I didn't think there was. The Oilers hires exposed that clause, which is why it was promptly voted out as it didn't meet the intent (preventing teams from scooping active coaches). However, since the rule was in place at the time the hires occurred they were enforced. I think it was ultimately the right decision, just stupid that the clause was so poorly written to allow that to happen.
___
Correction, there were a couple others as well, but all in the same year as the clause was only in place a short time. What's weird to me is that I thought Babcock's contract expired, not that he was fired. So I don't know why Detroit would have got compensation.