Wouldn’t 2 x 5M wingers make more sense than 1 x 10M winger?
for a full 8 years, I could see it.But he’s signing here for 8M
for a full 8 years, I could see it.
But what about the long term outlook?
It's not just Nurse we have to worry about. Bear after a bridge deal? Bouchard? Nuge and Larsson? Heck, after 3 seasons of a Hall contract, we'd have to re-sign Klefbom.
It seems like the 'right' move is to use cap savings such as expiring buyout hits to keep what we have. Use young players to fill holes, or bargain hits.
I'm on board with renting Hall though. If he really catches fire, then give him money and find a way to make it work.
We are just now seeing some light at the end of the tunnel in terms of escaping our dead cap and bad spending. I'd think we'd start being careful
Russell, Benning, and Chiasson would have to be moved out. All doable. I’ve liked what I’ve seen from Nygard and Haas, and Benson will no longer be waiver exempt next year, so that’s half your bottom 6 on cheap deals. Add in that with a loaded top 6, the bottom 6 would get max 18 min combined between the two lines. Bear has made the team. Bouchard is going to be on the team next year. Along with Larsson that’s your right side. Nurse and Klefbom are on the team, so you’d need a bottom pairing left dman and a #7. If not Jones and Lagesson, other cheap options. You spend where you need to spend, and you fill out the complimentary pieces with cheap deals. That’s where the league is going.If the cap goes up 2 mill...
Draisaitl - McDavid - Blank
Blank - RNH - Neal
Blank - Blank - Blank
Khaira - Blank - Chiasson
Blank, Blank
Blank - Blank
Klefbom - Larsson
Russell - Blank
Blank
Koskinen
Blank
With 25 mill in capspace. Say Hall signs for 10 mill that leaves 15 mill for 12 players. Nurse will cost say at least 6.5, Bear say...3...that leaves us 5.5 mill for 9 players which is actually impossible salary cap wise. So we then have to move out cap. Unless we are planning on filling our entire 3rd line with sub 1 mill players which we don't even do now...
Wouldn’t 2 x 5M wingers make more sense than 1 x 10M winger?
Agreed. Both should be moveable as well. Russell will only have 1.5 mill salary after his 1 mill signing bonus is paid and will have half the league as options to be traded to.Getting rid of Russell and Chiasson's $6M for next season should be Holland's main goal from here on out, IMO. You can't have that much money spent on dead weight when you're already paying $4.5M in buyouts and retention.
There's basically no chance of getting Hall with those two still on the roster.
That's intriguing. I'd still worry that what he's really doing is cultivating interest so he can get more cash.FTR, I’ve heard similar with Hall, to the point that his dad flew out last year to meet with Oiler management to discuss possible fit. That was with the Chiarelli regime, however, so things could have changed significantly.
I'm looking at Mikael Granlund as a potential 2nd line winger that might come in at a lower cost due to his lack of production in Nashville.
When he was playing his best hockey in Minnesota, he was a 60-70 point guy who played all situations and was capable on the faceoff dot. Was 13th in Selke voting one year.
He and RNH together would be something.
I'd be scared to throw money at him.
Something seems way off with him. He's 15th in scoring on the Preds right now.
Yep, move out those 3 guys and it's perfectly doable. Add in that a Pulju return could probably get us a decent young 3rd liner on an ELC and we would be fine.Russell, Benning, and Chiasson would have to be moved out. All doable. I’ve liked what I’ve seen from Nygard and Haas, and Benson will no longer be waiver exempt next year, so that’s half your bottom 6 on cheap deals. Add in that with a loaded top 6, the bottom 6 would get max 18 min combined between the two lines. Bear has made the team. Bouchard is going to be on the team next year. Along with Larsson that’s your right side. Nurse and Klefbom are on the team, so you’d need a bottom pairing left dman and a #7. If not Jones and Lagesson, other cheap options. You spend where you need to spend, and you fill out the complimentary pieces with cheap deals. That’s where the league is going.
Yep, move out those 3 guys and it's perfectly doable. Add in that a Pulju return could probably get us a decent young 3rd liner on an ELC and we would be fine.
I'm looking at Mikael Granlund as a potential 2nd line winger that might come in at a lower cost due to his lack of production in Nashville.
When he was playing his best hockey in Minnesota, he was a 60-70 point guy who played all situations and was capable on the faceoff dot. Was 13th in Selke voting one year.
He and RNH together would be something.
That’s actually a good idea. Persson expires as an RFA?Along with that, I was thinking it'd be a good idea to get Persson on the PP, pump up his value and be ready to trade him in the offseason. I really like the player, but I think he's obviously just keeping that spot warm for Bouchard. Basically make the reverse of the Kahun for Maatta trade.
Adding Hall and a couple of decent, young 2nd/3rd liners while keeping basically the same D core(Persson/Russell out, Bouchard/Jones in) would be pretty awesome.
Bad fit. Granlund has a healthy resume of solid production and he's had no significant injury history. He's coming off of a 3 year $5.75m contract. Maybe he's willing to go down the same road on his next deal. Short term to keep the cap number up.I'd be scared to throw money at him.
Something seems way off with him. He's 15th in scoring on the Preds right now.
I honestly don't know what this means.Finnish check; Forward check
No thanks