I repeat that Kakko is a brilliant prospect. I am also quite able to agree with Jack Hughes' consensus status as the #1 prospect in the 2019 draft without falsely putting down Kakko. I am also quite able to laud both Jack Hughes and Kappo Kakko without putting the fans down who prefer Kakko.
I did not "bring this to the Kappo topic", I was actually quoted by a writer on this thread. I felt the need to respond to this writer, who was very cool about the entire debate -- he steered away from the type of baseless vitriol I am dealing with currently. I respect his opinion and the opinion of all Kakko fans since, as a draft/prospect writer who appreciates great talent, I am also a Kakko fan. What I wish to stress is that Kappo Kakko has all the makings of an elite hockey player, and Jack Hughes has all the makings of an elite hockey player. Both will be stars. Their stardom will be fun to watch when they play head-to-head, much like Connor McDavid and Jack Eichel or Auston Matthews and Patrick Laine. Players drafted 1/2 always share that type of connection to each other in peoples' eyes.
In a sense, you disrespect Kakko with your constant baseless insulting of Hughes. If Hughes is so mediocre, then why have the dozens of scouts which compromise the ISS and McKeen's and Future Considerations all agreed on him as the consensus #1 over Kakko? Why have all the major draft writers (any of whom would garner thousands of hits simply by ranking Kakko #1 and creating a controversy where none had existed) ranked Kakko as #2 behind a small, flawed player with a "notoriously famous muffin of a shot"? Is Kakko so bad that dozens of experts cannot risk putting him ahead of such a flawed risk as Hughes?
In fact, it's the opposite. Both Hughes and Kakko stand atop a very strong top 10 in the 2019 draft. And the word fact is important here. The opposite of a fact would be, for instance, "top speed can be taught". While skating speed can be improved, there has simply never been a case of a player with average to pretty good speed on the day they were drafted evolve into an elite skater. Thus, this would not qualify as a fact.
You stated you "are not sure in which world all the reporters and scouts are living in" for ranking Hughes first overall. Well, as someone who lives in that world, I assure you that both Jack Hughes and Kappo Kakko are elite prospects worthy of our admiration and undeserving of baseless, fabricated insults. As someone who lives in that world, I assure you that a Ranger fan or Kappo Kakko fan who gushes over Kakko's elite talents will get nothing but emphatic agreement from us. And hopefully we can all learn to live in a world where someone with the prevailing, consensus opinion does not need to face vitriol and aggressive conjecture from someone holding a dissenting opinion simply because they disagree with us.