Toggle sidebar

RW Jesse Puljujärvi - Karpat, FEL (2016 Draft)

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
MMANumminen said:
Yeah..if he scores today he's back in top 3 ....talking about hyperbole fans
Click to expand...

I mean it's quite understandable. His fans are anxious to see him succeed and when he doesn't they get frustrated. Then again if he gives us something to cheer about of course people will react to it.

The one thing I liked about his game last night was that his line was creating chances and had some puck possession in the offensive zone. I was getting a bit worried that if the 1st line won't click soon the coach will break it up.
 
Pulju scores from in front of the net where he was left alone and got a pass from back of the net and finishes with a wrister.
 
Just scored his first goal of the season against Kalpa. Kalpa forgot him in front of the net alone and he buried it.

Almost thought he was a bust. :sarcasm:
 
If Kärpät scores one more and he doesn't get more points, I'd still say he's a bust. I mean, come on, that's only 25% of the points he should get. :sarcasm:
 
4 bust posts in a row. This amount of trolling from Finnish posters (us), wow. :D

Puljujärvi was good again. Nice to see him get a goal.
 
Karma_ said:
A god would have scored a hattrick while looking absolutely fabulous all the while.
But I am sure he could still carve a respectable, Jani Rita type career.
Click to expand...

I Always saw him having more of a Jesse Joensuu-lite type of ceiling if he actually manages to pan out.
 
Interesting to see that he had 8 shots on first game and no points. 1 shot in second game and it was a goal. :)

Why so much difference..? also ice-time dropped from 16min (8 shots game) to 12 mins (goal game) between these games.
 
Henkka said:
Interesting to see that he had 8 shots on first game and no points. 1 shot in second game and it was a goal. :)

Why so much difference..? also ice-time dropped from 16min (8 shots game) to 12 mins (goal game) between these games.
Click to expand...

It's quite simple really. Kärpät had more PP time and less SH time in the first game, which meant more time on ice for both Puljujärvi and Huml. Puljujärvi also probably played a minute or so in the OT in the first game. The rest is normal variation I'd think.

As for his shots, perhaps he used the first game to calibrate his shot and it was ready to go in the second game :sarcasm:
 
Henkka said:
Why so much difference..? also ice-time dropped from 16min (8 shots game) to 12 mins (goal game) between these games.
Click to expand...
Must have been because Marjamäki took a visit at Hfboards after the 1st game and came to realization Puljujärvi was going to be a bust, hence the shortened ice time.

Now that it turned out not to be so, I'm expecting 36 minutes ice time on his next game.
 
Im the Vatman said:
Must have been because Marjamäki took a visit at Hfboards after the 1st game and came to realization Puljujärvi was going to be a bust, hence the shortened ice time.

Now that it turned out not to be so, I'm expecting 36 minutes ice time on his next game.
Click to expand...

More professionals should do that. If they would browse hfboards more we wouldnt need to put up with bad draft picks or bad trades or free agent signins. We got that ***** locked
 
teravaineSAROS said:
More professionals should do that. If they would browse hfboards more we wouldnt need to put up with bad draft picks or bad trades or free agent signins. We got that ***** locked
Click to expand...

It's amazing how they still don't realize that every prospect is a bust. :sarcasm:
 

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom