Toggle sidebar

Draft Round 1 #23: New York Rangers Select RW Gabriel Perreault (Boston College, NCAA)

Larrybiv said:
Hey guys, I'd be the 1st to admit that I don't follow our prospects like you guys do. Wasn't a college guy myself (actually 1 year) don't really know the levels and choices these kids have, etc. Anyway, sorry for interrupting here.
My question. Perreault is a RW, right? Rangers need that, right?
How long do you think it'll take for him to get there? I mean, he doesn't "have to" finish College, right? Hey, education is most important, but.....if he's only there for the purpose of hockey......
So, again.....? Thanks, LarryBiv
Click to expand...
Many will disagree with me, but I don't think the kid is physically ready for pro hockey. The skill level is there. He'd instantly be one of the more skilled players on our roster. But he still has a kid's frame. BC's page has him listed at 5'11" and 165 lbs.

I think he's spent most of his time at RW, but it's really not an issue to switch sides, if needed.

I'm sure the Rangers will put on the full court press to sign him, but I'd like to see him go back to college for another year. The college schedule is lighter than an AHL schedule, which allows more time in the weight room physically developing. He'll also be in line for a more critical role if Leonard and Smith move on, and I'd like to see how he handles the change and uses it to grow as a player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larrybiv, JCProdigy, GENESISPuck94 and 1 other person
An offseason can do wonders for a kid that age. He'd be able to handle Hartford next year if that's where they wanted to start him and he decides he wants to go pro. I think he'd probably benefit from a whole year there like Othmann but still he could do it.

Side note, my best friend played football at BC. Awesome school, facilities are amazing. Great place for a kid that age to spend time especially being great at sports.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wieters and kovazub94
GAGLine said:
Yes, he's a RW, though he can play either wing.

The general consensus is that he'll play 1 more year at BC, then go pro, but that could change depending on what Smith and Leonard do. Gauthier is expected to leave. If Smith and Leonard leave, that could change Gabe's decision. BC has some good players coming in, notably James Hagens, who could be the 1st overall pick in 2025, so that could factor into his decision as well.

Also, how they do in the NCAA tournament this year could impact all of their decisions. If they don't win it this year, all of Smith, Leonard and Perreault might decide to stay another year and try to win a championship. If they do win, maybe none of them go back.

I expect that if he returns to BC next year, that will be it for him, and he'll sign with the Rangers immediately following the season.
Click to expand...
I also think that how they fare in the National tournament will be the most determining factor for all three decisions to stay or to go. Sharks need to put fannies in the seats, Caps are rebuilding on the fly and need talent influx to support Ovechkin’s quest (and they seem to be doing it pretty well under the circumstances) and the Rangers always want their prospects in the fold sooner.
 
id like GP to go back to college after winning the natty this year. have BC get eliminated early next year and we sign him to a pro contract with enough time for him to play in hartford.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Crypto Guy
I think Gauthier and Smith are gone pretty much no matter what happens.

Leonard probably closer to 50/50.

I hope GP goes back. I think spending a season with different linemates at the NCAA level, plus another year of physical development, would be good for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JCProdigy and RagFinMet
kovazub94 said:
I also think that how they fare in the National tournament will be the most determining factor for all three decisions to stay or to go. Sharks need to put fannies in the seats, Caps are rebuilding on the fly and need talent influx to support Ovechkin’s quest (and they seem to be doing it pretty well under the circumstances) and the Rangers always want their prospects in the fold sooner.
Click to expand...
Im fairly certain even if they win, perreault will stay.
I don’t see him wanting to spend too much time in the ahl, and his body at the moment wouldn’t be ready for the playoffs, so there’s no extra incentive to join, and it’s not like his family is hurting for money.
 
The NHL while still somewhat physical, is no longer that league that should scare off smaller players.

I'd have no issue with Gabe suiting up next year if that was what he chose to do.
 
HatTrick Swayze said:
I think Gauthier and Smith are gone pretty much no matter what happens.

Leonard probably closer to 50/50.

I hope GP goes back. I think spending a season with different linemates at the NCAA level, plus another year of physical development, would be good for him.
Click to expand...

I think Smith leaving would be a massive mistake on his end and San Jose's.

I wouldn't fault him for wanting to get that UFA clock ticking ASAP (and he'd have leverage to burn a ELC year this season by getting into a game or 5) but he is not going to be afforded all of the space he's getting at that level in the NHL, especially with San Jose.


Gauthier is 100000% gone and will be a Duck next year. Leonard should probably go too.
 
Beer League Sniper said:
Many will disagree with me, but I don't think the kid is physically ready for pro hockey. The skill level is there. He'd instantly be one of the more skilled players on our roster. But he still has a kid's frame. BC's page has him listed at 5'11" and 165 lbs.

I think he's spent most of his time at RW, but it's really not an issue to switch sides, if needed.

I'm sure the Rangers will put on the full court press to sign him, but I'd like to see him go back to college for another year. The college schedule is lighter than an AHL schedule, which allows more time in the weight room physically developing. He'll also be in line for a more critical role if Leonard and Smith move on, and I'd like to see how he handles the change and uses it to grow as a player.
Click to expand...
I’m not sure anyone disagrees with you. This is the consensus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HatTrick Swayze
GoAwayPanarin said:
I think Smith leaving would be a massive mistake on his end and San Jose's.

I wouldn't fault him for wanting to get that UFA clock ticking ASAP (and he'd have leverage to burn a ELC year this season by getting into a game or 5) but he is not going to be afforded all of the space he's getting at that level in the NHL, especially with San Jose.


Gauthier is 100000% gone and will be a Duck next year. Leonard should probably go too.
Click to expand...

I don't really disagree with you.

But the Sharks are gonna want some excitement for the fanbase after this season and the Hertl deal. 4th OA pick. On paper proved about all he could at the NCAA level (agree w you there are things to work on). I just don't see him coming back for another year.
 
the smith thing isn't gonna happen, but othmann+draft capital for a young C with upside is absolutely something we should do.

I know drafting for need is bogus, but we really need to find the C of the future if Chytil isn't gonna be able to contribute.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mas0764
noncents said:
the smith thing isn't gonna happen, but othmann+draft capital for a young C with upside is absolutely something we should do.

I know drafting for need is bogus, but we really need to find the C of the future if Chytil isn't gonna be able to contribute.
Click to expand...
sure but Trocheck and Mika right now aren’t hampering us a ton at the top, and both have years, so we can slow play it.
grabbing smith would be tough because they’d be on the wing, or they’d be 3rd line and we don’t need to repeat the rangers can’t develop forwards narrative.
 
IDvsEGO said:
sure but Trocheck and Mika right now aren’t hampering us a ton at the top, and both have years, so we can slow play it.
grabbing smith would be tough because they’d be on the wing, or they’d be 3rd line and we don’t need to repeat the rangers can’t develop forwards narrative.
Click to expand...
grabbing smith is tough because he's their top prospect, arguably a top 5 prospect in the sport, and sharks are drooling over smith/eklund/musty/edstrom along with celebrini or one of the big D in this draft.

you're just not getting him.
 
For me with Perreault if he's turning pro to play in Hartford we're taking him out of college too early. His hockey IQ is just too advanced to be wasting his time in the AHL. He'd be better off in BC---getting the college experience for his own good rather than riding busses. I also think when he signs he's going straight to the big team and within a year or so I'd expect him to be a top 6 player. His closest comparables of the current Rangers are Fox and Panarin and it's because of his head and his hands. He's just too smart for the minor leagues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beer League Sniper, GENESISPuck94, Wieters and 2 others
noncents said:
grabbing smith is tough because he's their top prospect, arguably a top 5 prospect in the sport, and sharks are drooling over smith/eklund/musty/edstrom along with celebrini or one of the big D in this draft.

you're just not getting him.
Click to expand...
Sure, I was making a bigger point outside of smith, he doesn’t fit our timelines.
A low first rd center who is a bit more slow to develop is the better plan.
 
Larrybiv said:
Hey guys, I'd be the 1st to admit that I don't follow our prospects like you guys do. Wasn't a college guy myself (actually 1 year) don't really know the levels and choices these kids have, etc. Anyway, sorry for interrupting here.
My question. Perreault is a RW, right? Rangers need that, right?
How long do you think it'll take for him to get there? I mean, he doesn't "have to" finish College, right? Hey, education is most important, but.....if he's only there for the purpose of hockey......
So, again.....? Thanks, LarryBiv
Click to expand...
One way or the other, He will be in NY by next years playoffs.
 
noncents said:
mn wants to move rossi for D? sign me up. zac jones+
Click to expand...
1. Jones isn’t quite that valuable so you’re looking Othmann + Jones minimum, and I can’t see them moving rossi since they need cheap talent and he’s not that expensive.
 
IDvsEGO said:
1. Jones isn’t quite that valuable so you’re looking Othmann + Jones minimum, and I can’t see them moving rossi since they need cheap talent and he’s not that expensive.
Click to expand...
Jones is probably more valuable than you think (cheap for another year too) but Rangers would have to add. Maybe grounds for a further discussion here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uglybstrd and mas0764
bobbop said:
Jones is probably more valuable than you think (cheap for another year too) but Rangers would have to add. Maybe grounds for a further discussion here.
Click to expand...
Maybe but I wouldn’t want to target a 5’9” center.
 
noncents said:
the smith thing isn't gonna happen, but othmann+draft capital for a young C with upside is absolutely something we should do.

I know drafting for need is bogus, but we really need to find the C of the future if Chytil isn't gonna be able to contribute.
Click to expand...
Even if Chytil is coming back, we need a young center.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noncents
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom