Small sample size but maybe a sign of good thingsAnd again, this small sample size proves... what, exactly?
Small sample size but maybe a sign of good thingsAnd again, this small sample size proves... what, exactly?
Those teams also have significantly better management than we do and wouldn't have signed Jack Campbell to his braindead contract to begin with.You yourself were crying a page ago Crosby, Ovechkin, MacKinnon, Eichel having Cups, do tell how many Cups do you think that group has with .901 and .899 Stuart Skinner in net during their Cup drives?
Zero quite probably. Maaaaaybe that Colorado team that was so loaded out the wazoo that they didn't really need a good goalie, but the others ... they don't win shit.
They win nothing. Nothing for Crosby, nothing for Ovechkin, nothing for Eichel, that's for damn sure.
Those guys all needed outstanding goaltending, not just decent, outstanding to win their Cups.
I just did. Sort that chart out and look above (b/c Skinner is down at the bottom with Georgev and Ingram all of the time)There's more to hockey than who ends up on the "Top ten saves of the month" list. Because those don't show you some of the laughers he lets in.
Okay, present a reasonable acquisition target.
.925 from... what?
But again, why does five games this year suddenly erase the 5 years worth of proven data that has shown Gibson hasn't been good?Small sample size but maybe a sign of good things
Those teams also have significantly better management than we do and wouldn't have signed Jack Campbell to his braindead contract to begin with.
And then Dustin Schwartz rears his ugly head and scouts James Reimer and we're back to square one.I just did. Sort that chart out and look above (b/c Skinner is down at the bottom with Georgev and Ingram all of the time)
Any goalie we get (if we get one) will have some bad games. The key is how many bad games compared to good ones?
I come from a more agressive standpoint that Skinner is a lost cause. I will take almost anyone over him.
Give me Blackwood, Gibson, f*** I will take Jake Allen (he is 7th in save%AE. Call Nashville see if they want to dump Saros in a blockbuster. I would beg Cam Talbot to come back if Detroit would trade him. I will take Vladar. I will take Blomqvist
I know goalies are "Voodoo", but watching them play in net, how they move, how they track pucks, how they react is not some science. The eyeballs, if they are working, shows us. Skinner is like playing Russian Roulette in net.
Funny that you compare goalies within teams. Because John Gibson frequently got outperformed by the likes of Anthony Stolarz and Lukas Dostal these past 5 years.
Well yeah I'm sure it will come down some because he plays a on a shit team.
Skinner wouldn't even be in the NHL right now if he was on the Anaheim Ducks. He'd be washed out of the league like Ben Scrivens did.
These are not all equal. Blackwood and Allen (if he's retained) don't completely screw up the rest of your roster. Gibson does. You can't just pretend that doesn't matter.I just did. Sort that chart out and look above (b/c Skinner is down at the bottom with Georgev and Ingram all of the time)
Any goalie we get (if we get one) will have some bad games. The key is how many bad games compared to good ones?
I come from a more agressive standpoint that Skinner is a lost cause. I will take almost anyone over him.
Give me Blackwood, Gibson, f*** I will take Jake Allen (he is 7th in save%AE. Call Nashville see if they want to dump Saros in a blockbuster. I would beg Cam Talbot to come back if Detroit would trade him. I will take Vladar. I will take Blomqvist
I know goalies are "Voodoo", but watching them play in net, how they move, how they track pucks, how they react is not some science. The eyeballs, if they are working, shows us. Skinner is like playing Russian Roulette in net.
If you want Gibson to have .925 thru 50 games then the Oilers won't be able to afford him. It's that simpleBut again, why does five games this year suddenly erase the 5 years worth of proven data that has shown Gibson hasn't been good?
Why do you always bring up Dustin when somebody replies lol.And then Dustin Schwartz rears his ugly head and scouts James Reimer and we're back to square one.
Because he's the goalie scout. He's the reason why we blew our load on Jack Campbell, and the reason that basically every goalie we've acquired since his hiring has gradually turned into shit.Why do you always bring up Dustin when somebody replies lol.
I will take a goalie here playing well for 2 years and then getting Dustin'd. It's better than what we have now.
You're gambling on an extremely small sample size when the much larger sample size prior to that would indicate this is a complete mirage.If you want Gibson to have .925 thru 50 games then the Oilers won't be able to afford him. It's that simple
I actually wouldn't mind taking a flier on some of these low pedigree goalies with solid stats like Dostal/Stolarz/Daccord/Vladar etc. Probably wouldn't cost much in prospect/draft capital either. I just want nothing to do with John Gibson.It's not like these are bad goaltenders either, for what is worth. Dostal is arguably the best goaltender in the league, and Stolarz is making Skinner look like a joke this season.
View attachment 937056
That's the whole point of the discussion. Gibson likely going to cost something small right now even with retentionBecause he's the goalie scout. He's the reason why we blew our load on Jack Campbell, and the reason that basically every goalie we've acquired since his hiring has gradually turned into shit.
You're gambling on an extremely small sample size when the much larger sample size prior to that would indicate this is a complete mirage.
With the extremely large chance of no payoff.That's the whole point of the discussion. Gibson likely going to cost something small right now even with retention
It's not like these are bad goaltenders either, for what is worth. Dostal is arguably the best goaltender in the league, and Stolarz is making Skinner look like a joke this season.
View attachment 937056
Now if you scroll down a couple pages...
View attachment 937058
If you want Gibson to have .925 thru 50 games then the Oilers won't be able to afford him. It's that simple
The Oilers are in the playoffs race right now with the worse goaltendingWith the extremely large chance of no payoff.
What does that have to do with anything. The point is his libemates here would have a combined 4 goals.McLeod's most common linemates in Buffalo are Jordan Greenway and Jason Zucker. He has also played a grand total of 9 minutes more 5v5 than Henrique has this year.
He would also be cheaper, way better defensively(though Adam isn't that bad), and probably the teams top Penalty Killing option.
This is absolutely true FWIW and it's also not like you can just ignore the trade return in practice the way I did in my post.
Right, but again Gibson's body of work the last few years would indicate that he's not an upgrade on what we currently have, especially assuming we're sending Skinner the other way. We're trading one bad goalie for another, only with a higher cap hit and the possibility of more spent assets.The Oilers are in the playoffs race right now with the worse goaltending
Any goalie is an upgrade on the last place goalie.Right, but again Gibson's body of work the last few years would indicate that he's not an upgrade on what we currently have, especially assuming we're sending Skinner the other way. We're trading one bad goalie for another, only with a higher cap hit and the possibility of more spent assets.
Oh, and that wonderful cap hit that bleeds into McDavid's extension years.
Including last year's last place goalie? That one?Any goalie is an upgrade on the last place goalie.
Yes last year last placed goalie is better than current last placed goalieIncluding last year's last place goalie? That one?
Including last year's last place goalie? That one?