McShogun99
Registered User
I'd believe that because Treveling is the Leafs GM. The trade is one for one.The talk around here is Pesce for Nylander close to straightup.
I'd believe that because Treveling is the Leafs GM. The trade is one for one.The talk around here is Pesce for Nylander close to straightup.
I don't mind Holloway, but we're not at the time in this teams life cycle to give raw rookies top 6 minutes just for shits and giggles.Honestly I dont mind Holloway and Lavoie/Bourgault being filler on a 2nd/3rd line.
Kane - McDavid - Brown
Holloway - Drai - Hyman
Foegele - Nuge - Bourgault/Lavoie
Janmark - McLeod - Ryan
Not ideal but still one of the best forward cores in the league. Worst case scenario based on what we have heard we sign a depth forward play Nuge in the top 6 and that would kick Bourgault/Lavoie off the team.
What are they trading to acquire Saros? The ask would be astronomical.Acquiring Pesce or a goalie like Saros should be top priority.
Fair but it is flat cap.I don't mind Holloway, but we're not at the time in this teams life cycle to give raw rookies top 6 minutes just for shits and giggles.
Hard no imo to Lavoie or Borgault at those spots, imo.
??? What do you mean? The Retention, that's literally a minimum requirement, unless they just want to have their team buy him out. It doesn't matter if they "don't want that" He's not Connor McDavid, he'll have to be retained.some SJ fans are refusing to accept that as a done deal.
I actually think that's not a great deal for the Leafs, and I assume Pesce walks after being acquired.f*** the Leafs
Pittsburgh is currently over the cap on 22 contracts, most of their team has NMC's or NTC. What would a trade for Karlsson even look like?
Hea been arguably their best forward, and they're treating him like shit IMO.??? What do you mean? The Retention, that's literally a minimum requirement, unless they just want to have their team buy him out. It doesn't matter if they "don't want that" He's not Connor McDavid, he'll have to be retained.
I actually think that's not a great deal for the Leafs, and I assume Pesce walks after being acquired.
I get they've always viewed him as "the other guy", but Nylander has really put up for that team.
You might be on to something here.I imagine a deal would include Petry and Granlund as dumps back. Then the Sharks only need to retain what... 250k? Add some picks/prospects from the Pens and the Sharks save $17M down the line because Petry/Granlunds deals are 2 years shorter.
GotchaI read he already signed in the KHL.
on the main board there is a few sharks that will die on the hill of no retention??? What do you mean? The Retention, that's literally a minimum requirement, unless they just want to have their team buy him out. It doesn't matter if they "don't want that" He's not Connor McDavid, he'll have to be retained.
I actually think that's not a great deal for the Leafs, and I assume Pesce walks after being acquired.
I get they've always viewed him as "the other guy", but Nylander has really put up for that team.
Supposedly Nylander wants $10M+. Matthews want a 3-5 year deal probably at $13M+. That would give them 4 forwards over $10M next year (around $45-47M in total) with a defense that is put together with Band-Aids.Hea been arguably their best forward, and they're treating him like shit IMO.
They don't matter. No team is taking on the full contract with no retention.on the main board there is a few sharks that will die on the hill of no retention
What’s everyone think of Denis Gurianov? Scored 20 goals a few years ago and has wheels. Could be had for under 1,000,000
Why are we penciling in Holloway like he's guaranteed to be a difference maker on the bottom 6. If Gurianov is willing to sign for cheap, you do it.
Forgot about that gestating trade for DeAngelo. Carolina seems all over the map with their big money bet on a 30+ Orlov which is uncharacteristic for them; a nice retention deal pending with DeAngelo and the speculation around Karlsson while seemingly holding the financial line on Pesce. All while defense is a core strength of a team that didn't score enough in the playoffs.Not just Burns but supposedly Deangelo is coming as well. Not a lot of ice time to go around for RHD's.
I guess that would work if Petry would be willing to waive. SJ would not be the worst place for him to sail into the sunset. They could also flip him I suppose. He's still got some game left.I imagine a deal would include Petry and Granlund as dumps back. Then the Sharks only need to retain what... 250k? Add some picks/prospects from the Pens and the Sharks save $17M down the line because Petry/Granlunds deals are 2 years shorter.
Add in Tarasenko at $3-4M. It seems to me that some teams don't actually believe that there is a salary cap.Forgot about that gestating trade for DeAngelo. Carolina seems all over the map with their big money bet on a 30+ Orlov which is uncharacteristic for them; a nice retention deal pending with DeAngelo and the speculation around Karlsson while seemingly holding the financial line on Pesce. All while defense is a core strength of a team that didn't score enough in the playoffs.
Karlsson is a very hard thread the needle trade to make. Strange days.
That configuration does not even make sense. Your two worst top-4 guys in terms of actually defending paired together? And then the guy you want on the ice like 23 minutes a night in Ekholm, all ES and PK, is going to need to have Broberg play that many minutes as well? Unless they're going 11-7 nightly where Broberg and Vinny share minutes with Ekholm, but even then I don't see how this works unless one of Nurse or Bouchard take massive leap forward as a defender.Holland should be fired if he goes into the season with a $6M bottom pairing.
11-7 through the regular season is Pejorative Slured in my opinion. What a way to tire out your star players. This team has to be built 12-6 like any other team in the history of the league.
Haha. That is true. The beautiful thing about well run organizations is that they often have quality depth talent that can be spun off before the clock strikes midnight for cap compliance. Per your speculation if I'm Carolina I would look at a Pesce+ deal for Nylander over free agent Tarasenko. Looks like Treliving is drawing his line in the sand with Nylander while re-shaping this team to have higher compete support forwards like Bertuzzi and ... I guess Domi maybe fits that...I guess that would work if Petry would be willing to waive. SJ would not be the worst place for him to sail into the sunset. They could also flip him I suppose. He's still got some game left.
Granlund is an interesting case. He goes from buyout candidate to stud and back on an almost yearly basis.
Add in Tarasenko at $3-4M. It seems to me that some teams don't actually believe that there is a salary cap.