What a concept.So the Rangers just got a decent return for some milquetoast expiring UFAs?
and we just scored a goal putting us a step away from sellingSo the Rangers just got a decent return for some milquetoast expiring UFAs?
At least we have the Marc Gatcomb appreciation threadand we just scored a goal putting us a step away from selling
Gatcomb moer liek GatBOOM amirite my guyAt least we have the Marc Gatcomb appreciation thread![]()
Can’t Believe they got basically a 2nd for Lindgren. They probably flip de Haan tolSo the Rangers just got a decent return for some milquetoast expiring UFAs?
Lou standing pat.and we just scored a goal putting us a step away from selling
He really is a hockey terroristCan’t Believe they got basically a 2nd for Lindgren. They probably flip de Haan tol
Lou standing pat.
“We like our team. Veteran core that has chemistry together”
I know there are still 6 days until the trade deadline but it looks like teams are moving on.An except from an article on the Brock Nelson situation.
"It sure sounds like 31 other teams are looking at the Islanders and wondering why they’re not just selling. In case you haven’t noticed, since the Vancouver Canucks made their pair of big trades before 4 Nations, there’s been zero NHL-level trades."
Lou is the only G.M. who still wants to add to this team it seems![]()
Market is heating up, that type of return should get us pumped for what’s there for 29, 21, and maybe even 44Preds trade Nyquist to MIN got 2026 2nd.
Palms can definitely get that and more.
I’d even say a late 1st
If anyone is confused here, it's you. If you cannot put together that if someone does A and then as a result of doing A they derive short term limited success and in doing so use that "success" as the basis for subsequent poor decisions, then A was not a real success. It was, in fact, the genesis of future failure. But you want to say, "Good job Lou for doing A, I applaud you." when A was the actual f**k up. That is your confusion. It wasn't a good job, it was idiotic to think that that that team that took advantage of wildly unprecedented circumstances was the one reinforce and build upon. It clearly wasn't. But you want to have it both ways now and you can't. Well, you can, in your mind, and in the minds of all of the other hypocrites who loved Lou then but want him gone now. You all saw exactly what you wanted to see and your collective misjudgement and misread was as poor as his.That's how you fairly evaluate someone, you adjust your opinion to the adjustments they are or aren't making. He was doing a good job, then he wasn't. I'm confused as to where your confusion is with this.
The problem is you do not get anything because Lou is not going to move them.I think Nelson gets a 1st, 3rd and another piece. Palmieri might get a first too, he should get a 2nd plus. Getting a third with him would be huge IMO to add some high mid round picks given the lack of depth in our prospect pool.
I think he does.The problem is you do not get anything because Lou is not going to move them.
i hope he does.....not trading Nelson and Palms will be about as bad as PJ Boy's stunt in my book.I think he does.
I think Palmieri goes for sure. The whole Nelson angle is down the middle for next year. If he goes and Pageau that's a lot to fill with no internal replacements.i hope he does.....not trading Nelson and Palms will be about as bad as PJ Boy's stunt in my book.
If anyone is confused here, it's you. If you cannot put together that if someone does A and then as a result of doing A they derive short term limited success and in doing so use that "success" as the basis for subsequent poor decisions, then A was not a real success. It was, in fact, the genesis of future failure. But you want to say, "Good job Lou for doing A, I applaud you." when A was the actual f**k up. That is your confusion. It wasn't a good job, it was idiotic to think that that that team that took advantage of wildly unprecedented circumstances was the one reinforce and build upon. It clearly wasn't. But you want to have it both ways now and you can't. Well, you can, in your mind, and in the minds of all of the other hypocrites who loved Lou then but want him gone now. You all saw exactly what you wanted to see and your collective misjudgement and misread was as poor as his.
I have no problem keeping Pags as third line center....yes, get a center. For the short term you would have Bo, Barzy and PagsI think Palmieri goes for sure. The whole Nelson angle is down the middle for next year. If he goes and Pageau that's a lot to fill with no internal replacements.
I'd like to see an aggressive trade for a 24-28 year old center personally after. Use the assets in the Nelson deal for one. There is no one in free agency.
I don't think it makes sense for them but Middlestat for Nelson?What possible deals are out there that can move out our UFA’s and bring back a younger player and still allow us to contend down the stretch ?
I think JG goes in the offseason but if I were a playoff team I'd go hard for him this deadline. 60% on the draw, playoff guy.I have no problem keeping Pags as third line center....yes, get a center. For the short term you would have Bo, Barzy and Pags
The problem is you do not get anything because Lou is not going to move them.
I think he does.
Can’t Believe they got basically a 2nd for Lindgren. They probably flip de Haan tol
Lou standing pat.
“We like our team.
Yes , they all have dinner together at 3pm and lights out by 7Veteran core that has chemistry together”
Colorado signed Middlestat long term with complete Ntc! So it’s a NoI don't think it makes sense for them but Middlestat for Nelson?
If there is a Perunovich out there in a side deal that'd be ok.
I think JG goes in the offseason but if I were a playoff team I'd go hard for him this deadline. 60% on the draw, playoff guy.
My dream is the scenario I said before about Dobber in a deal for MacTavish and overpaying for Bennett in free agency. Get some talented wings, Horvat-Bennett-Mac-Mac down the middle is a bunch of dogs. Just need skill on the sides.