ThePhoenixx
Registered User
- Aug 7, 2005
- 9,578
- 6,296
The LTIR Performance Bonus Pool and the 7.5% Performance Bonus Cushion are not the same thing.
There are two different LTIR pools of relief. When a team is using LTIR and a player with Performance Bonuses is recalled the team must have adequate space in the two LTIR pools for the player Salary & Performance Bonuses. If a team has no or insufficient relief in the LTIR Performance Bonus Pool then any excess comes out of the regular LTIR base salary pool.
When a team is using LTIR and a player with Performance Bonuses is loaned from the NHL to the AHL/minors/etc an amount equal to their Performance Bonuses is credited into the LTIR Performance Bonus Pool, likewise a similar credit for their salary goes into the LTIR salary pool. This is why teams prefer to have players with the largest performance bonuses on the roster when LTIR is invoked, even if those players are later sent to the AHL.
I replied to your post in the business section. Here it is if you are busy. Thanks.
Interesting.
So the LTIR rule takes precedence and the two pools created are not completely separate.
It also follows then that it would be a good idea for Edmonton to sign a 35+ player to league minimum and maximum potential bonuses. Send him down after two days and then leave him there indefinitely due to their cap constraints.
We heard how the league used some divide and conquer techniques to close the deal. There is no doubt that this rule benefits the rank and file while punishing the rookies and 35+ gang.
"Sadly, most details of how the NHL/PA have chosen to implement LTIR are not actually contained in the CBA. How performance bonuses are treated under LTIR being one of many examples."
Every time I peruse it, your statement appears valid for more of the CBA. Plenty of ambiguities.
Thanks for your time.
Last edited: