When did we have two Cup runs? Cup runs are when you run to the Cup. We never did that and to the degree that we came somewhat close, they were wind-aided. So yes, I agree, we don't need to say nice things about them. And we especially don't need to say nice things about them because they sewed the seeds for where we are now. I keep referring to it and I hope he doesn't mind, but @MJF has summed up so perfectly the situation with a line that should, in my opinion, be memorialized somewhere, somehow because of its perfection. "Lou has been trying to win the 2021 Stanley Cup for four years". That's the whole thing in a nutshell. He saw a flawed team go further than it had any right to under highly unusual circumstances and misread what he was seeing. He took it to mean that we were great and just a step away, well worthy of selling the future to double and triple down on what was actually mediocre. When the fans do that, it is perfectly natural. Their not the supposed experts, they just want to win and see their team go far. But when the GM does it, gambles away the milk money on an illusion, that's unforgivable.The succession plan is to fire him immediately and then hire anyone without his last name as an interim or permanent GM.
I don’t think it’s necessary to say nice things about our 2 Cup runs while he was GM. My retort would be to say “What have you done for me lately?” Nada.
One last note. I blame the owners more than Lou. They have accommodated Lou and been far too hands off in their oversight. Clearly this is not in their skill set, but that’s also not a great excuse.
Kakko stinks and Seattle is hoping he lives up to his potential and didn’t trade anything for him. Nelson and Kakko are not comparable.Once again, the Isles waited too long. Now Kappo from the Rangers is the hot talks about him going to the Wild. Trade value of Nelson is going down, day by day. You'll see......
Lou once again is going to screw the isles. Nelson is invisible for most of this year. He's probably headed for his worst season (projected 25-25-50) in a while.
Lou resigns him for 6M for another 4 years....book it.
Why would you put one of our best players right now on the 4th line?!?!When everyone is healthy, I would like to see the following...
Tsyplakov-Horvat-Pageau
Lee-Nelson-Palmieri
MacLean-Barzal-Duclair
Engvall-Cizikas-Holmstrom
Pelech-Pulock
Romanov-Dobson
Cholowski/George-Mayfield
Glad to see him going to Seattle but you can't ignore the age difference and that's what I'm worried about. A young talent who like Kakko who to me didn't really get a fair shake in NY might be more appealing to the Wild or Dallas if they have to give up picks and young prospects.Kakko stinks and Seattle is hoping he lives up to his potential and didn’t trade anything for him. Nelson and Kakko are not comparable.
Lets see him play on a regular basis and regular line in Seattle before I agree with this statementKakko is way more of a bust than Wahlstrom. Or any recent Islanders 1st.
I agree with Dobson, no way I'm I paying him 8-9M and if that's what he's demanding, then yes we need to move him. But I hope he and his agent realize with this season and how bad he's playing he can expect around 6-7M for his next deal with us.That’s fair. I was trying to find an acceptable path forward where the Isles don’t want to pay Dobson $8/9M and can leverage him for another player and still keep Barzal.
Dobson’s contract is a real wild card for this team. If he turns into a Nurse/Jones clone, the Isles are in a rough spot.
To change this team, a major contracted forward needs to go, same with a defenseman. Adjusting the fringe ain’t gonna move the needle much.
I would just use Barzal for a player swap to end the ongoing misery of believing he’s anything more than a Alexei Kovalev - and you don’t build a competitive team around such a player.
Lmao
This seems like a GM exerting his authority, and not a move to make them better though. Ranger fans all seem to be taking KK side saying he isn't the problem and they seem really sour on Drury. From reactions, more than 70% hate it it seems.I agree with Dobson, no way I'm I paying him 8-9M and if that's what he's demanding, then yes we need to move him. But I hope he and his agent realize with this season and how bad he's playing he can expect around 6-7M for his next deal with us.
Listen if there was a deal that would definitely help us long term by moving Brazal, I think we have no choice but to listen. I'm just not sure what tha possible deal looks like.
I understand moving all the dead wood won't move needle much. But it's neccesary that we move out their salaries and roster spots. And if Lou or Management is smart, we can still get good value in Nelson and Parms....But that clock is ticking FAST.
One thing we have to give credit to the Rangers (hate to say it), but they are very willing to trade anyone regardless of popularity and willing to cut ties to players at a drop of a time if they think it will make them better. Not like Lou, he thinks these guys are is kids, his blood and would die first before trading them.
Yeah I think Zeke would be a good veteran influence during a rebuild.I’d start a tear down now. This current lineup is too good to actually hit that top-4 marker (wont go with top-5, never seemed to work). I like what Grier is doing, I’d model off of him (to an extent).
I’d keep certain players (calculated), given their age and developmental curve; eg Holmstrom. There are a few players I’m on the fence about, eg Romanov/Dobson (both still raw). Barzal is tricky, as I do not see more development in his future (at least in an NYI context). In the right situation, as a secondary (or tertiary) piece, he could thrive.
Sorokin is a tough one; the only NYI I’d have a *real tough time parting ways with. He’s truly elite (with minor flaws). Interestingly enough, he was drafted by said NYI. Drafting is the way, though not completely.
Guys like Mac, Fasching are filler; so let them do their role; they fit a rebuild perfectly.
I’d keep Cizikas. He ALWAYS hugs the winning goalie. It speaks to me. It’s not a facade; he doesn’t cost much. He’s cheap, and a model of moving your ass at 100% (perhaps now, 85).
Most of those vets; they gotta go. Sprinkle a few in for youth stabilization.
Yeah I think Zeke would be a good veteran influence during a rebuild.
Sucks we are having these same conversations :/
I remember when we drafted the guy...
Drury is at the point where his moves need to show some results, otherwise, after he departs the Rangers his career as a GM is over.This seems like a GM exerting his authority, and not a move to make them better though. Ranger fans all seem to be taking KK side saying he isn't the problem and they seem really sour on Drury. From reactions, more than 70% hate it it seems.
I guess it depends on how you define a retool. In my mind a retool involves moving every player over the age of 30 this season and next for draft picks. I would also explore moving Barzal for an established player of similar salary. There would likely need to be a buyout of at least one player. But I think if that were to happen the team could get younger and faster and back on track in relatively short order.It's pretty simple as far as I'm concerned, the people here who advocate for some kind of quick fix retool will always be content with the Islanders just being a playoff team. The people here who understand that a rebuild is necessary, and all of the time and pain and uncertainty that goes with it, will only be satisfied when the Islanders become a great team.
I guess it is "simple" if you characterize it that way. But it's more complicated than that IMO, and there are more than those two options (tinkering with a couple of roster spots versus a tear-down rebuild). I think the way to go in the modern NHL with a salary cap and players potentially becoming UFAs in their 20s is to constantly retool to maximize asset value and replenish the pipeline. Lou is not a "new NHL" GM in that he moves at a glacial pace and was great back in the pre-Cap days when you could slowly build a roster. Now you need an active, intelligent GM who can constantly retool. IMO, anyway.It's pretty simple as far as I'm concerned, the people here who advocate for some kind of quick fix retool will always be content with the Islanders just being a playoff team. The people here who understand that a rebuild is necessary, and all of the time and pain and uncertainty that goes with it, will only be satisfied when the Islanders become a great team.
I don't think it's necessary to paint people with such broad strokes, just because not everyone is fully committed to a tear it down rebuild. There's lots of folks here who will only be content with the team being great but aren't necessarily in favor of trading pieces in their late 20's, like Barzal, Horvat and Sorokin for picks and prospects (those are the big pieces that I think would signal a full rebuild) to start a long and painful rebuild.It's pretty simple as far as I'm concerned, the people here who advocate for some kind of quick fix retool will always be content with the Islanders just being a playoff team. The people here who understand that a rebuild is necessary, and all of the time and pain and uncertainty that goes with it, will only be satisfied when the Islanders become a great team.