Rumor: - Rumours and Proposals Thread | Post Mortem Edition | Page 334 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Rumor: Rumours and Proposals Thread | Post Mortem Edition

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s weird and crossed a privacy line for sure, but should it keep someone from doing their job 5 years later is the question.
For sure? Do we really know “for sure”?

Gaudreau and Jenner have statements on file stating he wanted to share photos with them, one on one of families and their lives to know each other better. they have stated that MB did the same, they all stated they agreed and didn’t feel anything untoward.

We have anon statements that younger players subjected to same felt intimidated. Nothing attributed to any player specifically.

We have an NHL club that elected to pay an employee a significant amount of their multi year contract out. Probably to stop a potential firestorm, no different than other orgs have done when there is no wrong doing but they prefer to stop the burn.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lay Z Boy GM
it sounds like Adam Fantilli was the one that was bothered by the phone thing. I’m still not sure what Babcock was actually asking.. like was he asking for people to hand over their phones? Or just asking if they’ve got pics of family or their summer vacations?

That’s a little out of touch if he just asked for some regular pictures but not some unforgivable crime. I’ve handed my phone to people to show them pictures plenty of times, including at work, and I’ve had many people hand me their phone for the same purpose. Personally I don’t go scrolling through their pictures and I hope they don’t do that to me, but I also don’t have anything crazy on my phone.

There’s not enough details for me to determine if this was an innocent misunderstanding or some creepy overstep of boundaries.
 
This was my impression, but everything I've heard today stated they did their investigation, followed up with cbj and the CBJ gave him the "option" to resign

Only the NHLPA did an investigation back then and that was enough for Babcock to quit. Then NHL decided not to follow up since Babcock resigned before they could do it.

So now the NHL will have to complete their investigation based on what the NHLPA found and whatever their own evidence is.
 
it sounds like Adam Fantilli was the one that was bothered by the phone thing. I’m still not sure what Babcock was actually asking.. like was he asking for people to hand over their phones? Or just asking if they’ve got pics of family or their summer vacations?

That’s a little out of touch if he just asked for some regular pictures but not some unforgivable crime. I’ve handed my phone to people to show them pictures plenty of times, including at work, and I’ve had many people hand me their phone for the same purpose. Personally I don’t go scrolling through their pictures and I hope they don’t do that to me, but I also don’t have anything crazy on my phone.

There’s not enough details for me to determine if this was an innocent misunderstanding or some creepy overstep of boundaries.

At the time I listened to Friedman interview Gaudreau on his podcast about it, and Gaudreau basically chalked it up to a lot of nothing. Said he just showed him some pictures and it was an effort to get to know the players better.

My understanding is that it didn't go the same way for every player, but the Gaudreau interview was the only one I heard that was from someone with first hand knowledge.

Said it before, but this feels to me like a good faith effort by Babcock to relate to his players, but is too old/out of touch to realize or grasp that publicly showing the contents of somebody's phone is a huge no no.
 
it sounds like Adam Fantilli was the one that was bothered by the phone thing. I’m still not sure what Babcock was actually asking.. like was he asking for people to hand over their phones? Or just asking if they’ve got pics of family or their summer vacations?

That’s a little out of touch if he just asked for some regular pictures but not some unforgivable crime. I’ve handed my phone to people to show them pictures plenty of times, including at work, and I’ve had many people hand me their phone for the same purpose. Personally I don’t go scrolling through their pictures and I hope they don’t do that to me, but I also don’t have anything crazy on my phone.

There’s not enough details for me to determine if this was an innocent misunderstanding or some creepy overstep of boundaries.
The thing is…older players weren’t bothered by it. It was reported that Jenner and Gaudreau were fine with it. Younger players felt it was invasive due to the power imbalance.

I do think Babcock was trying to bond with the players because apparently he too was sharing photos with them, but it was an odd way to do it.
 
Oilers are about to turn up the heat on the NHL by forcing them to reveal all of Babcock’s indiscretions.

Cassidy would be so much easier for everybody…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sanchez
Only the NHLPA did an investigation back then and that was enough for Babcock to quit. Then NHL decided not to follow up since Babcock resigned before they could do it.

So now the NHL will have to complete their investigation based on what the NHLPA found and whatever their own evidence is.

So if he resigned based on the NHLPA investigation, why does the NHL need to do an investigation? Does it mean that the result of the NHLPA investigation can be overturned by the NHL?

This is all very confusing
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ConnorNova0929
The thing is…older players weren’t bothered by it. It was reported that Jenner and Gaudreau were fine with it. Younger players felt it was invasive due to the power imbalance.

I do think Babcock was trying to bond with the players because apparently he too was sharing photos with them, but it was an odd way to do it.
At the time I listened to Friedman interview Gaudreau on his podcast about it, and Gaudreau basically chalked it up to a lot of nothing. Said he just showed him some pictures and it was an effort to get to know the players better.

My understanding is that it didn't go the same way for every player, but the Gaudreau interview was the only one I heard that was from someone with first hand knowledge.

Said it before, but this feels to me like a good faith effort by Babcock to relate to his players, but is too old/out of touch to realize or grasp that publicly showing the contents of somebody's phone is a huge no no.
Then why resign after the PA investigation?

Why did John Davidson say “we got it wrong” with the Babcock hire? I don’t think it was that simple
 
At the time I listened to Friedman interview Gaudreau on his podcast about it, and Gaudreau basically chalked it up to a lot of nothing. Said he just showed him some pictures and it was an effort to get to know the players better.

My understanding is that it didn't go the same way for every player, but the Gaudreau interview was the only one I heard that was from someone with first hand knowledge.

Said it before, but this feels to me like a good faith effort by Babcock to relate to his players, but is too old/out of touch to realize or grasp that publicly showing the contents of somebody's phone is a huge no no.
So his intention wasn’t bad at all, he was trying to relate to players one by one as a person. His actual intentions matter a lot to me.

I suppose there might have been some other motive, maybe he saw the veterans spent their summers diligently training and spending time with their wives and babies and other guys just had pictures of them partying or something. Maybe he scrolled too far in someone’s phone and saw something embarrassing.

Either way, it’s something that can be learned from if he didn’t have bad intentions. We don’t need to bury people over misunderstandings with no ill will.

I think we’ve all been there at some point in our lives interacting with someone of an older generation, maybe they do something that wouldn’t fly in our generation but we understand their intentions aren’t bad and you deal with it in a mature way. Some day we’ll be a geezer trying to say or do something nice without realizing nobody does that anymore.
 
So if he resigned based on the NHLPA investigation, why does the NHL need to do an investigation? Does it mean that the result of the NHLPA investigation can be overturned by the NHL?

This is all very confusing

I think the NHLPA has to recommend it to the NHL because it's technically not a PA issue since it's a coach but it affects the players. NHL is the only authority that would be able to suspend a coach, PA can't do it.

So NHLPA did their due diligence first and said "Ya there's something here, NHL you investigate and punish (if needed). "
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad