Not really. If the cap is 97M, we can fit both Rantanen(14) and Bouchard(10) if we move Kane and Arvid and Jeff Skinner is off the booksRantanen talk is just silly, never happening.
Not really. If the cap is 97M, we can fit both Rantanen(14) and Bouchard(10) if we move Kane and Arvid and Jeff Skinner is off the booksRantanen talk is just silly, never happening.
Some of you guys play too many video gamesNot really. If the cap is 97M, we can fit both Rantanen(14) and Bouchard(10) if we move Kane and Arvid and Jeff Skinner is off the books
Pitts won 2 cups by adding Phil Kessel. The salary cap also works out. The only issue is would Rantanen actually wants to sign here.Some of you guys play too many video games
I mean neither is most of the other stuff we talk about on here lolRantanen talk is just silly, never happening.
Ya, I usually stay out of this thread so it serves me right lol, play on boysI mean neither is most of the other stuff we talk about on here lol
I don't disagree, but a better 2C option improves the team, especially if one of McDrai ends up banged up and can't run their own line down the middleHistory has shown us that this is not a sustainable method to victory. They really need to break away from this.
That's... definitely one way to look at it.The offersheet of Holloway and Broberg is costing the Blues more players and assets than they know it and still miss the playoffs
This is a rumors and proposals thread, not complaining about our goalies even though that is 25 percent of the long winded comments on here.So we are top 5 on defensive statistics, including being number 1 in allowing the least amount of high danger scoring chances yet are 14th in save percentage and 18th in GSAx
Hmm and people think are goaltending isn't the issue esp when pickard looks just as good as Skinner or better on some nights
Bruh.... just accept they robbed us, Holloway is already a central backbone of their offense (on a measly $2.3M cap-hit) and Broberg while not without issues has acclimated pretty darn well to his enhanced role.The offersheet of Holloway and Broberg is costing the Blues more players and assets than they know it and still miss the playoffs
Greatly improved up to Calgary's favourite place. The "team is bad, but not bad enough to get good draft position" area.Bruh.... just accept they robbed us, Holloway is already a central backbone of their offense (on a measly $2.3M cap-hit) and Broberg while not without issues has acclimated pretty darn well to his enhanced role.
The Blues would be in the Anaheim / Nashville range of the standings if they didn't get those 2 off of us for next to nothing, it greatly improved the quality of their team.
Broberg hasn’t been good.Bruh.... just accept they robbed us, Holloway is already a central backbone of their offense (on a measly $2.3M cap-hit) and Broberg while not without issues has acclimated pretty darn well to his enhanced role.
The Blues would be in the Anaheim / Nashville range of the standings if they didn't get those 2 off of us for next to nothing, it greatly improved the quality of their team.
I would push back on Broberg. He's had a fine developmental year, and had a hot start. But him here at 4.5 million right now would be awful.Bruh.... just accept they robbed us, Holloway is already a central backbone of their offense (on a measly $2.3M cap-hit) and Broberg while not without issues has acclimated pretty darn well to his enhanced role.
The Blues would be in the Anaheim / Nashville range of the standings if they didn't get those 2 off of us for next to nothing, it greatly improved the quality of their team.
Holloway keeping his team and his favorite team close and dearGreatly improved up to Calgary's favourite place. The "team is bad, but not bad enough to get good draft position" area.
Didn't realize the Blues goal was to tank.Greatly improved up to Calgary's favourite place. The "team is bad, but not bad enough to get good draft position" area.
Pretty sure Bowman traded for Saad in Chicago?Skinner for Saad? Fits the team mold a bit better