Shocker
Registered User
- Dec 20, 2019
- 2,141
- 3,915
Zegras staring down the Russian bench after his goal and then losing anyways made me chuckle.
Yes....Many times in that game Russia had no answer for the Canada forecheck ...Askarov bailed out Russia as well.....Good game not saying it was dominated by either team but that's what I saw too often they struggled getting the puck out....Like not scoring on two clean breakaways? Russia had more scoring chances in that game.
He impressed me all night, surprised there wasn't more chatter about him.Mukhamadullin was the best dman on the ice last night. You love to see it
He impressed me all night, surprised there wasn't more chatter about him.
Yes but it doesn't take away from the fact that with a different goalie it would have been a completely different game which Russia still would have had a great chance to win. USA got close because Russia took the foot off the gas and took stupid penalties to begin with.
That's the impression I'm starting to get as well, sadly.. Because what we've seen today was definitely out of character and, frankly, weird. All that hand-wawing etc... It's like he's nervous as hell and just wants to act out.
Also to people saying Askarov was good.. What the hell are you talking about....
That wraps it up nicely.Wouldn't it be funny if neither Askarov nor Knight were among the best goalies in the tournament? Thought the USA was a step behind the Russians all night. They lost puck battles, were hesitant and indecisive with the puck, which often led to turnovers. Russians were much better, but don't have the offensive firepower that I am used to seeing from them, or the result would have been much more lopsided.
Oh, and US PP...yikes...running into one another, terrible spacing, mediocre zone entries...and hit the damn net with your shots! The US D were forgettable, also. Not out and out bad, but not an asset.
Oh, and love Beniers!
Thanks. I’ve watched a lot of hockey in my day. This seemed like an easy one to predict after watching the pre tournament games.Nice call!
Highlights can leave out empty net goals a lot of the time.TSN-Highlights without russian empty net 5:3 goal? Why?
Beniers is pretty darn good tooWhy is using Turcotte and Zegras as your 1-2 punch at C such a hard concept for Leaman?
No i ve never seen that! I m sure that would be contrary TSN show us the US-Empty netter.Highlights can leave out empty net goals a lot of the time.
The Russians played better in all 3 zones and the face off circle. They are disciplined, play with structure, and play with an edge. Team USA turned the puck over many times trying to make plays that were not there. Especially at the offensive blueline. Hard to overcome to monster gaffes by your goaltender. On the first one 3 guys were puck watching when they had time to react to the wide open Russian.
Not real impressed with the coaching of team USA.
They literally do it all the time.No i ve never seen that! I m sure when if would be contary TSN show us the US-Empty netter.
Exactly. It's a short tournament, and they need to play the guy who's clicking.Apparently this is the third big tournament Knight has looked average at best in for the USA
Wolf may not be the better prospect long term. But I’m pretty sure he’s the better goalie right now, I’d be pretty shocked if USA went in another direction. Wolf looked in the zone, Knight has looked shaky.
I don't know why 2003 considered so much better than 2001 or 2002? I see the reasons to consider 2004 an exceptional year.I would very much like to see, what Larionov will do with our 2003-04 year kids. Just imagine these team, but with twice as many and twice as much talent.
I don't know why 2003 considered so much better than 2001 or 2002? I see the reasons to consider 2004 an exceptional year.
I am talking about the non-existent russian D in the 3rd because they got complacent after going up 3 goals. It is a mindset thing clearly. Nothing about skill or ability. Happens to the best of them. And then it's hard to get focused again.what are you talking about? Russians generated some great chances in 3rd. Wolf bailed USA team out a number of times.
Knight will get the next start, and look good against a weak opponent because there’s no pressure. Under pressure he appears to struggle.Apparently this is the third big tournament Knight has looked average at best in for the USA
Wolf may not be the better prospect long term. But I’m pretty sure he’s the better goalie right now, I’d be pretty shocked if USA went in another direction. Wolf looked in the zone, Knight has looked shaky.
Even shorter since there was only 1 pre-tournament game. A lot of these players have played very few games this year and some.maybe none. No time to wait for your goalie to try and get his shit together... particularly when you have a backup playing shutout hockey.Exactly. It's a short tournament, and they need to play the guy who's clicking.
It’s insane how Loaded Michigan is this year lol
I don't understand why so many old fart GMs still have a bias against undersized players when it's been proven speed & skill > size in the modern NHL
Askarov will be loved in Nashville very soon I'm thinking