It's always possible to get a third team involved also. Full retention would only be a bit over $1m over the next two years as his contract was frontloaded.
But just looking at it briefly, it's possible to do it at full clip and still add the defensive upgrade. It's the summer where things may get a bit dicey. I'd need our resident capologists to fact check though.
As for cost, I'd personally give up a fair bit for Sissons. Calling him a 7 point player is selling him short quite significantly. He's a better offensive player than Bjugstad was. And he'd be a primary PKer who would also be your RH faceoff ace.
Nuge - McD - Hyman
Kane - Drai - Podz
Janmark - Henrique - Brown
Skinner - Sissons - RV
Perry, Kapanen
Strategically it'd give your team four lines that don't require sheltering. They'd be an impossible team to line match. Ready to replace underperforming players or guys who go down with injury.
I just see Derek Ryan as a pretty significant weak area of our roster.
$$$$$$$$$$
I’m a big Matheson fan but losing kulak is counterproductiveI was listening to one of the eastern radio stations on Iheartradio while I was working(for noise in the back) and they were running down players they expected to move and Matthieson's name came up and they mentioned that they heard Edmonton has been looking at him for awhile but money was an issue.
If the oilers are after Matthieson(which I still do not like) Kulak will need to go back the other way to help off set some of Matthiesons contract
No question he is a volume shooter. NHL edge gives a clearer picture. 17 of his 78 shots would be from areas considered "outside".His shots are still more to the outside as he shoots from everywhere as I said. He’s a volume shooter who shoots from everywhere just like this chart shows.
Wait but why Kulak? Find a way to offload Jeff Skinner if possibleI was listening to one of the eastern radio stations on Iheartradio while I was working(for noise in the back) and they were running down players they expected to move and Matthieson's name came up and they mentioned that they heard Edmonton has been looking at him for awhile but money was an issue.
If the oilers are after Matthieson(which I still do not like) Kulak will need to go back the other way to help off set some of Matthiesons contract
Wasn’t pointing out you, just in general.I’m just saying he’s a volume shooter. I am not complaining that he doesn’t shoot. Anyway, I’ve had enough of this forum for a year. I’ll talk to you guys next year. Have a great Christmas.
Maybe here?I read somewhere that Stauff said that we were looking at Trent Frederick?
They're just stealing my idea from like a month ago.Maybe here?
Tough Bruins Forward Linked to Edmonton Oilers in Trade By Multiple Insiders
All season the Edmonton Oilers have been in the trade market for a top four defenceman, but new reports have connected the Oilers to bottom six center Trent Frederic of the Boston Bruins.www.yardbarker.com
Seems fun but I don't get it
The hint seems to be that it would be Jeff Skinner straight across for Frederic. Is this just Bob's fantasy or would Boston actually do this?
Often get fog right there as well I’ve noticed over the years.You know your roads. Commuted to Joffre one year. Just south of red deer to the inisfail hill is challenging in winter.
edit: mistake
Wait but why Kulak? Find a way to offload Jeff Skinner if possible
They might think about it, they're desperate for more offenseMaybe here?
Tough Bruins Forward Linked to Edmonton Oilers in Trade By Multiple Insiders
All season the Edmonton Oilers have been in the trade market for a top four defenceman, but new reports have connected the Oilers to bottom six center Trent Frederic of the Boston Bruins.www.yardbarker.com
Seems fun but I don't get it
The hint seems to be that it would be Jeff Skinner straight across for Frederic. Is this just Bob's fantasy or would Boston actually do this?
Skinner should be untouchable even if he ends up in the press box. We need him to keep the streak alive of ex Sabres winning the cup.As we have argued and debated.. Skinner has a NMC and not many people believe he will waive it for a non playoff team rebuilding
Can't we just trade for Dahlin or Cozens at the deadline instead?Skinner should be untouchable even if he ends up in the press box. We need him to keep the streak alive of ex Sabres winning the cup.
Could give them a bump to their PP and give us some much needed grit in our bottom 6.Maybe here?
Tough Bruins Forward Linked to Edmonton Oilers in Trade By Multiple Insiders
All season the Edmonton Oilers have been in the trade market for a top four defenceman, but new reports have connected the Oilers to bottom six center Trent Frederic of the Boston Bruins.www.yardbarker.com
Seems fun but I don't get it
The hint seems to be that it would be Jeff Skinner straight across for Frederic. Is this just Bob's fantasy or would Boston actually do this?
As someone who lives in Ottawa, you're right. No one comes in from out of town to see Sens games unless it's Leafs or Habs fans, and the Sens are playing them. It's hard to get people in Ottawa to go unless they're winning, and even them sometimes. It's just not that kind of sports town for whatever reason. Perhaps a downtown arena will help, because that arena is way out there. I used to live in Kanata, and going to a game was pretty easy, but if you live in centretown, or good forbid, the east end, it is a crazy trek, with really bad traffic.I lived in Kingston for two years without a car. I also commuted to both TO and Ottawa regularly. What you are describing is casual travel not commuting. Via from Toronto to Ottawa is a complete crapshoot at the best of times, but it is definitely not a viable option for going to games regularly. The average trip is about 4 1/2 hours but it can easily be 6 with any bad luck. (This is roughly how long it takes to drive if the weather is decent.) No one is going to do this to go to a hockey game on any regular basis.
I understand that Highway 2 can be bad at times especially around Red Deer but nothing like the roads between Toronto and Ottawa on any regular basis. Snow squalls and freezing rain are far more common than really bad weather between Edmonton and Calgary. (I don't think the David Thompson is a natural route to take to go to a hockey game). Plus you need to deal with getting out of Toronto. The traffic until the other side of Oshawa is far worse than anything you will ever see on the QE2. If the weather is acting up at all the 401 becomes a parking lot.
The other issue you have is that the Leafs dominate Ontario hockey until you get to at least Kingston and then you are starting to get to Hab's territory. Montreal is even worse. They only care about the Habs period!!!!! When I was in Kingston no one I knew really cared about the Sens. If they were going to make a trek to see hockey they were either heading to Toronto or to Montreal.
Call up Savoie?Skinner should be untouchable even if he ends up in the press box. We need him to keep the streak alive of ex Sabres winning the cup.
It's possible you missed the point of the post you quoted. Savoie was a Sabre.He's not the answer
My bad. I understand. He's probably no worse than Skinner lolIt's possible you missed the point of the post you quoted. Savoie was a Sabre.