Roster Building XXIV: Our Hearts Go Pitter Pattersson

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Add to it that Nikishin comes in cheap. Everything can only flow after you have signed a goalie (which probably won't be as cheap as Freddie).

Playing GM:. Which free agent are you signing and for how much?:
View attachment 962663
There are a few really good or at least intriguing options on that list. Logan Thompson, Vejmelka, Lankinen, and Lindgren. I think it's a successful goalie offseason if we get one of those 4 guys. Of course the problem is that there are more than 4 teams looking for a goalie. I could see us ending up rolling the dice on trading a guy, like John Gibson at 50%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG
What about the Finn behind Ullmark in OTT? He’s getting some attention. (I admittedly don’t follow contracts/money/term) so not sure where he lands as a trade option.
 
There are a few really good or at least intriguing options on that list. Logan Thompson, Vejmelka, Lankinen, and Lindgren. I think it's a successful goalie offseason if we get one of those 4 guys. Of course the problem is that there are more than 4 teams looking for a goalie. I could see us ending up rolling the dice on trading a guy, like John Gibson at 50%.
Given competition for the scarce quality goaltender market and Canes preference for money-picking the position, I wonder if Canes would be moving forward with any of those four cited....going to be an interesting off-season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Discipline Daddy
There are a few really good or at least intriguing options on that list. Logan Thompson, Vejmelka, Lankinen, and Lindgren. I think it's a successful goalie offseason if we get one of those 4 guys. Of course the problem is that there are more than 4 teams looking for a goalie. I could see us ending up rolling the dice on trading a guy, like John Gibson at 50%.
I don't think Thompson gets to market, so looking Vejmelka, Lankinen, and Lindgren for non-Freddy options.

Just as big a priority is going to be getting a dman to play opposite Slavin though, it can't be Burns anymore.
 
This place is going to be feisty when we extend Freddy at $3M for two more years this July.
will it be more or less feisty if, at the draft, rumors float that the vehicles (car and van) are making a trade and after a longer than necessary period we finally get the big announcement: Demko with retention for a low pick and meh prospect.

honestly, demko was second in the vezina voting last year, yet he is a 'distressed' asset with injury history. picking him up for next year would be very, very canesy.
 
will it be more or less feisty if, at the draft, rumors float that the vehicles (car and van) are making a trade and after a longer than necessary period we finally get the big announcement: Demko with retention for a low pick and meh prospect.

honestly, demko was second in the vezina voting last year, yet he is a 'distressed' asset with injury history. picking him up for next year would be very, very canesy.
I said I thought as much in the Demko trade thread.

I could easily see it happening.
 
Yeah, just remember that the $3m AAV on Freddie is actually $4.5m because of the need for a reliable third option. Which makes you think maybe you should just spend $5m for your 1A, if he's out there.
the only one of those that's, maybe, available this offseason is Veg. Otherwise bringing it back with Freddy again and upgrading the #3 to say Reimer makes more sense.
 
will it be more or less feisty if, at the draft, rumors float that the vehicles (car and van) are making a trade and after a longer than necessary period we finally get the big announcement: Demko with retention for a low pick and meh prospect.

honestly, demko was second in the vezina voting last year, yet he is a 'distressed' asset with injury history. picking him up for next year would be very, very canesy.
I believe Demko has a brittle back/knee/hip which appears to be some type of chronic injury (I saw some posts that’s suggested he will just have to live with the situation going forward). After Freddie experience, I would think the Canes would pass on that type of player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WreckingCrew
Can’t believe people actually wanna bring back Freddie you gotta be crazy the guy plays 30 games a year if he’s lucky if he wants to make league minimum then sure but paying him another 3 million would be straight up foolish
 
Can’t believe people actually wanna bring back Freddie you gotta be crazy the guy plays 30 games a year if he’s lucky if he wants to make league minimum then sure but paying him another 3 million would be straight up foolish
In an ideal world we'd all like to move on from Freddie. But there are ~5 good goalies this off-season and a dozen teams who will look for upgrades in net. There's a chance we improve, and there's also a chance we start next year with a worse outlook in net. What we do have is cap space, so it'll be interesting to see if we do what other teams are doing and put lots of money down for a guy who looks like a starter but only with a season or two of work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WreckingCrew

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad