McShogun99
Registered User
He did sign it. Unfortunately it was for 4.6 million....If only it were EA Sports and he could force Broberg to sign a contract.
He did sign it. Unfortunately it was for 4.6 million....If only it were EA Sports and he could force Broberg to sign a contract.
A thread with 14 posts is considered some kind of evidence to you? Ironic, yes, that an org that is pure shit at prospect development also lost Lavoie since. How the f*** is it hindsight to mention Broberg had a sublime playoffs and all teams noticed that and were watching with anticipation?
The Oilers f***ed this over. The required copium here is to stick heads in sand and ignore it happened.
Blues offer sheeting the player and obtaining him must be hindsight too. The world is hindsightClaiming that we should have dropped Desharnais in the middle of last season to give Broberg a spot is the definition of hindsight. Saying "but he was good in the playoffs!!!" is hindsight.
"We should have got rid of Desharnais instead!" appears to be your argument, which is completely hindsight based.
Blues offer sheeting the player and obtaining him must be hindsight too. The world is hindsight
Look several teams were drooling at the prospect that the Oilers were sleepwalking on the player and were lining up to get him to sign an offersheet. Blues had enough Savvy to co-offersheet Holloway to get on radar making it a double whammy.
The Oilers are awful at retaining/developing prospects. How is this even up for debate?
No, the discussion is on losing Broberg outright, to an offersheet, and losing a prospec of value and keeping other negligible D instead.You're moving the goalposts.
The discussion was about the opportunity Broberg got here, and how the organization f***ed it up. My argument was that he never did enough to justify a spot in the NHL until this playoff, when it basically became too late due to contractual circumstance. Then I was told that it was nonsense, and that Desharnais should have been shipped out last year to give him a chance. That opinion is solely, 100% supported by hindsight and hindsight only.
If anything, we should have given Broberg less time in the NHL, not more. He died on the vine here with players justifiably playing ahead of him in the lineup. He probably doesn't perform well in the playoffs this year had he not gone down and actually rounded his game out in Bakersfield this year. The suggestion that he would have just been that good had we handed him that spot in November is far, far, far out of left field.
It’s not hindsight, plenty of people were calling to move Kulak to save cap and give Broberg that spot.Contending teams don't trade off the sure thing (Kulak) who ups his game and is impactful every single playoff so they can hope and pray that a soft, oft injured, inconsistent (generously) d man can just take it from there. Especially when you have a total wild card in Nurse ahead of him. Kulak can step up into more minutes when it matters if Nurse falters (and did just that this last playoff), Broberg at that point couldn't. Broberg showed absolutely nothing at that point in his career that would have lead anyone to think that this would make sense.
Your post is loaded with hindsight. Guy plays 3 good games in the playoffs and now we're dumb that we didn't ship everyone off two years ago to accommodate him.
No, the discussion is on losing Broberg outright, to an offersheet, and losing a prospec of value and keeping other negligible D instead.
"Died on the vine" jebus.
Not gonna agree on this one at all.
It’s not hindsight, plenty of people were calling to move Kulak to save cap and give Broberg that spot.
And yeah…. Contending teams definitely don’t trade away the sure thing (Ceci) so they can hope and pray (Emberson, Stecher, Dermott).
Never happens.
No, no it isn't. Go look at the post of mine you quoted and jumped in on.
Most people would probably say that an undeveloped player that was splitting time between the press box and 10 minutes a night on his off side in the NHL is dying on the vine, but whatever.
I can tell you're in the mode where nothing computes, so I'll leave it there.
To save cap. Not because Broberg was better, or earned the spot. To save cap.
Lol because Ceci is a sure thing. You bet.
This is my first reply to you:No, no it isn't. Go look at the post of mine you quoted and jumped in on.
Most people would probably say that an undeveloped player that was splitting time between the press box and 10 minutes a night on his off side in the NHL is dying on the vine, but whatever.
I can tell you're in the mode where nothing computes, so I'll leave it there.
To save cap. Not because Broberg was better, or earned the spot. To save cap.
Lol because Ceci is a sure thing. You bet.
meh, no different than people around here calling Broberg's play in the playoffs a "fluke" and "but his advance stats suck!"I remember last year (or maybe 2 years ago) I said that from talking to people in the Oil organization they were very high on Broberg, and he was often one of their best D in practice, but they thought that he lacked confidence in games. But they were very high on him.
I got a lot of posters coming after me for that pretty innocuous statement saying "well if he cant do it in games then he's useless, bustberg, etc".
My how the turntables...
It was obvious Desharnais was only here due to being a Woodcrap favorite. What org plays a nothing D like that over a real talent. You and others keep saying Bro was given all the chances and yet he's a D, and young D take time to develop, and its worth the squeeze taking that time.
Claiming that we should have dropped Desharnais in the middle of last season to give Broberg a spot is the definition of hindsight. Saying "but he was good in the playoffs!!!" is hindsight.
"We should have got rid of Desharnais instead!" appears to be your argument, which is completely hindsight based.
meh. A lot of the stats are who he was on ice with based are they not?Desharnais his his limitations (agility) but he was literally one of the best 5v5 defensive defensemen in the league the last two years.
He was 11th !!! in the entire league for expected goals against/60 mins of EV play last year.
Over the past two years combined, he has a 55% EV goal share, that's good for 38th in the entire league
Lots of other metrics say the same... heck the eye test said the same.
It's pretty clear you could game plan around him in the playoffs, as I said, he's got limitations in transition, but he's an exceptional defensive defenseman and can be a championship level role player. You need those guys.
Having said that, Broberg needed a push... it was absolutely wild how few injuries we had on the blue line last year... knocks on wood.
I'm not going to pretend that I was a huge Broberg fan- I had some questions about his hockey sense all along- but the way they handled him never made any sense to me.I remember last year (or maybe 2 years ago) I said that from talking to people in the Oil organization they were very high on Broberg, and he was often one of their best D in practice, but they thought that he lacked confidence in games. But they were very high on him.
I got a lot of posters coming after me for that pretty innocuous statement saying "well if he cant do it in games then he's useless, bustberg, etc".
My how the turntables...
The irony of Broberg's handling is that he showed a strong sustained NHL third pairing run with Bouchard prior to the Ekholm trade. They were a very strong young third pair playing against realistic NHL competition (what bizarrely some posters called 'butter soft' at the time while most realists understand this as smart development).
Everything changed with the Ekholm trade, positively for the team and Bouchard, but closed the NHL path at left defense and fed the fool's gold belief they could just move Broberg to his off-shooting side. More foolish was thinking they could accelerate his NHL development at 2RD playing middle pair responsibilities. Even though Broberg also showed snapshots in his rookie year of playing off-d side with a huge stretch drive game in Calgary with Barrie hurt and team chasing a wildcard spot. Broberg rolled off a 22:34 toi game with 2:43 PP and 2:09 PK and 0+/- in a 3-1 loss. Showed well his first month in North America with some big minute games when Nurse and Keith were hurt notably 23:34 toi in a hostile Vegas rink.
The Truth Speakers opinion about the player: Ekholm is getting progress reports about Broberg and is pleased with what he’s heard. “I’ve said it from Day 1 since I saw him in practice and play, I think it’s just a matter of time before he figures it out,” Ekholm said. “He’s got every attribute that a top-four — or even top-two — defenceman in this league needs.”
ROSTER REDUX: Philip Broberg | Edmonton Oilers
EdmontonOilers.com continues its 'Roster Redux' series looking at Philip Broberg's season as he looks to secure a full-time roster spot in '23-24www.nhl.com
In the Oilers victory over the Sharks the same night as the heaps of praise from his coach and teammates, Broberg would play a season high 18:44. Between Jan. 1 to Feb. 17, Broberg recorded six assists in 18 games while posting a plus-14 rating. Unfortunately for Broberg, his growth would eventually see a setback due to the addition of a former Condor and a fellow Swede.
"He's a great defenceman, great skater, can skate his way out of problems and moves the puck well as well," Bouchard said about playing with Broberg. "He makes things easy for me, talks well. I think now we're meshing well together."
"I think we've found some chemistry on the back end," Broberg said of his partnership with Bouchard. "Both of us can break the puck out well and skate well and be an offensive threat. It's been going really good so far, and we've just got to keep it going."
Vincent Desharnais emerged as a steady contributor for the Oilers in the latter half of the season, with his poise under pressure and massive wingspan helping Edmonton ratchet up their defence heading into the postseason. Broberg's partner in Bouchard found a larger role with the Oilers after Tyson Barrie was dealt to the Nashville Predators and veteran defender Mattias Ekholm joined the fray.
From March onward, Broberg suited up for just 11 regular season games and only played more than 10 minutes in four of those contests. He notched his only goal of the season in a 6-1 victory over the Sharks in Game 79 of the Oilers season. The young defenceman saw time in 10 of the Oilers 12 postseason games, but saw his ice time range from 9:49 to as little as 3:10, with Blue & Orange typically playing seven defenders.
Ken Holland famous last words after the Ekholm trade, "What's my message [to Broberg and other young prospects]? We're trying to win. I've got to figure out exactly how we get Philip Broberg from where he's at, to being a regular. I've got to sort that out.
The Oilers kicked this issue down the road. Did nothing. Ultimately lost him for peanuts after proving points in the hardest stage of competition.
My point is he had demonstrated a run of NHL ability with the Bouchard ten+ game run and anecdotally going back to the first month of his first pro season in North America. He owns accountability for his uneven development but took the final demotion and absolutely killed it. Then kept his head above water in Final 4 Stanley Cup playoffs.Thank you for an objective, factual synopsis of his time here.
Here's my unpopular opinion. Ceci is a better Dman then Kulak. Most of Ceci's career has been in a top 4 role where he's had good and bad moments. I posted around the offer sheet time that Ceci should stay because our RD is an area of weakness and they should trade Kulak for the extra cap and have Broberg in the 3rd pairing role. Under the current situation we could potentially not have Ekholm or Kulak on the team in 2 more seasons as well as an aging, declining Nurse with nothing in the pipeline to replace them.It’s not hindsight, plenty of people were calling to move Kulak to save cap and give Broberg that spot.
And yeah…. Contending teams definitely don’t trade away the sure thing (Ceci) so they can hope and pray (Emberson, Stecher, Dermott).
Never happens.
He did sign it. Unfortunately it was for 4.6 million....
Reading about how easily a 30 NHL game sample player on a league worst team would easily replace Ceci is one of the strangest things I've read online. Ceci's zone start deployment with the Oilers were all heavily weighted with disadvantaged defensive zone starts, 63.8, 59.7, 66.9, and 62.9. He and Nurse were fed hard goal suppression time and responsibilities over multiple coaches unfortunately too much with bled into their tendencies for inopertune breakdowns.Here's my unpopular opinion. Ceci is a better Dman then Kulak. Most of Ceci's career has been in a top 4 role where he's had good and bad moments. I posted around the offer sheet time that Ceci should stay because our RD is an area of weakness and they should trade Kulak for the extra cap and have Broberg in the 3rd pairing role. Under the current situation we could potentially not have Ekholm or Kulak on the team in 2 more seasons as well as an aging, declining Nurse with nothing in the pipeline to replace them.
We were also on-boarding Bouchard at the same time. We couldn’t afford to onboard both of them at the same time especially since Broberg struggled mightily when given opportunities.They still make room for their top prospects. Tampa found a way to fit in Sergachev with their stacked defence. The Oilers essentially choose a career 3rd pairing Dman over an 8th overall pick that was trending up each year. Every time Kulak stepped into a 2nd pairing role he's failed miserably. He also made a complete bonehead play on the Cup winning goal. If management looked at the bigger picture you keep Broberg over Kulak. You can get players like that every year at the deadline or UFA but good luck trying to get a potential young, top pairing D like Broberg.
Panthers players were raving about Broberg after the series, apparently JJ didn't get the memo.