Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | The Oilers Biggest Roster Need Is?

Oilers Biggest Roster Need?

  • 2nd Pairing RD

    Votes: 85 40.3%
  • Starting Goalie

    Votes: 117 55.5%
  • Top 6 LW (RNH, Podkolzin and Jeff Skinner Aren't Getting it Done)

    Votes: 3 1.4%
  • Top 6 RW (Arvidsson and Hyman Aren't Getting it Done)

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • 3C

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Physical Bottom 6 Wingers

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • Other (Post Your Opinion)

    Votes: 4 1.9%

  • Total voters
    211

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
15,609
17,427
This is interesting. But can you post the actual GAR and goal production results list to give a fulsome outline to discuss wins above replacement. A critical component is usage and Bouchard is a vital part of a Stack Five deployment led by a historic great McDavid who tilts offensive zone time in NHL 99 percentile (50.5%).

I like Bouchard a lot and give younger D lots of rope in terms of development time and some wobbles in his game. He hasn't been as consistent this year reflected in PP results and his own challenges getting pucks through (he has significant # of blocks as well as missing the net).

Would like to see x- GAR against actual GAR to have a clearer picture of d-man performance.

A person with a functioning brain that actually understands analytics in context.

Refreshing.
 

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
15,609
17,427
Just need to see complete information before making declarative statements. As well laying of information which I suspect much is beyond the public realm.

The paired with McDavid phenomenon is real as far as impact on analytics goes.

Nurse being on the 5 man unit with McDavid for basically the entirety of the lockout year is pretty much why he's making $9M today.
 

ChaoticOrange

Registered User
Jun 29, 2008
51,588
31,463
Edmonton
This is hilarious coming from the clown that farts out a chart in an attempt to prove that Bouchard is the best D man in the NHL, while the likes of Kulak, Kulikov and Sandin are right there with him in the top 5.

And you call other people stupid.
Haven’t we been gushing about how good Kulak has been this year? That’s reflected in the numbers. Kulikov and Sandin have been great so far. See the rest of the list where there’s perennial Norris finalists? It’s a small sample size. What separates “shit” and great is the ability to do it over a whole season and long sustained stretches. Like Bouchard did last year. And most of this year.

Just you. And I called you a goober. Because you’re being one. One with zero evidence aside from having watched a few bad plays while evidently ignoring all of the good ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobias Kahun

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
15,609
17,427
Haven’t we been gushing about how good Kulak has been this year? That’s reflected in the numbers. Kulikov and Sandin have been great so far. See the rest of the list where there’s perennial Norris finalists? It’s a small sample size. What separates “shit” and great is the ability to do it over a whole season and long sustained stretches. Like Bouchard did last year. And most of this year.

Just you. And I called you a goober. Because you’re being one. One with zero evidence aside from having watched a few bad plays while evidently ignoring all of the good ones.

I can't help but laugh at the last sentence. "Zero evidence! Well other than the bad plays he's been making I guess."

Look above and you'll see how a non-idiot looks at analytics.

As “bad” defensively as Bouchard has been at times, he does his job. Skinjob? Doing his job is the exception, not the rule.

He isn't even "bad" defensively, he just has major, preventable brain fart moments at too high of a clip at the moment. It's like his timing and reads are off 5-10% in most parts of his game and it's leading to some bad games and bad moments.

He'll be good for 59 minutes, but wash a lot of it out with the abysmal 1 other minute some of the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oilhawks

stewy04

Registered User
Jun 19, 2016
402
601
I'm glad our team is good now haha.

I'm liking other names out there. Hopefully we can get a solid top 4!
 

oXo Cube

Power Play Merchant
Nov 4, 2008
11,341
12,256
In your closet
The paired with McDavid phenomenon is real as far as impact on analytics goes.

Nurse being on the 5 man unit with McDavid for basically the entirety of the lockout year is pretty much why he's making $9M today.

I'm not a subscriber to EvolvingHockey so I can't reply to the direct subject here(GAR) but Bouchard's advanced metrics don't really decline that much away from McDavid. he drops from a ~60% xG player to 58(still elite).

The red flag you're describing with Nurse doesn't exist with this player and never has.
 

CupofOil

Knob Flavored Coffey
Aug 20, 2009
48,689
45,658
NYC
Idk about this. Other teams have much better assets but do they want to spend those great assets for Jiricek?
Most teams have secondary assets that are better than the Oilers primary assets. Better prospects, current 1sts, better future 1sts, better expendable roster players. The Oilers just don't have the assets to pull off a trade for a top prospect which usually requires another top prospect and/or high draft picks of which the Oilers have very little of.
 

ChaoticOrange

Registered User
Jun 29, 2008
51,588
31,463
Edmonton
This is interesting. But can you post the actual GAR and goal production results list to give a fulsome outline to discuss wins above replacement. A critical component is usage and Bouchard is a vital part of a Stack Five deployment led by a historic great McDavid who tilts offensive zone time in NHL 99 percentile (50.5%).

I like Bouchard a lot and give younger D lots of rope in terms of development time and some wobbles in his game. He hasn't been as consistent this year reflected in PP results and his own challenges getting pucks through (he has significant # of blocks as well as missing the net). The top D pairing has been prone defending at times as well.

Would like to see x- GAR against actual GAR to have a clearer picture of d-man performance.

I don't pay for the patreon, but it's offered here if you'd like to view it.

GAR assumes league average goaltending, which Edmonton hasn't gotten.
 

iCanada

Registered User
Feb 6, 2010
20,455
21,572
Edmonton
Gee.....who's Ekholm's partner?

Screenshot_20241126-132401.png


So how come Bouchard's on ice save percentage goes up without Ekholm, and Ekholm's goes down without Bouchard?
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDoused

ChaoticOrange

Registered User
Jun 29, 2008
51,588
31,463
Edmonton
I can't help but laugh at the last sentence. "Zero evidence! Well other than the bad plays he's been making I guess."

Look above and you'll see how a non-idiot looks at analytics.



He isn't even "bad" defensively, he just has major, preventable brain fart moments at too high of a clip at the moment. It's like his timing and reads are off 5-10% in most parts of his game and it's leading to some bad games and bad moments.

He'll be good for 59 minutes, but wash a lot of it out with the abysmal 1 other minute some of the time.

Right, so you want doctoral theses on advanced mathematics and statistics presented while you sit there and throw out "BOUCHARD SHIT" like a sub-average chimpanzee? Wonderful. I'll get right on that.

Bouchard makes mistakes, absolutely. He also makes dozens of excellent plays every game. This isn't as difficult to understand as you're determined to make it look.
 

CantHaveTkachev

Cap Space > NHL players
Nov 30, 2004
52,376
34,422
St. OILbert, AB
is “the leaf game” all you got? Seems like it.
please read most PGT's this year

heck read this:

and this: (it's nonsense btw)
 

Tobias Kahun

Registered User
Oct 3, 2017
45,138
56,590
is “the leaf game” all you got? Seems like it.
Skinner could shoot 10 pucks into his own net and he’d still blame the defense

Right, so you want doctoral theses on advanced mathematics and statistics presented while you sit there and throw out "BOUCHARD SHIT" like a sub-average chimpanzee? Wonderful. I'll get right on that.

Bouchard makes mistakes, absolutely. He also makes dozens of excellent plays every game. This isn't as difficult to understand as you're determined to make it look.
Some posters are just looking for confirmation bias so they see the few bad plays and point to that while ignoring the dozens of good plays he does
 

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
16,994
18,808
Vancouver

I don't pay for the patreon, but it's offered here if you'd like to view it.

GAR assumes league average goaltending, which Edmonton hasn't gotten.
Thanks for the link. But without only half of the puzzle it's hard to make any declarative statements. On the Oilers deployment is a consideration with McDavid driving NHL elite offensive zone time and limited defensive zone time. Add that in real production terms McDavid and Draisaitl (who all coaches lean into playing together as Break In Case of Emergency situations) have produced 24 goals of the team's 58 goals.

The Oil Stack Five is an elite chance driver and producer historically but with a speed bump this year with the wingers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChasinWaterfalls

ChaoticOrange

Registered User
Jun 29, 2008
51,588
31,463
Edmonton
Thanks for the link. But without only half of the puzzle it's hard to make any declarative statements. On the Oilers deployment is a consideration with McDavid driving NHL elite offensive zone time and limited defensive zone time. Add that in real production terms McDavid and Draisaitl (who all coaches lean into playing together as Break In Case of Emergency situations) have produced 24 goals of the team's 58 goals.

The Oil Stack Five is an elite chance driver and producer historically but with a speed bump this year with the wingers.
Well you could also look at Bouchard’s numbers away from McDavid, which are easy enough to dig up. Theyre elite with the likes of Henrique, Brown, Perry and Janmark too.
 

Spawn

Something in the water
Feb 20, 2006
44,511
17,151
Edmonton
ya, it's only "1 game" :laugh:

that's why many people have been ripping on him all year about his uneven play FFS

thing with with analytics is they don't account for critical errors at key times...Bouchard is prone to them more often than actual Norris trophy winners
that requires you to watch hockey games instead of spreadsheets

How do you actually know this though? Are you watching every game of every team every night?

You think Quinn Hughes and Cale Makar aren’t also making mistakes out there?

It’s what tends to happen when offensive dmen have the puck on their stick a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iCanada

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
16,994
18,808
Vancouver
Well you could also look at Bouchard’s numbers away from McDavid, which are easy enough to dig up. Theyre elite with the likes of Henrique, Brown, Perry and Janmark too.
Are you talking x-stats or actual production or both? What I'd like to see is the x-GAR argument you made with context to actual production results. Wonder if anyone here has the paid subscription content to let us look at the complete picture of your statement.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad