Well then you're not reading my posts cause it's pretty straight forward. Since the draft what I've seen posters on these boards, and what I've seen in general was that it was okay for the Flyers to pass on Buium because 11 other teams did. Why would teams passed on someone that was rated so high there must be something wrong with Buium. I'm saying the fact that he was passed has more to do with the poor decision making NHL Gms do, rather than a reflection of how good a player he is. The Flyers own gm admitted they passed because of reasons that have no reflection of Buium the player
Now to support this argument, I listed some other players that if their draft year were to be redrafted, those players would be picked higher. Obvious hindsight, but it wasn't like they were bad players during their draft years. I looked it up and of forwards drafted in the 1st in 06, only Derrick Brassard and Bryan Little scored more than Giroux as CHL players (Chris f***ing Stewart was drafted before Giroux). You said Giroux was rated in the 40s and the Flyers reached well hmmm wouldn't that have made the ratings wrong and therefore the teams that didn't pick Girous were wrong as well? So the argument that teams passing on a player should not be used when evaluating how good that player is. If I remember correctly I think the Flyers drafted Giroux only cause Simon Nolet had to practically beg them to(did this with Gagne as well)