How about Leon Draisaitl? I'd say that Kakko's a lot closer to him than either Kopitar or Barkov in style, and Draisaitl's excelled on the wing with his big, physical yet very skilled style of play, though he can play C as well. And yet another reminder that Kakko's better than these players were at skating at his age.
I'm very aware that Kakko needs to have some improvement in his skating, but unlike you, I don't think that improving one's skating in general is an issue. If Dylan Strome can skate well enough to score at a PPG pace in NHL, so can Kakko. I guess that's where the way we think differs. In general, I feel safe expecting bigger players to have a significant improvement in skating post-draft, so much so that it barely ever is a concern unless the skating is truly terrible(think Laine pre-draft).
Considering Saku Koivu's comments about Kakko's attitude towards training and considering the physical properties of other TPS products / summer training partners such as Mikko Rantanen and Rasmus Ristolainen, that's a good starting point also. Also, slower players can play the wing as well. Matthew Tkachuk for example has been extremely successful in NHL. In fact, there are some similarities between him and Kakko as well.
In short, I guess what I'm saying is that Kakko's very capable of becoming at least a Barkov / Draisaitl-level skater, and when he does, he's going to have absolutely no issues tearing the league up in my eyes.
What is the meaning of the blue helmet he wears? Rookie?
The best scoring rookie of each team wears that blue helmet and it's sponsored by Red Bull. (Also the best scorer of each team wears a golden helmet sponsored by government-owned betting agency Veikkaus.)What is the meaning of the blue helmet he wears? Rookie?
I don't see any problems with Kakko in Rangers other than he isn't as likely going to win Calder as a player like Laine who got drafted 2nd into a team that could have competed for the Stanley Cup already that season or the next. I know Kakko competing for the Calder is very irrevelant in a big picture but for a small Kakko fanboy like me this situtation isn't ideal.
Rangers definately have a great prospect pool but I don't see them having #1 goalie anymore in couple of years when Ludqvist retires and Shattenkirk doesn't strike me as the greatest possible #1 D to have. I guess I'd prefer if the Rangers already had replacements for those players in their system instead of me having to wait and see them draft or trade for those players.
So I guess what I'm trying to say is, I'm sure the Rangers will look great in a few years but it's probably going to be a bumpy road for the next season or two for Kakko and his team.
I admit I don't know a whole lot
Clearly.
Jab aside - very interesting how personally invested so many of you are in this guy's development.
I don't know the excact numbers but Kakko played pretty much his last 10-15 games in Liiga as LW. So I don't see him being any worse on the LW than he is on RW since he was able to keep his crazy points pace and actually even improve upon it in the last games.Can Kakko play LW as good as he plays RW and to a lesser extent C? I've seen him play RW and C and he's impressed me there but I haven't seen him at LW. Would be easier for NYR as we now might have Kakko, Kravtsov, and Buch at RW; all offhand. Buchnevich has played LW before but he's not nearly as good there as he is at RW. Kravtsov has played a bit of C this year but again, he won't be one long term and his style of play is perfect for RW, not so much LW. We really need RHS forwards for the future now with all 3 I mentioned being LHS along with Chytil, Andersson, and Howden
Can Kakko play LW as good as he plays RW and to a lesser extent C? I've seen him play RW and C and he's impressed me there but I haven't seen him at LW. Would be easier for NYR as we now might have Kakko, Kravtsov, and Buch at RW; all offhand. Buchnevich has played LW before but he's not nearly as good there as he is at RW. Kravtsov has played a bit of C this year but again, he won't be one long term and his style of play is perfect for RW, not so much LW. We really need RHS forwards for the future now with all 3 I mentioned being LHS along with Chytil, Andersson, and Howden
i don’t think he developes much on skating anymore. He isn’t raw skater in my eyes like Barkov was for example. Barkov was like 210-220 lbs and had growing spurt at 16-17 so his technique was bad. He was deceptively suprisingly fast despite of his horrible stride. I doubt Kakko is ever going to be a speedster. I think he will be 3.5/5 speed, 4/5 accerelation, 4.5/5 balance and agility type of skater. His technique is already good and he isn’t heavy. He is still quite lanky despite of his incredible natural core strength. He could work on his leg strength but he needs to fill out too so he needs to move bigger mass. I think his skating potential is about similar what we saw with Barkov and that is more than good with that strength and frame. Not elite but tier below.
Kakko's technique is quite good, but it's about his leg strength, which is where it's easiest to make gains for skating, and no Kakko isn't fully developed at all. Barkov was significantly more developed physically at the same age, he was a true man child.i don’t think he developes much on skating anymore. He isn’t raw skater in my eyes like Barkov was for example. Barkov was like 210-220 lbs and had growing spurt at 16-17 so his technique was bad. He was deceptively suprisingly fast despite of his horrible stride. I doubt Kakko is ever going to be a speedster. I think he will be 3.5/5 speed, 4/5 accerelation, 4.5/5 balance and agility type of skater. His technique is already good and he isn’t heavy. He is still quite lanky despite of his incredible natural core strength. He could work on his leg strength but he needs to fill out too so he needs to move bigger mass. I think his skating potential is about similar what we saw with Barkov and that is more than good with that strength and frame. Not elite but tier below.
Another reason why I think Kakko would do better with the Rangers than Devils is that the Rangers are building a heavily-Euorpean roster. We don’t have any other Finnish players, but there won’t be a big language barrier. All those guys speak English and some of them speak multiple other languages.
What I have read in interviews from European players is that they tend to get along better with other European players than North Americans, regardless if that European player is from the same country as them. It makes sense that Canadians and Americans would be a main clique in a team and Europeans would be another major clique.
By my count, we have Zibanejad, Buchnevich, Chytil, Fast, Kravtsov, Andersson, Shestyorkin, Georgiyev, Hajek, Rykov among the young European core. There’s also the older Lundqvist and one or two other older players like Namestnikov and Claesson who are European. If Kakko needs to speak Finnish, Zibanejad and Georgiyev both speak the language. I also would not be surprised if Reunanen was on the NHL roster within 2-3 seasons. I think he’s going to be good and there’s also Kakko’s current club teammate, Pajuniemi, who has a chance to make the NHL. It also might not be a terrible idea to sign a UFA Finnish player towards the bottom of the roster to help ease Kakko’s transition.
(Edited: sorry, I missed the part where you mentioned Zibby speaking Finnish. Does Georgiev really speak Finnish? That's impressive, even with 3 years at TPS.)
Laine.. disappointment
Pulju.. disappointment
Juolevi.. disappointment
Rangers should trade down and avoid the next disaster coming from finland.
Aho, Barkov, Teräväinen etc.Heiskanen ...
Rantanen ...
Kotkaniemi ...
Hey I can play this game too!
It's almost as if trying to make generic statements about players because of their nationality is...stupid?
Laine.. disappointment
Pulju.. disappointment
Juolevi.. disappointment
Rangers should trade down and avoid the next disaster coming from finland.