Fantomas
Registered User
- Aug 7, 2012
- 13,808
- 7,662
Want to see IOC's criteria for burden of proof? It is hilarious.
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/ioc_adr_pyeongchang_2018_eng.pdf
In other words, accusations do not have to be proven - the panel just decides one way if it feels like it. None of this would hold up in a court of law. The IOC is controlled by unelected corrupt goons, who answer to no one but powerful interests with an axe to grind.
“…The standard of proof shall be whether the IOC has established an anti-doping rule violation to the comfortable satisfaction of the hearing panel bearing in mind the seriousness of the allegation which is made. This standard of proof in all cases is greater than a mere balance of probabilities but less than proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Where these Rules place the burden of proof upon the Athlete or other Person alleged to have committed an anti-doping rule violation to rebut a presumption or establish specified facts or circumstances, the standard of proof shall be by a balance of probabilities…”
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/ioc_adr_pyeongchang_2018_eng.pdf
In other words, accusations do not have to be proven - the panel just decides one way if it feels like it. None of this would hold up in a court of law. The IOC is controlled by unelected corrupt goons, who answer to no one but powerful interests with an axe to grind.