Cherneski
Cherneski looked like a real NHL player.
Brendl never did.
Cherneski
I know nothing about evaluating skating and technique but from what I've seen of Perreault, the important thing is that he gets to places on the ice as needed, has been able to pull away from defenders when needed, and it doesn't currently look like something that will hold him back. Even his explosiveness seems to have gotten a bit better as the year has gone on.most people have no idea how to evaluate skating, they usually just regurgitate whatever the narrative is around a player. most of the public scouting community has insufficient parameters to provide a thorough evaluation of skating ability. they basically look at a skating stride and unless a player who has an unorthodox one is an absolute dynamo that flies around the ice, they get tagged as a poor skater. gabe literally has zero skating concerns...his top end pace is certainly sufficient and he can escape pressure in small areas without issue. he knows when to accelerate into space and more importantly, he has phenomenal body control and balance. evaluating skating really is much more nuanced than a metric you can quantify or it's aesthetic appeal. it's really about the comprehensive picture understanding how a player plays, evaluating how their pace and mobility complements it, whether or not those things project in the pro game, and finally looking for technical issues that are insufficient at the next level and whether or not those things are fundamental or developmental in nature. gabe has zero technical deficiencies in his skating ability. there are areas he can and will improve in with physical development and like every player, there are little things he'll clean up over time to make incremental marginal improvements. the idea that his skating might be a prohibitive factor in his ability to translate at the nhl level though is simply a lazy, uninformed, or inept assessment. the only prohibitive quality about his game overall separating him from playing in the nhl is physical development.
His skating isn't even slightly an issue. Its just fans of other teams trying to run him down, just like some of us do with other prospects like Cutter and Smith. hahaha.I know nothing about evaluating skating and technique but from what I've seen of Perreault, the important thing is that he gets to places on the ice as needed, has been able to pull away from defenders when needed, and it doesn't currently look like something that will hold him back. Even his explosiveness seems to have gotten a bit better as the year has gone on.
How that will translate to the NHL remains to be seen...he'll certainly have a harder time getting separation but that goes for everyone making the jump to the NHL, and I think he still has room to improve and isn't a finished product.
I see people on the main boards talking about how he has "cement feet" and I dunno if they're just parroting stuff or letting the original scouting reports inform their opinion or really do think their analysis stands up. Hell, maybe he does have cement feet, I dunno, like I said I'm not a great skating analysis person. But he gets to where he needs to be and is elusive enough to do what he needs to do.
That's why remembering Cherneski makes me sad and remembering Brendl makes me ill.Cherneski looked like a real NHL player.
Brendl never did.
Not even an honorable mention. What a farce
Top 10 NHL prospects to watch at the NCAA men’s hockey tournament
From Will Smith to Lane Hutson, the NCAA regionals are stacked with quality NHL prospects.www.dailyfaceoff.com
Is it possible he's the passenger, not the driver on that line? Who watched him play for BC?
Usually college passengers don't do well in the WJC, but he did, so there's that.
Many of us have been watching, he is absolutely not a passenger.Is it possible he's the passenger, not the driver on that line? Who watched him play for BC?
Usually college passengers don't do well in the WJC, but he did, so there's that.
I dont agree with this at all. I dont think any of them really are the driving force of offense for that line since they are all so good, but just because Leonard is the most physical doesn’t mean he is driving that offense.Leonard is really the primary driver.
He got hurt and that kind of slowed the hype train.
Smith has really been the passenger on that line even through his most recent hot streak.
He does mention Perreault and Leonard in his Smith writeupNot even an honorable mention. What a farce
Top 10 NHL prospects to watch at the NCAA men’s hockey tournament
From Will Smith to Lane Hutson, the NCAA regionals are stacked with quality NHL prospects.www.dailyfaceoff.com
I didn’t want to put all three of BC’s incredible scoring line here, so just imagine Ryan Leonard (Washington Capitals) and Gabriel Perreault (New York Rangers) being here too.
While Gabe Perreault and Ryan Leonard have been outstanding at BC. Smith’s been the brains of the top line in college hockey – just like he was for two years at the USA Hockey National Team Development Program.
Will this be a one-and-done for Smith? That’s the question a bunch of people are wondering. As for the other two, they’re just as important to Boston’s success at this tournament and should factor into the team’s success.
Don’t forget about the poor Siberian express…..
Absolute shame that was….. kid was Uber talented
was Cherapanov intended here?Cherneski
Is it possible he's the passenger, not the driver on that line? Who watched him play for BC?
Usually college passengers don't do well in the WJC, but he did, so there's that.
Doubtful - Cherneski broke his right knee cap. Never recovered, tried to for like 3 years.was Cherapanov intended here?
Cherneski looked like a real NHL player.
Brendl never did.
Doubtful - Cherneski broke both his knee caps?
Stefan Cherneski Hockey Stats and Profile at hockeydb.com
Statistics of Stefan Cherneski, a hockey player from Winnipeg, MAN born Sep 19 1978 who was active from 1995 to 2001.www.hockeydb.com
Nope... Cherneski was another first round pick from the late 90's that really looked like he would be a player.was Cherapanov intended here?
remember both Cherneski and Cherepanov clearly,Nope... Cherneski was another first round pick from the late 90's that really looked like he would be a player.
Destroyed his knee and that was that... another Rangers first rounder who never played in the NHL.
Undoubtedly, the line was better with Perrault and worse without him. But at the same time, it's worth noting that BC had already wrapped up pretty much everything by the time they sat Perrault, so they were sort of just going through the motions during those games.When he was out for 5 games their #1 PP went 2 for 18, when he came back they went like 6 for 12 or something. He is the smarts on the line. Leonard is the physical player that gives them some more room, and smith is probably the most rounded out player on the line.
I think everyone wants to see how they play with other players (I'm sure they'd still be playing with skilled players, but getting away from the comfort zone of those same linemates would interesting to see how they do)Undoubtedly, the line was better with Perrault and worse without him. But at the same time, it's worth noting that BC had already wrapped up pretty much everything by the time they sat Perrault, so they were sort of just going through the motions during those games.
I agree with HatTrick that this is not the sort of line where you assign passenger/driver roles. None of them are being carried by the others.
Yes. Cherepanovwas Cherapanov intended here?
That's understandable. Although I do think it might have to wait. I doubt any of these guys have any reason to leave BC to go to the AHL, so I suspect it comes down to the immediate opportunity being offered to them at the NHL level.I think everyone wants to see how they play with other players (I'm sure they'd still be playing with skilled players, but getting away from the comfort zone of those same linemates would interesting to see how they do)
Yes, he's a RW, though he can play either wing.Hey guys, I'd be the 1st to admit that I don't follow our prospects like you guys do. Wasn't a college guy myself (actually 1 year) don't really know the levels and choices these kids have, etc. Anyway, sorry for interrupting here.
My question. Perreault is a RW, right? Rangers need that, right?
How long do you think it'll take for him to get there? I mean, he doesn't "have to" finish College, right? Hey, education is most important, but.....if he's only there for the purpose of hockey......
So, again.....? Thanks, LarryBiv