North
Registered User
- Jun 25, 2009
- 15,697
- 13,298
If you can’t understand context for some in division trades I can’t help you.
Your no where near a point. You just want argue for the sake of arguing and then start name calling when people disagree.
I don’t have any more time for people who resort to sealioning.
No we really can’t. We need those guys to come in so we can actually start trading from a position of strength.
So if we don't get Nyquist, are we screwed?
So if we don't get Nyquist, are we screwed?
Who would you put there instead? He's literally our only signed winger with goals in the double digits
So if we don't get Nyquist, are we screwed?
This team needed trades, not free agents. What a disaster the Holland era is turning out to be.
Oilers are going to be comically bad next season.
We will see in a Week ahahWho would you put there instead? He's literally our only signed winger with goals in the double digits
Him and Stralman are the last that I'd be spending money and mid-term on.
Otherwise... keep the capspace available and flexible for next year. Give guys that need rebound opportunities like Brassard a chance to regain some OTT/NYR form. See if you can coax an NHL player/campaign out of Pirri. etc.
I’m not the biggest Russell fan but the team isn’t exactly swimming with NHL defenders right now.
NO.. It's Leafs and the NHL needs a story in the world so it will happenThis Leafs/Sens trade has to be a lie, you can NOT make in-division trades in the NHL. It has been declared by HF Oil and it is true.
NHL easily voids it.
I'd probably put some calls in on Ferlund and see where that number is, but the FA options are scarier than they are quality right now.
This team needed trades, not free agents. What a disaster the Holland era is turning out to be.
Oilers are going to be comically bad next season.
Much better than I expected, a little longer than I'd be comfortable with if i were a canucks fan, but 6m is probably market value for him.
Omg.. WHY didn't we get him for that?? The canucks... the CANUCKS got him for that?? why didn't we at least try for him??
We haven’t even played the first preseason game in the “Holland Era” yet. Pretty early for that prognostication.
It’s not looking great so far but let’s wait and see what the actual opening day roster looks like before declaring Holland to be a disaster.
Just because he didn’t stupidly overpay for overrated FAs doesn’t mean he’s finished.
I always thought this summer was set up better for trades, not free agents.
Tons of the free agents have massive question marks attached.
The question is what assets can they use?
Just attach JP with Lucic and dump them somewhere out East. Get a prospect or hell, even a pick. Just get Lucic out of here
Neither seem to want to be here anyway
The significant trading period has passed by, not going to see much action going forward imo. Historically there's a dozen trades league wide from end of June to pre-season.
Looks like the org put their bets on free agents but like what's happened before, we're at the end of everyone's list of desired destinations. Just used by agents to drive up their clients contracts in bids.
If you can’t understand context for some in division trades I can’t help you.
You’re no where near a point. You just want argue for the sake of arguing and then start name calling when people disagree.
I don’t have any more time for people who resort to sealioning.