FLYguy3911
Sanheim Lover
- Oct 19, 2006
- 54,574
- 89,700
19th.2nd round pick is what pick ?
End of round 2 ?
19th.2nd round pick is what pick ?
End of round 2 ?
2nd round pick is what pick ?
End of round 2 ?
I‘d say this aged poorly, but it was a terrible take the moment you posted it.Only Flyer fans could whine about taking a fast, stout center who is scoring a PPG in his return to the college game because they passed on a good, but not great LHD.
Now if Miller was a 6'2 220 lb RHD with a similar skill package . . .
I still remember how everone was yelling and hoping for Miller, Merkley or even Veleno and Hextall just punched us all in the face.
Hextall wasn’t trying to take a big swing. That’s not how the dude operates. Proper evaluations of players should never result in first round picks not being signed. That’s why it never happens.This is what it looks like when you do take a big swing and it doesn't work out. If we want them to do that, and most of us do, we have to understand that this is going to be the outcome sometimes. They navigated it well by not taking the easy road and signing him.
Do it again with the pick it created. Smart risks are good.
Hextall wasn’t trying to take a big swing. That’s not how the dude operates. Proper evaluations of players should never result in first round picks not being signed. That’s why it never happens.
Hextall was risk-adverse in pretty much everything, that’s why I say that. What he was betting on was having what many people, around the league, proclaimed as a deep prospect pool and focused on taking a slew of college players because they held their rights longer should they have chosen to do that because they expect to not have enough pro spots for everyone. It carried over when it was insinuated that Nick Luukko was running the drafts because college players was his focus, and it’s what happened in Fletcher’s first draft.If you don’t think taking a guy with a handful of US games above New England High School hockey in the top 20 of a draft is a big swing, we just don’t look at things the same way. Frankly, we almost never agree because we don’t approach much of anything the same way. That’s ok. It is what it is.
Hextall was risk-adverse in pretty much everything, that’s why I say that. What he was betting on was having what many people, around the league, proclaimed as a deep prospect pool and focused on taking a slew of college players because they held their rights longer should they have chosen to do that because they expect to not have enough pro spots for everyone. It carried over when it was insinuated that Nick Luukko was running the drafts because college players was his focus, and it’s what happened in Fletcher’s first draft.
I believe it was their strategy. Hextall was betting on his prospects - all of them, and always was. With the amount of draft picks we had at the time, they needed the signing windows spread out because he was never planning to trade any of them. Organizationally, they were so deep with forwards and basically stopped drafting defensemen.Do we know that they were focused on this lack of spots or is it how you’re reading the info that we have? That’s a question, not a statement. Exactly what they said and when is definitely something you would remember more than I would.
Sidenote, but for the sake of clarity, I’m assuming you mean Nick Pryor. If that’s wrong, please correct me. I don’t care about the typo. I just want to make sure I understand what you’re saying. There’s so damn much nepotism to remember with this team.
Is Hextall still going to be a GM this summer?Hextall is going to sign him. Just you watch
Not entirely fair to JOB. He did get a bad concussion in his first freshman year, then left the school to go back to JrA in BC. Never panned out but that happens. The scouts thought they had a diamond in the rough, but he turned out to be a piece of coal. They should have taken Mattias Samuelsson, then they wouldn't have needed Ginning.Weak draft, questionable pick, flatlined development - for once not primarily due to injuries but only on the player himself.
I still remember how everone was yelling and hoping for Miller, Merkley or even Veleno and Hextall just punched us all in the face.
Question is when you take that swing, #19 or trade down and do so at say #29?If you don’t think taking a guy with a handful of US games above New England High School hockey in the top 20 of a draft is a big swing, we just don’t look at things the same way. Frankly, we almost never agree because we don’t approach much of anything the same way. That’s ok. It is what it is.
Question is when you take that swing, #19 or trade down and do so at say #29?