Kulak on the first pairing... wtf disaster time, and McDavid will not extend.
When you have 2 10m Dmen, who can't work with eachother, you need to have cheap options who compliment them. Kulak can skate, and with someone who can focus more on the offense, he can focus more on D. I think he could be a sneaky good compliment beside Bouchard, exactly like he was in the playoffs before Ekholm came back.
Nurse is still the weak link. Who could we get to try and get the best out of him?
Idk because at that point, you are pretty capped out at D imo. So anyone coming in would need to make as much as Stecher/Emberson. I personally think if Nurse gets better deployment with one of McDrai's lines more often, he has a much better looking year.
Maybe he works with Fabbro, you move Walman up and Kulak takes the bottom pair. But then you have a weaker bottom pair imo, and I prefer the depth approach. I look at the pairs like this
Kulak-Bouchard- mostly McDavid minutes.
Walman-Fabbro- tough matchup line to go out with 3rd/4th lines. This will probably make Walman have a worse looking year, but that will play in our favour come negotiation time, and I think these would be our best 2 defensive D.
Nurse-Stecher/Emberson- Drai line minutes. Nurse's skating can help Leon's line with zone entries (because mcdavid doesn't need that), and Draisaitl being such a good defensive fwd can hopefully help Nurse in his own end. This is mainly to hopefully pump up Nurse's numbers in anticipation of his nmc opening up.
If Emberson/Stecher dont seem cut for it come tdl, then you add a bottom pair rhd. A ways away, but from what I hear of him, Akey sounds like he could be a potential fit with Nurse in a couple years. Hell, maybe Regula is something by then?