Proposal: Rumors and Proposals Thread: Chia's Quest For D and WINNING!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Birdperson

Registered User
Mar 26, 2016
577
6
Nurse doesn't do a thing for them in the short term, though. I don't think they'd want to wait until Price is in his 30s before making a run. Losing Klefbom would suck, but I if that's the price, you pay it.

Sekera-Subban
Davidson-UFA (Demers/Hamhuis/Goligoski)
Reinhart-Gryba
Nurse

I thibk the overrating of character/toughness makes Nurse very attractive to them. Besides, I don't think they really have a plan. I've liked Bergevin up until now but keeping Therrien is just an unforgiveable move.
 

s7ark

RIP
Jul 3, 2003
27,579
175
PK I would do the 1st overall for. These insane requests from Habs fans for 1st OA + Hall ++ or McDavid straight up:)biglaugh:) are pretty humourous.
 

Paralyzer008

Registered User
Jan 30, 2008
15,293
5,332
Not dealing Hall for Subban.

More than willing to package any of the following:

RNH
Nurse
Yakupov
Our 1st round pick in both 2016 or 2017.

I think a package works better for us than jettisoning Hall.
 

Birdperson

Registered User
Mar 26, 2016
577
6
Not dealing Hall for Subban.

More than willing to package any of the following:

RNH
Nurse
Yakupov
Our 1st round pick in both 2016 or 2017.

I think a package works better for us than jettisoning Hall.

It'd probably cost even less imo. Probably one of RNH/2016 1st. Quantity packages never have this much quality.
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
Not dealing Hall for Subban.

More than willing to package any of the following:

RNH
Nurse
Yakupov
Our 1st round pick in both 2016 or 2017.

I think a package works better for us than jettisoning Hall.

Not sure how these are equal. 2016 1st is worth insanely more than 2017. If they were close in value, that means Oilers are bottom 3 again, which means Subban did nothing.
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
People need to remember Pronger is likely the best D to be traded in past 10 years. He was unquestionably better than Subban at time of trade, and he went for far less

Pronger was traded for Brewer (young D who was showing good things at the time), Doug Lynch ( a semi promising D prospect who never figured it out. But at time of trade still had some shot at NHL career) and Jeff Woywitka, a 6'3 225 1st round pick who was coming off a solid AHL season and looked to be NHL ready. He would then go on to play nearly 300 pro games

Funny enough, we have 3 clones in our organization right now, almost at the exact same development points

Klefbom- Young NHL D showing good things in NHL
Musil- 2nd round pick who faces uncertain NHL future, not quite written off yet
Reinhart- big 1st round pick in his 2nd AHL season, NHL ready or extremely close.

Imagine the flaming youd get if you proposed Klefbom, Musil, Reinhart

The conviently, Pronger was traded AGAIN a year later, after he had just taken his team to the SCF. This was peak Pronger. Above any D in the league today

The return?

Ladislav Smid- shutdown D prospect drfated in 1st round, near NHL ready
Joffery Lupul- a promising young forward. Former 7th overall who just couldnt figure in out in Anahiem (mostly injury concerns)
1st- 30th overall (essentially our 2nd)
2nd- 53rd overall
cond 1st (if we win the cup)

Again- we actually have very similar pieces

Reinhart- I put Reinhart closer to Smid than I do Woywitka. These 2 were nearly same
Yakupov- Young former #1 overall who just hasnt figured it out in Edmonton
2nd round pick- 31st overall
2017 1st round pick- well say this equals a 53rd overall
cond 1st if we win the cup

Yakupov, Reinhart, 2nd, 2017 1st, cond 1st if we win cup. For the best D in the league and future HOFer
 

McWeber

Mouthbreather
Jul 14, 2015
2,848
788
Lethbridge
People need to remember Pronger is likely the best D to be traded in past 10 years. He was unquestionably better than Subban at time of trade, and he went for far less

Pronger was traded for Brewer (young D who was showing good things at the time), Doug Lynch ( a semi promising D prospect who never figured it out. But at time of trade still had some shot at NHL career) and Jeff Woywitka, a 6'3 225 1st round pick who was coming off a solid AHL season and looked to be NHL ready. He would then go on to play nearly 300 pro games

Funny enough, we have 3 clones in our organization right now, almost at the exact same development points

Klefbom- Young NHL D showing good things in NHL
Musil- 2nd round pick who faces uncertain NHL future, not quite written off yet
Reinhart- big 1st round pick in his 2nd AHL season, NHL ready or extremely close.

Imagine the flaming youd get if you proposed Klefbom, Musil, Reinhart

The conviently, Pronger was traded AGAIN a year later, after he had just taken his team to the SCF. This was peak Pronger. Above any D in the league today

The return?

Ladislav Smid- shutdown D prospect drfated in 1st round, near NHL ready
Joffery Lupul- a promising young forward. Former 7th overall who just couldnt figure in out in Anahiem (mostly injury concerns)
1st- 30th overall (essentially our 2nd)
2nd- 53rd overall
cond 1st (if we win the cup)

Again- we actually have very similar pieces

Reinhart- I put Reinhart closer to Smid than I do Woywitka. These 2 were nearly same
Yakupov- Young former #1 overall who just hasnt figured it out in Edmonton
2nd round pick- 31st overall
2017 1st round pick- well say this equals a 53rd overall
cond 1st if we win the cup

Yakupov, Reinhart, 2nd, 2017 1st, cond 1st if we win cup. For the best D in the league and future HOFer

They are out to lunch, every fan base expects the moon for their best players. It also seems that there is a major Oiler tax on these boards, requiring a massive overpayment in any proposal.
 

MessierII

Registered User
Aug 10, 2011
28,659
18,179
People need to remember Pronger is likely the best D to be traded in past 10 years. He was unquestionably better than Subban at time of trade, and he went for far less

Pronger was traded for Brewer (young D who was showing good things at the time), Doug Lynch ( a semi promising D prospect who never figured it out. But at time of trade still had some shot at NHL career) and Jeff Woywitka, a 6'3 225 1st round pick who was coming off a solid AHL season and looked to be NHL ready. He would then go on to play nearly 300 pro games

Funny enough, we have 3 clones in our organization right now, almost at the exact same development points

Klefbom- Young NHL D showing good things in NHL
Musil- 2nd round pick who faces uncertain NHL future, not quite written off yet
Reinhart- big 1st round pick in his 2nd AHL season, NHL ready or extremely close.

Imagine the flaming youd get if you proposed Klefbom, Musil, Reinhart

The conviently, Pronger was traded AGAIN a year later, after he had just taken his team to the SCF. This was peak Pronger. Above any D in the league today

The return?

Ladislav Smid- shutdown D prospect drfated in 1st round, near NHL ready
Joffery Lupul- a promising young forward. Former 7th overall who just couldnt figure in out in Anahiem (mostly injury concerns)
1st- 30th overall (essentially our 2nd)
2nd- 53rd overall
cond 1st (if we win the cup)

Again- we actually have very similar pieces

Reinhart- I put Reinhart closer to Smid than I do Woywitka. These 2 were nearly same
Yakupov- Young former #1 overall who just hasnt figured it out in Edmonton
2nd round pick- 31st overall
2017 1st round pick- well say this equals a 53rd overall
cond 1st if we win the cup

Yakupov, Reinhart, 2nd, 2017 1st, cond 1st if we win cup. For the best D in the league and future HOFer
Pronger was also a pending UFA when we traded for him.
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
Pronger was also a pending UFA when we traded for him.

Contract was never really a concern (as far as I remember Ducks had no issue resigning him). For example if we traded for Shattenkirk its not like we are getting a huge discount because hes a pending UFA
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
And the same also applies to Hall if we trade him in a quantity for quality deal. Well get hosed beyond believe. Some former 1st round pick with 50 points in AHL than is rated 7.5B on Hockeysfuture, a young roster player who has big question marks but has played semi ok, and a 1st round pick. And of those guys 1 will go on to play over 100 games for us

Most trades for stars are quantity for quality and every time quanity loses big time

I hope we can be a quantity trading team
 

Tarus

Registered User
Jun 22, 2006
9,610
4,911
Edmonton
Pronger was also a pending UFA when we traded for him.

The return edmonton got for Pronger after the playoff run is more relevant to the discussion, where he had 4 years left on his contract.

The return St.Louis got is not something anyone could consider a reasonable comparison given the circumstances(new cap, St.Louis nearly broke and up for sale, former hart winning D allowed to get close to UFA status and put on the market after injury plagued seasons). Brewer(somewhat disappointing D in the middle of his prime), Lynch(badly injured and already busting), and Woychowika(declining asset) was highway robbery
 
Last edited:

ChaoticOrange

Registered User
Jun 29, 2008
51,536
31,377
Edmonton
there is a very small market for Subban. He has an upcoming cap hit of 9 mill so that cuts out 3/4 of the teams. Most of the teams with cap space are not spend to the cap teams or in a rebuild.

Off the top of my head, I can only think of us and Dallas as real players for PK.

I'm not even sure what Dallas would be able to offer in terms of young talent that wouldn't absolutely gut their team.

Maybe something like Nuke, Honka, and picks? I don't know if that even gets Montreal to the table.
 

Paralyzer008

Registered User
Jan 30, 2008
15,293
5,332
Not sure how these are equal. 2016 1st is worth insanely more than 2017. If they were close in value, that means Oilers are bottom 3 again, which means Subban did nothing.

I didn't say they were equal. Just said either pick could be used in a package.
 

ottawa

Avatar of the Year*
Nov 7, 2012
33,835
10,473
Orléans/Toronto
People need to remember Pronger is likely the best D to be traded in past 10 years. He was unquestionably better than Subban at time of trade, and he went for far less

Pronger was traded for Brewer (young D who was showing good things at the time), Doug Lynch ( a semi promising D prospect who never figured it out. But at time of trade still had some shot at NHL career) and Jeff Woywitka, a 6'3 225 1st round pick who was coming off a solid AHL season and looked to be NHL ready. He would then go on to play nearly 300 pro games

Funny enough, we have 3 clones in our organization right now, almost at the exact same development points

Klefbom- Young NHL D showing good things in NHL
Musil- 2nd round pick who faces uncertain NHL future, not quite written off yet
Reinhart- big 1st round pick in his 2nd AHL season, NHL ready or extremely close.

Imagine the flaming youd get if you proposed Klefbom, Musil, Reinhart

The conviently, Pronger was traded AGAIN a year later, after he had just taken his team to the SCF. This was peak Pronger. Above any D in the league today

The return?

Ladislav Smid- shutdown D prospect drfated in 1st round, near NHL ready
Joffery Lupul- a promising young forward. Former 7th overall who just couldnt figure in out in Anahiem (mostly injury concerns)
1st- 30th overall (essentially our 2nd)
2nd- 53rd overall
cond 1st (if we win the cup)

Again- we actually have very similar pieces

Reinhart- I put Reinhart closer to Smid than I do Woywitka. These 2 were nearly same
Yakupov- Young former #1 overall who just hasnt figured it out in Edmonton
2nd round pick- 31st overall
2017 1st round pick- well say this equals a 53rd overall
cond 1st if we win the cup

Yakupov, Reinhart, 2nd, 2017 1st, cond 1st if we win cup. For the best D in the league and future HOFer

This is actually a great post (minus the end), use Pronger's trade as a benchmark since he's the last elite defenseman that was traded.

Lupul (23 year old 7th overall)
Smid (20 year old 9th overall)
1st round pick 2007
2nd round pick 2007
1st round pick 2008 (conditional)

That's the value of a signed franchise defenseman.
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
The return edmonton got for Pronger after the playoff run is more relevant to the discussion, where he had 4 years left on his contract.

The return St.Louis got is not something anyone could consider a reasonable comparison given the circumstances(new cap, St.Louis nearly broke and up for sale, former hart winning D allowed to get close to UFA status and put on the market after injury plagued seasons). Brewer(somewhat disappointing D in the middle of his prime), Lynch(badly injured and already busting), and Woychowika(declining asset) was highway robbery

I think both were highway robbery, both for us an against us. I dont think you can say Brewer was dissappointing when traded. Put up 4 years of 25+ points as a 21-25 year old. but yes it was a steal. #1 D arent traded unless of extreme circumstances. Ie your team is broke, your wife forces you to leave, or your GM is a nut.

When Pronger was traded to Anahiem he had more value as he was coming off a monster playoff performance. Smid was a key cog, id say equal in value to Brewer. The picks were good but they were low, low picks. The only saving grace in that trade is that they won the cup, and that 1st became Eberle. If it wasnt for those two major things, that trade would have been horrible

This is actually a great post (minus the end), use Pronger's trade as a benchmark since he's the last elite defenseman that was traded.

Lupul (23 year old 7th overall)
Smid (20 year old 9th overall)
1st round pick 2007
2nd round pick 2007
1st round pick 2008 (conditional)

That's the value of a signed franchise defenseman.

Lupuls value had severly depreciated, id put his value around Yakupovs right now, maybeYak + 2nd is same. Those picks werent high either, 30th, 53rd, 23 (cond)

But this can be down for Hall too. If you look in the past, guys like him traded for quantity almost always got hosed in the trade. Has there ever been a trade in which the team receiving quantity actually won? It seems like the only time that happens is if team gets EXTREMELY lucky at drafting. Or if they trade a piece received in that trade for another asset, then that asset becomes something

As fans we have to deal with 2 very conflicting things. 1) As fans we want max value for our assets and well propose any deal to get them. Thats being pragmatic 2) The reality that superstar players traded almost never return something close to FV

So I HOPE if Hall or Eberle or RNH is traded they get max fair value. But I know that this is extremely unlikely to happen. Thats why id rather hold on to the higher value ones and trade lower value ones for lesser D. If we are going to lose trades, id rather lose smaller

But hey, Jones was just dealt for Johansen in 1 for 1 swap, maybe these deals happen more often
 

Arpeggio

Registered User
Jul 20, 2006
9,250
3,945
Edmonton
Lupuls value had severly depreciated, id put his value around Yakupovs right now, maybeYak + 2nd is same. Those picks werent high either, 30th, 53rd, 23 (cond)

Lupul had just scored 28 goals and over 50 points in his second full season in the NHL. His value was literally twice that of Yakupov's. People thought he might be a 40 goal scorer.
 

ottawa

Avatar of the Year*
Nov 7, 2012
33,835
10,473
Orléans/Toronto
Lupuls value had severly depreciated, id put his value around Yakupovs right now, maybeYak + 2nd is same. Those picks werent high either, 30th, 53rd, 23 (cond)

But this can be down for Hall too. If you look in the past, guys like him traded for quantity almost always got hosed in the trade. Has there ever been a trade in which the team receiving quantity actually won? It seems like the only time that happens is if team gets EXTREMELY lucky at drafting. Or if they trade a piece received in that trade for another asset, then that asset becomes something

As fans we have to deal with 2 very conflicting things. 1) As fans we want max value for our assets and well propose any deal to get them. Thats being pragmatic 2) The reality that superstar players traded almost never return something close to FV

So I HOPE if Hall or Eberle or RNH is traded they get max fair value. But I know that this is extremely unlikely to happen. Thats why id rather hold on to the higher value ones and trade lower value ones for lesser D. If we are going to lose trades, id rather lose smaller

But hey, Jones was just dealt for Johansen in 1 for 1 swap, maybe these deals happen more often

How's that? :laugh: he was easily the biggest piece coming to the Oilers...55 points as a sophomore is great.

You must not remember that trade very well, let alone remember Lupul's worth
 

Birdperson

Registered User
Mar 26, 2016
577
6
Why did they give up on Lupul so quickly again? Seems really odd looking back.

edit: Ahh, they got Pitkanen. Who they gave up on quickly as well.
 

Tarus

Registered User
Jun 22, 2006
9,610
4,911
Edmonton
I think both were highway robbery, both for us an against us. I dont think you can say Brewer was dissappointing when traded. Put up 4 years of 25+ points as a 21-25 year old. but yes it was a steal. #1 D arent traded unless of extreme circumstances. Ie your team is broke, your wife forces you to leave, or your GM is a nut.

When Pronger was traded to Anahiem he had more value as he was coming off a monster playoff performance. Smid was a key cog, id say equal in value to Brewer. The picks were good but they were low, low picks. The only saving grace in that trade is that they won the cup, and that 1st became Eberle. If it wasnt for those two major things, that trade would have been horrible

Brewer was a bit disappointing at the time. It was readily apparent that he wasn't going to live up to the 40 - 50 point, number one D status that the Oilers had envisioned for him. Decent player, but he was one of those guys who had wonderful skills, but never quite put it together in the way you'd hope. He was actually kind of like Petry in many ways, in that he was a 20 - 25 point second pairing defenseman that is less than the sum of his parts.

The second deal was quite a bit different than the first, and the comparisons between the two separate deals edmonton made don't really hold up. Pronger should have been worth more considering he had dispelled the injury concerns, the playoff no-show concerns, and was locked up long term. Unfortunately, Lowe was already fixated on rebuilding through the draft and gaining assets, rather than creating a bidding war.
 
Last edited:

Tarus

Registered User
Jun 22, 2006
9,610
4,911
Edmonton
Why did they give up on Lupul so quickly again? Seems really odd looking back.

edit: Ahh, they got Pitkanen. Who they gave up on quickly as well.

He completely wilted under the glare of playing in Edmonton, and there were rumors he didn't work well with Mactavish. Of course, no one of the offensive persuasion worked well with Mactavish in Edmonton, so that's not exactly an unusual occurrence. Mactavish also played a major part in running Pitkanen out of town as well, albeit for different reasons.
 

hallhopkinseberle

Registered User
Jul 14, 2007
4,262
186
london
And the same also applies to Hall if we trade him in a quantity for quality deal. Well get hosed beyond believe. Some former 1st round pick with 50 points in AHL than is rated 7.5B on Hockeysfuture, a young roster player who has big question marks but has played semi ok, and a 1st round pick. And of those guys 1 will go on to play over 100 games for us

Most trades for stars are quantity for quality and every time quanity loses big time

I hope we can be a quantity trading team

Not all the time, the Rick Nash Trade I say Columbus Won.
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
How's that? :laugh: he was easily the biggest piece coming to the Oilers...55 points as a sophomore is great.

You must not remember that trade very well, let alone remember Lupul's worth

I remember not being exactly pumped about Lupul, but thats a matter of opinion
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad