Faelko
Registered User
- Aug 11, 2002
- 11,997
- 5,261
Eberle for someone. I just feel it.
Yeah, something like that...
Eberle for someone. I just feel it.
He's far too unproven for me to have much interest. Plus he had a pretty mediocre season. If he didn't post godly numbers last season would anyone even know his name this year?
Scrivens posted godly numbers on that LA team last year too...
That will be embarrassing...Ebs is going to be at the draft party at rexall tonight...
Except...Chia was straight up saying he wasn't willing to overpayWow so Anderson wont be traded and Buffalo is out of the Talbot mix = We're gonna overpay for Talbot :S
I'm not saying weber isn't great I'm saying a team with a cluster that is 20 years of age shouldn't put most of its assets in a defensman that is 10 years older then the heart of the cluster.
Except...Chia was straight up saying he wasn't willing to overpay
Joe McDonald @ESPNJoeyMac · 6m6 minutes ago
There's a chance Rangers deal Cam Talbot before draft begins. Calgary a strong possibility. Flames better chance than Edmonton at this point
Considering what their genius GM gave Engelland last year, I'm optimistic that the price will be stupid.
Yes, my counter would be he would make SUCH a difference as player, it might push things along more quickly offsetting the age difference.
His contract gets better vs. the increase in the cap as time goes by.
Also, he would do wonders for all the young defensemen on the way. Oh what Nurse could learn from Weber.
Will the Flames give up #18? If they do, good on them.
Yeah, something like that...
I totally understand the concern, but how much more has Talbot proven? I don't think his sample size is much better. He posted very good numbers on a very good NYR team, boasting a very good defence core.
It would just suck to trade #33 and #57 for him, only to lose him to free agency after one season. You don't have that concern with Jones because of his age and contract situation.
Will the Flames give up #18? If they do, good on them.
Why give it up when they can use it to draft another Jankowski?
Can anyone explain to me why we are even interested in Talbot?
Unproven goalie, small sample size, behind one of leagues best defence.
This just sounds like way to much potential for disaster.
Can anyone explain to me why we are even interested in Talbot?
Unproven goalie, small sample size, behind one of leagues best defence.
This just sounds like way to much potential for disaster.
Best player in the draft.
Can anyone explain to me why we are even interested in Talbot?
Unproven goalie, small sample size, behind one of leagues best defence.
This just sounds like way to much potential for disaster.
Anyone have a chance to compare Scrivens numbers in LA vs Talbots in NY? I would imagine they are very similar.