Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | Y'all Got Any Good Goalies?

CanadasTeam99

Registered User
Jul 22, 2024
2,748
2,980
Another tidbit from Friedman

There’s a belief that Bowen Byram eventually wants to be the number one defenseman on whatever team he’s playing for and that’s something to keep an eye out as he gets closer to UFA status
 
  • Like
Reactions: McTonyBrar

McTonyBrar

Registered User
Apr 2, 2018
19,769
21,591
Buffalo is going to make a terrible move here. That's a team that needs to clean house before any major trades are made - have the track record of Eichel, Reinhart, et. al.
They're trying to trade Cozens as well and Nashville is gunning for him. Is Buffalo ever going to realize their foolish decisions?

They traded Eichel and Reinhart early. Look at what happened to them
 

Shanahanigans

Registered User
Jun 16, 2011
2,555
2,740
I don't think Tage Thompson is a true #1 C, and aside from Dahlin I don't trust their defensemen, including Byram. I think they're going to get rid of the wrong players and continue to toil. Cozens had 31 goals as a 21 year old C 2 years ago, something clearly is there, but the environment stinks. I feel bad for Mcleod, that franchise is a death stamp for so many players especially if you aren't a star.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mcnotloilersfan

bucks_oil

Registered User
Aug 25, 2005
8,805
5,193
I don't think Tage Thompson is a true #1 C, and aside from Dahlin I don't trust their defensemen, including Byram. I think they're going to get rid of the wrong players and continue to toil. Cozens had 31 goals as a 21 year old C 2 years ago, something clearly is there, but the environment stinks. I feel bad for Mcleod, that franchise is a death stamp for so many players especially if you aren't a star.

I'm still a big believer in Owen Power.

Unfortunately we have nothing of value to send their way for him (that they didn't already have and discard).
 

AddyTheWrath

Registered User
Mar 24, 2015
11,452
20,179
Toronto
Like the most hilarious of overreactions. EVERY time a trade is made this fanbase freaks out. Then using a 1 game sample size to be angry about not getting Cam F'n Fowler is PEAK hfboards lol.
It's usually just 1 poster who freaks out whenever the Oilers aren't involved in any trade (regardless of whether it was a good or bad one lol)
 

BarDownBobo

Registered User
Oct 19, 2012
6,594
3,484
City of Champions
I was the biggest McLeod supporter on the board, but he isn't better than Henrique defensively, the fundamentals of Henrique's defensive game and defensive awareness is markedly better, what McLeod did better was drive possession (mainly through leveraging his skating advantage offensively and defensively) which is what is actually being shown in his analytics.

What I have been arguing for this year is we need to target an upgrade to pair with Henrique who helps him with zone entries and helps stimulate offense and zone possession for his line. Henrique still has offensive chops, but he needs a straw that stirs the drink.
If/when the team gets healthy I could very well see Kane-Henrique-Kapanen being put together as the third line and being a very very effective one at that.
 

Dirk Dangler

Registered User
Jun 24, 2016
123
231
IMO McCarron is more of a RW than he is a center, so I don't think he should really be seen as a D. Ryan replacement.

I want to see Philp actually get a string of games before deciding, but Philp does have a style of game that I wouldn't be surprised if he was very steady and stable even as a rookie.

Also Philp is an old rookie at 26 and McCarron while being a known name for a long time at 29 yrs old, he's only been an effective hockey player for roughly 2 seasons worth of games and last season was his first playoff appearance and was a cumulative -7 with 0 points in 9 GP.
I used to think that too because he broke into the league on the wing and I hadn’t paid him much attention till lately. But hes taken 50 more face offs than Ryan this year and 300 more than him last year at well over 50%. Took the third most faceoffs on the Preds last year. He is pretty clearly a center.

A 6’6” 230+ lbs center who plays on their PK, has 50 hits (would only be behind Podz here), and put up 12 goals and 22 points last year. He’s an upgrade over Ryan and Philp and fills the few things we are lacking on the forward group. Namely, he’s huge, tough to play against and can play.
 

94 Oil Drops

Admirer of cinema, history, and hockey.
Sep 19, 2019
5,381
8,432
Alberta
I would trade away Kane tbh. 5M in cap space can go a long way. And if he does go, I wouldn't be opposed to some meat on the 4th line.
Terrible idea unless it's part of a big package for a significant asset imo. A fully healthy Evander Kane is a massive headache for opposing teams in the playoffs. I certainly wouldn't throw Kane out like a bunch of people want to for some reason.
 

Dirk Dangler

Registered User
Jun 24, 2016
123
231
I would trade away Kane tbh. 5M in cap space can go a long way. And if he does go, I wouldn't be opposed to some meat on the 4th line.
If you want to free up cap space from the forward group, it’s Skinner or RV. Kane brings a dimension that the team lacks.

Skinner has control, but if you tell him he’s the odd man out maybe he waves. If not, RV has no protection.
 

foshizzle

Registered User
Feb 1, 2007
5,729
5,176
Terrible idea unless it's part of a big package for a significant asset imo. A fully healthy Evander Kane is a massive headache for opposing teams in the playoffs. I certainly wouldn't throw Kane out like a bunch of people want to for some reason.

Why is it a terrible idea? The oilers made it to the finals largely without him, and they are doing fine this year.
 

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
15,788
17,775
Why is it a terrible idea? The oilers made it to the finals largely without him, and they are doing fine this year.

You must have missed the impact he had in the Nuck series in particular. We don't win that series without him.

It's a terrible idea because he's a productive player, on a contract that is easily in line with his value, is a solid playoff performer, and he brings several elements we lack. Theorizing about what we could do with the $5M in cap space is insane when the $5M he takes up is easily worth it.

If it's part of a larger more foundational move next year then sure, maybe. But that's it.
 

VeteranPresence

Registered User
Aug 13, 2024
626
1,051
Why is it a terrible idea? The oilers made it to the finals largely without him, and they are doing fine this year.

Not to mention Evander will need a ton of time to shake off the rust PLUS may not be as effective as before even in the best of cases. His surgeries were no joke and at his age it's an even bigger hill to climb. We're also pretty loaded on the wings right now so it will be tough for him to get ice time in situations where he's most effective (that is, with premier linemates).

I think if there's a deal out there to improve the team and Kane's cap is what makes it work, you have to look seriously at it. I especially don't want to have $5M in dead cap next year if he's healthy enough to play but not healthy enough to be the player he once was. We have to operate more like Vegas and not be afraid to cut bait on guys as they enter their twilight years. It's why they win.
 

Dirk Dangler

Registered User
Jun 24, 2016
123
231
Why is it a terrible idea? The oilers made it to the finals largely without him, and they are doing fine this year.
Because the last time he was truly healthy for playoffs he was a top three player on the team. And he brings elements that our group lacks.
Versus Skinner and RV, who are basically the same type of player and have been made at least somewhat redundant by waiver wire pick ups and reclamation projects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oilhawks

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad