Oilhawks
Over Old Hills
- Nov 24, 2011
- 28,771
- 52,178
Neal for Murray?
Matt Murray is owed a pretty big chunk of money in real cash, and Ottawa has a bunch of young goalies with upside.
Isn't Neal owed $6M in real dollars though?
Neal for Murray?
Matt Murray is owed a pretty big chunk of money in real cash, and Ottawa has a bunch of young goalies with upside.
I think we are all Oilers fans here (well, except for the trolls ). We can disagree on things, that's fine.Ding ding ding
You are arguing with Soundwave though who wanted to spend 4mill on Bogosian cause it would get him here and throw him on the top pairing.
Guy is a massive Leafs fan and won't admit it and overrated every player to touch that team
Mike had a so-so year his first year here, realized it and went and got appropriate training to elevate his game. Who's to say that Anderson will do the same? The guy is flawed. Bringing him in over Koskinen is likely a side-grade, maybe 10% upgrade at most. Not worth it
Because one injury riddled season told you that? He was literally .917 as the defacto starter for the Leafs one year prior.
Under Keefe they played at like a 105+ point pace.
What's wrong with that.
Andersen-Smith would be probably the best tandem in the division and the best tandem the Oilers have had in like 30 years.
Both guys can play and function as a legit starter for fairly long stretches, and when they can't having two of them means they can give the other guy a break to reset.
And if Andersson can't even get Toronto out of a round why so you think he will do shit here?Smith had one bad (terrible) month in December 2019, that's all. The Oilers record is ridiculously sky high otherwise for basically his entire tenure.
Now in the playoffs, he shows decline then.
But there is no magical goalie that I can see that guarantees the Oilers better performance for sure in the playoffs. If Grubauer can't get the Avalanche past round 2, why is it a lock he'll do it with Edmonton's lesser overall roster?
There is something to be said for going lower on term, Andersen is more likely to go on a lower term contract, which buys you time to find someone who can actually get the Oilers to a real place of contention.
Tierney for 3C?
Also Dadanov can be very productive with elite linemates. 66-point average over 3 years with Barkov. $3.5M could be a steal.
That is my #1 guy. If he can play well in Buffalo, he *should* be able to elsewhere
Is that due to PJ improving that much or not wanting Bura?
Neal for Murray?
Matt Murray is owed a pretty big chunk of money in real cash, and Ottawa has a bunch of young goalies with upside.
And if Andersson can't even get Toronto out of a round why so you think he will do shit here?
I just rather a goalie who isn't a known choker that's on a visible declineBecause the Oilers probably have a couple more round 1 ass kickings coming their way anyway.
You need to have better management that moves quicker than what we're seeing to demand better than that.
But this team can very easily still fall backwards and go back to missing the playoffs, which would be really bad. Playoffs and taking your licks in round 1/2 with actual fans this time is a lot better than that.
It's just that people think we automatically should go straight to being a round 3/Finals contender type team, well you kind need top level management if that's your expectation. Thinking having just some cap room would automatically fix everything was naive.
I expect playoffs next year, I don't expect like round 3 or something.
Smith signed a one year deal worth pennies on the cap. Would Andersen do the same? I doubt it.I would still take him, Koskinen simply cannot handle the mental duress of being a starter for even 2 weeks.
Grubauer likely stays in Colorado.
Ullmark is a coin flip at best.
Past that there is no clear cut great option that will be cheaper with less term than Andersen.
Mike Smith had a shit season in Calgary before coming here too and refound his game.
The Oilers are probably not going to be an actual Cup contender next year, Holland is not clever enough to do all that needs to be done this quickly it's becoming clear that was always an unrealistic ask.
I just rather a goalie who isn't a known choker that's on a visible decline
Smith had one bad (terrible) month in December 2019, that's all. The Oilers record is ridiculously sky high otherwise for basically his entire tenure.
Now in the playoffs, he shows decline then.
But there is no magical goalie that I can see that guarantees the Oilers better performance for sure in the playoffs. If Grubauer can't get the Avalanche past round 2, why is it a lock he'll do it with Edmonton's lesser overall roster?
There is something to be said for going lower on term, Andersen is more likely to go on a lower term contract, which buys you time to find someone who can actually get the Oilers to a real place of contention.
Smith had a much better save % this past season, and he looked a lot better in net overall. Playoffs are a crap shoot, a goalie can be great until he isn't. Some had mediocre seasons then were better in the playoffs. Hell, don't have to go past Smith who sucked with the Flames in the regular season but was far from the reason they lost to the Avs that one year.
I like Grubauer but I don't think he's worth the $6Mx6 that he wants (like Markstrom wasn't). I would like to see Ullmark, Bernier or Mrazerk since they should be cheaper and have played well for weaker teams (obviously Mrazek has played in front of better D than the other two lately).
I just don't think that Anderson is big enough of an upgrade (if at all) to saddle the team with a buyout of Koskinen
Neal for Murray?
Matt Murray is owed a pretty big chunk of money in real cash, and Ottawa has a bunch of young goalies with upside.
But you'd pay that to a guy who has been steadily getting worse on a good team?I'd offer Ullmark like 4 x 3 years, maaaaaybe 4 ... but if he seriously is asking for moer than that, no thanks.
The track record there is extremely limited and it's kinda easier to play on a bad team in *some* ways because there's no expectation to do shit, it's a different story when people suddenly expect you to deliver.
But you'd pay that to a guy who has been steadily getting worse on a good team?
My word.
But you'd pay that to a guy who has been steadily getting worse on a good team?
My word.
Matt Murray's contract is horrible.
Matt Murray's contract is horrible.
If they were willing to do it for James Neal, I might bite, but you really have to hope he finds his game again before that 3rd season.
Smith had a much better save % this past season, and he looked a lot better in net overall. Playoffs are a crap shoot, a goalie can be great until he isn't. Some had mediocre seasons then were better in the playoffs. Hell, don't have to go past Smith who sucked with the Flames in the regular season but was far from the reason they lost to the Avs that one year.
I like Grubauer but I don't think he's worth the $6Mx6 that he wants (like Markstrom wasn't). I would like to see Ullmark, Bernier or Mrazerk since they should be cheaper and have played well for weaker teams (obviously Mrazek has played in front of better D than the other two lately).
I just don't think that Anderson is big enough of an upgrade (if at all) to saddle the team with a buyout of Koskinen
And so is Neal's. If Murray completely shits the bed we could buy him out next offseason and the buyout would look like this:
'22-23 $4.5 million in savings
'23-24 $5.5 million in savings
'24-25 -$2.5 million
'25-26 -$2.5 million