Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | The Oilers Biggest Roster Need Is?

Oilers Biggest Roster Need?

  • 2nd Pairing RD

    Votes: 50 42.4%
  • Starting Goalie

    Votes: 63 53.4%
  • Top 6 LW (RNH, Podkolzin and Jeff Skinner Aren't Getting it Done)

    Votes: 2 1.7%
  • Top 6 RW (Arvidsson and Hyman Aren't Getting it Done)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3C

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Physical Bottom 6 Wingers

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • Other (Post Your Opinion)

    Votes: 2 1.7%

  • Total voters
    118

oobga

Tier 2 Fan
Aug 1, 2003
25,027
21,358
I think Nuge would have had to cover for both his D there and just be all alone playing defense.

This is just what happens when you have to break up the dream team of Nurse+Kulak. Get another LHD Bowman.
 

bucks_oil

Registered User
Aug 25, 2005
8,752
5,139
The puck went 5-hole and he played very poorly.

That wasn't Stamkos or Forsberg coming down, that was Cole Smith and he got in very tight, takeaway the bottom of the net and make a guy beat you, basic goaltending stuff, especially for a guy with some size (I am short and was always a short goalie)

To be frank, that looked like a goal let in by a mainly AHL goalie. It's like Nurse's goal that Wedgewood let in, Nurse made a good shot, but he has to have that covered at this level.

It's the same for Pickard here.
Ummm...

But he IS mainly an AHL goalie. That's part of my point. We aren't paying for consistent high-level goaltending, but fans are still bitching for it.

You cannot accept huge investments in offense, that has generally not been scoring and turn around and bitch about the bargain basement goalies.

The responsibility lies with the people we've invested the big money in. McD and Drai have started doing their thing (and thus we've started winning), but Nurse, Nuge, Hyman, J. Skinner, Arvidsson, Henrique, even Bouchard... those are the guys who are not performing up to expectations and up to their level of pay.

Pickard did exactly what we asked of him, which is arguably more than he's paid to do. He batted 0.900, he let in a breakaway and a deflection, and he won. And everyone is trying to scapegoat him for dampening the mood on Mc-1000 night.

It doesn't make any sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rec28

guymez

The Seldom Seen Kid
Mar 3, 2004
34,602
15,173
Ummm...

But he IS mainly an AHL goalie. That's part of my point. We aren't paying for consistent high-level goaltending, but fans are still bitching for it.

You cannot accept huge investments in offense, that has generally not been scoring and turn around and bitch about the bargain basement goalies.

The responsibility lies with the people we've invested the big money in. McD and Drai have started doing their thing (and thus we've started winning), but Nurse, Nuge, Hyman, J. Skinner, Arvidsson, Henrique, even Bouchard... those are the guys who are not performing up to expectations and up to their level of pay.

Pickard did exactly what we asked of him, which is arguably more than he's paid to do. He batted 0.900, he let in a breakaway and a deflection, and he won. And everyone is trying to scapegoat him for dampening the mood on Mc-1000 night.

It doesn't make any sense.
I agree with this which is why I am not part of the large contingent on here bashing the goalies every 2nd post.
The team paid for average goaltending and that is going to be the best it gets.

Thats also why I put more emphasis on players like Nurse. He has been better lately but when he is being paid as one of the top Dmen in the NHL then he should get plenty of heat when he plays like a 2nd pairing dman.
 

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
74,165
30,355
The Kulak-Nurse pairing has been really good, Nurse's numbers are outstanding the last 8 games,

2 goals, 5 assists, 7 points +7 in 8G, not much to complain about there.

There's no guarantee at all that any D acquired will be do any better.

Goaltending is the no.1 team need, with even average GSAA, the team would go to another level.
 

brentashton

Registered User
Jan 21, 2018
15,477
22,432
It seems like there is a new Broberg Speed on these boards.

IMG_8211.jpeg
 

Jimmi McJenkins

Sometimes miracles
Jan 12, 2006
78,665
41,646
Alberta
It seems like there is a new Broberg Speed on these boards.

View attachment 931148
What are you talking about? What's Stan doing to correct the concerns of the team.

The goaltending isn't providing enough, despite the team playing VERY good defense, there are goalies out there, what's Stan doing? Evaluating? Hoping for development?
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,679
32,927
Ontario
I feel like the obvious thing to do is to give Rodrigue a game or two the next time they have an injury and have to dip into LTIR.

He's been really good in Bako. Maybe he gives them a spark. Maybe he at least looks decent enough to be an attractive piece in a trade for a goalie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oilhawks

belair

Win it for Ben!
Apr 9, 2010
39,623
23,328
Canada
I feel like the obvious thing to do is to give Rodrigue a game or two the next time they have an injury and have to dip into LTIR.

He's been really good in Bako. Maybe he gives them a spark. Maybe he at least looks decent enough to be an attractive piece in a trade for a goalie.
The problem with that is that he'd have to clear waivers again if you wanted to send him back down.
 

CanadasTeam99

Registered User
Jul 22, 2024
1,607
1,689
The Kulak-Nurse pairing has been really good, Nurse's numbers are outstanding the last 8 games,

2 goals, 5 assists, 7 points +7 in 8G, not much to complain about there.

There's no guarantee at all that any D acquired will be do any better.

Goaltending is the no.1 team need, with even average GSAA, the team would go to another level.
Damn I have not even paid attention to how well Nurse is playing. This continuing is like having a new and improved traded for dman lol.

What are you talking about? What's Stan doing to correct the concerns of the team.

The goaltending isn't providing enough, despite the team playing VERY good defense, there are goalies out there, what's Stan doing? Evaluating? Hoping for development?
I HOPE that the guys up in management are talking the same way we are and seeing what we see. Playing good D, not getting enough goalie support. Make some calls. Probably still too early for guys to shake loose, but plant some seeds. THat's how we got Ekholm
 
  • Like
Reactions: TB12

VeteranPresence

Registered User
Aug 13, 2024
363
587
I feel like the obvious thing to do is to give Rodrigue a game or two the next time they have an injury and have to dip into LTIR.

He's been really good in Bako. Maybe he gives them a spark. Maybe he at least looks decent enough to be an attractive piece in a trade for a goalie.

I'm not against this per say but also every point matters right now. If we had started like the Jets did then okay, you put Olivier in for one night whenever and just see what happens. But I didn't like the looks of him even in pre-season. He was really terrible against Calgary (xGA 3.6, 5 GA) and Seattle (xGA 2, 6 GA) in particular.

I understand he's been good in the A this season and has shown year over year progress which is what you want out of any player. But he also just may be one of those "AAAA" guys who never translates his game to the Show. The only way to know is to play him I guess, but I don't think I'd do it before we've banked some more points and we need a better option than Skinner like yesterday.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,679
32,927
Ontario
I'm not against this per say but also every point matters right now. If we had started like the Jets did then okay, you put Olivier in for one night whenever and just see what happens. But I didn't like the looks of him even in pre-season. He was really terrible against Calgary (xGA 3.6, 5 GA) and Seattle (xGA 2, 6 GA) in particular.

I understand he's been good in the A this season and has shown year over year progress which is what you want out of any player. But he also just may be one of those "AAAA" guys who never translates his game to the Show. The only way to know is to play him I guess, but I don't think I'd do it before we've banked some more points and we need a better option than Skinner like yesterday.
Goalies are voodoo. I feel like it's always worth trying something because you never know.

Preseason can be a little too chaotic to get proper reads on guys too.
 

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
18,810
15,480
Edmonton
I feel like the obvious thing to do is to give Rodrigue a game or two the next time they have an injury and have to dip into LTIR.

He's been really good in Bako. Maybe he gives them a spark. Maybe he at least looks decent enough to be an attractive piece in a trade for a goalie.
The league seems to be trending towards quicker goalies now. Rodrigue fits that mold but he needs a shot to prove it first.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,679
32,927
Ontario
The league seems to be trending towards quicker goalies now. Rodrigue fits that mold but he needs a shot to prove it first.
Yeah. It feels like the Oilers give up few chances, but when they do it's on east-west passes and Skinner is statistically the worst goalie in the league on those.

A no-name guy with plus lateral mobility would likely outplay Skinner, IMO.
 

Yuke

Registered User
Jan 15, 2020
639
383
Newsflash: every team in the league gives up clear shooter on goalie opportunities. There's a reason why top 6 forwards in the NHL are as productive as they are. They know where to go to get open looks.
Is this where I call you Mr Obvious?

That's actually just straight false.

View attachment 931054

View attachment 931055


Basically everything is assumed to be a wide open look unless it's contested and then points taken away, and then points added if it's tipped.

Some models also just go by the xGoals of the chance, but it ends up at around the same spot - a HDSC is approximately 0.15 goals on average.
Well I stand corrected. I obviously read a shortened version of HDSC. Thanks for the info.
 

McTonyBrar

Registered User
Apr 2, 2018
19,509
21,239
On the Oil Stream today, Gazzola said David Pagnotta said last Saturday on Hello Hockey that Edmonton and David Savard may gain some traction.

I wouldn’t mind him if they retain a lot. I know a lot probably wouldn’t like that deal

I know the D has been pretty good but can be alot better. That is one reason why we have 8 loses. Saying goaltending is the reason and ignoring the D lapses is blind thinking.
Our D hasn’t been good. It’s better than we thought though…. So imagine how good it’ll be if we had actual top 4 Dman on the right side of Nurse
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,679
32,927
Ontario
On the Oil Stream today, Gazzola said David Pagnotta said last Saturday on Hello Hockey that Edmonton and David Savard may gain some traction.

I wouldn’t mind him if they retain a lot. I know a lot probably wouldn’t like that deal


Our D hasn’t been good. It’s better than we thought though…. So imagine how good it’ll be if we had actual top 4 Dman on the right side of Nurse
Savard has been horrendous playing top4 minutes. He's getting murdered by elite comp this year.

Savard vs elites:
88 minutes
38.7% DFF
30% GF

Kulak vs elites:
87 minutes
67.9% DFF
66.7% GF
 

McTonyBrar

Registered User
Apr 2, 2018
19,509
21,239
The Kulak-Nurse pairing has been really good, Nurse's numbers are outstanding the last 8 games,

2 goals, 5 assists, 7 points +7 in 8G, not much to complain about there.

There's no guarantee at all that any D acquired will be do any better.

Goaltending is the no.1 team need, with even average GSAA, the team would go to another level.
Disagree. Skinner always starts this way. This D core is not a Cup contender. Kulak playing two pairs literally? Heck no man.

We need a top 4 D. I don’t like how Skinner has been but I guarantee you we are not even looking for a goalie. We’re on the prowl for a Dman
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
38,028
18,968
Disagree. Skinner always starts this way. This D core is not a Cup contender. Kulak playing two pairs literally? Heck no man.

We need a top 4 D. I don’t like how Skinner has been but I guarantee you we are not even looking for a goalie. We’re on the prowl for a Dman
I actually agree there. Get Nurse a real partner! Kulak could be a great fill in for the meantime.

The only caveat I'd add is that there are interesting adds at goalie we could make who shouldn't be that hard to fit in in terms of cap and assets to get them. That Dman will be more expensive but we should get both
 
  • Like
Reactions: McTonyBrar

Oilhawks

Over Old Hills
Nov 24, 2011
28,773
52,182
On the Oil Stream today, Gazzola said David Pagnotta said last Saturday on Hello Hockey that Edmonton and David Savard may gain some traction.

I wouldn’t mind him if they retain a lot. I know a lot probably wouldn’t like that deal


Our D hasn’t been good. It’s better than we thought though…. So imagine how good it’ll be if we had actual top 4 Dman on the right side of Nurse

Savard is one step from the glue factory. Horrible acquisition and a waste of assets. Good thing Pagnotta knows nothing
 

Took a pill in Sbisa

2showToffoliIwascool
Apr 23, 2004
16,735
7,734
Australia
On the Oil Stream today, Gazzola said David Pagnotta said last Saturday on Hello Hockey that Edmonton and David Savard may gain some traction.

I wouldn’t mind him if they retain a lot. I know a lot probably wouldn’t like that deal


Our D hasn’t been good. It’s better than we thought though…. So imagine how good it’ll be if we had actual top 4 Dman on the right side of Nurse

Can anyone show me statistical evidence that Savard is a capable top-4 dman?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad