch him much this year, but in his draft year I saw him as an up-and-down the lineup type winger that has good compete, is strong along the boards and is good in front of the net. I think you are right that he could be a trade chip. I definitely don’t think the Devils should value him so much that they don’t use him in a trade for a player that can help them now.

If the Holtz trade is any indication, the Devils have no problem doing that lol
He wasn’t drafted as a bottom six guy, NJ had a 1st round grade on him.
 

emptyNedder

Not seeking rents
Sponsor
Jan 17, 2018
3,890
8,681
One of my pet peeves is the use of top 6/middle 6/bottom 6. Because that would be 18 forwards.
I understand that top 6 means top line potential; middle 6 means a 3rd liner who can play 2nd line when needed; and bottom 6 is a checking type with a little point production.

Still, I would prefer top line/middle six/fourth line.
 

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
8,287
22,240
St Petersburg
One of my pet peeves is the use of top 6/middle 6/bottom 6. Because that would be 18 forwards.
I understand that top 6 means top line potential; middle 6 means a 3rd liner who can play 2nd line when needed; and bottom 6 is a checking type with a little point production.

Still, I would prefer top line/middle six/fourth line.
You can use whatever you want, there are no ideal way.
I use top line/top 6/middle 6/bottom 6/fourth line.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad