I get this perspective but it's not about "blame". It's that Emberson failed to see an opportunity and make the most of it. Now that the Emberson experiment failed its time to move on and find someone else.
Also Emberson hasn't looked good in a bottom pairing role either, so at some point you have to look at the player and be disappointed in them.
I agree but usage matters.
If a player isnt being utilized properly it severely limits that players ability to suceed.
Playing a player like Emberson (who only has 30 games of NHL experience) in a 2nd pairing RHD spot and partnering him with an essentially useless mentor like Nurse is not in any way conducive to success.
Playing such an inexperienced player against the other teams best and 2nd best players (with a tire fire for a partner) is not going to boost Embersons confidence at all. Its going to undermine it.
So the team essentially messed with Emberson and then moved him down and many on this board see that small sample size being representative of the player.
My position...pump the brakes a bit and let Emberson settle in (appropriately) in a bottom pairing role and see how he does.
Judging the player without factoring in that he was misussed in the first couple of games and then hasnt settled in on the bottom pairing is a bit premature IMO.
He is a young player on a new team and his new team didnt use him properly at all in the first couple of games.
Give him time to settle in.
The real issue here for me is that this team had its collective head up its ass thinking that it could use Emberson as a 2nd pairing RHD in the first place.