Game. Set. Match.Campbell and his .875 sv% with -0.610 GSAx/60 sewered the team last year, but Skinner and his 0.876 sv% with -0.769 GSAx/60 this year is totally fine?
Nailed it. Nothing else needs to be said.
Game. Set. Match.Campbell and his .875 sv% with -0.610 GSAx/60 sewered the team last year, but Skinner and his 0.876 sv% with -0.769 GSAx/60 this year is totally fine?
Like who is that poster thats never been seen here before.Stan, is that you?
Too bad that post misses the pont entirely, It doesnt even address anything I said.Game. Set. Match.
Nailed it. Nothing else needs to be said.
Too bad that post misses the pont entirely, It doesnt even address anything I said.
Its a strawman post.
LOL...he was responding to my post and his response was incoherant.Who cares if he addresses your points, when the one HE made is devastating to the argument that Skinner is not a massive liability?
I wonder if there were any Oilers scouts at the Ducks game tonight.Gibson loses 3-2 in OT to Buffalo
Now 3-1 (he has played lower teams though)
900%+ in 3 of his 4 starts
2 more 0.900 starts and he ties Skinner.
2.67GAA and 0.906 in his 4 games
This is not the droid were after.I wonder if there were any Oilers scouts at the Ducks game tonight.
...and because Jack Campbell was too shitty to be an NHL goalie.
At the end of the day I think that we are on the same page.Jack Campbell is well and gone. Current management should not have been fooled into thinking Skinner was a capable starter. He was far too uneven last year and nearly single-handedly choked away the series vs the Canucks.
They had the cap to address getting a capable goalie this off-season.
Gibson’s injury proneness scares me. Lots of talk earlier in the day he’d waive for the Oilers, so seeing he got the start tonight, having a pair of scouts at the game would stoke the rumour fire a bit.This is not the droid were after.
His mechanics are not fairly good.Unfortunately we have to rely on Mr. Schwartkoff to rebuild Skinner's mind at this point.
Stuart could have been and still could be a quality backup. Consistency was always a battle but his mechanics are fairly good.
From about the middle of last year i would agree with this.His mechanics are not fairly good.
Positionally he’s average and his save selection in terms of how he chooses to face and stop shots is amongst the worst.
His crease movement is horrendous to the point where I don’t think he’s even capable of pushing off the post.
Our pro scouting has been nothing short of pathetic.Gibson’s injury proneness scares me. Lots of talk earlier in the day he’d waive for the Oilers, so seeing he got the start tonight, having a pair of scouts at the game would stoke the rumour fire a bit.
We already have a Rumors and Trade Proposals thread. No need to make another thread.View attachment 934384
According to Pierre LeBrun; Johnny Gibson is willing to waive his No-Trade clause for Edmonton Oilers.
What do you think about that?
Me too and I was pretty excited about it. Not so much because I think Gibson is a good goalie but because a change would prove the Oilers are aware they have a problem and are interested in addressing it. Kind of like what they did last year with Campbell. But alas, still no evidence that this is the case. Shame on the OP, whoever he is. I’ve never seen him on this board before.When I saw the thread title I thought it was a done deal, but it’s not. Fake news.
Yup I thought the same!When I saw the thread title I thought it was a done deal, but it’s not. Fake news.