Speculation: Roster building thread XLIX ”U Can’t Always get what U Want”

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
He's probably talking about Zibanejad/Monahan. Someone from the Flames board came in here a few months ago suggesting something like that. However, I don't really consider that an upgrade for the Flames and Monahan has the better contract by virute of it lasting an extra year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mikos87
I’m guessing it involves an under-25 roster player we wouldn’t be excited to lose.... Chytil, Andersson, TDA, someone like that.

And of course then we’ve gotta see the return.
 
He's probably talking about Zibanejad/Monahan. Someone from the Flames board came in here a few months ago suggesting something like that. However, I don't really consider that an upgrade for the Flames and Monahan has the better contract by virute of it lasting an extra year.

I’m guessing it involves an under-25 roster player we wouldn’t be excited to lose.... Chytil, Andersson, TDA, someone like that.

And of course then we’ve gotta see the return.

Just think who do the rangers have that is currently an upgrade on monahan on paper.

It looks like you guys are all on the same page.

Really not sure how I feel about it
 
I can't see anyone on Calgary's roster worth trading for if we're the ones giving them an upgrade.
That's how I feel

We have hardly anything that is an upgrade over Gadreau/Monahan; would is be Kreider for Lindholm or Backlund?
 
I can't see anyone on Calgary's roster worth trading for if we're the ones giving them an upgrade.

They wouldn't trade their first at the deadline either. Just cause they like a guy doesn't mean they can afford the guy.

Last I checked, GMs dont make over the top trades unless they are getting a haul back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GeorgeKaplan
We were talking about the podcast a lot. Eventually the conversation lead us to the IHL and the Vegas Thunder :laugh:
Lol. BTW, I never really thanked your for the podcas. As a fan in Brazil, podcasts are basically the only way that I can listening to people talking about hockey, specially the Rangers, and yours podcast with Greg is great. Keep the good work!
 
They mentioned we want Calgary to add to what theyre offering and they dont want to, so what sort of 1:1 swap would be an upgrade for Calgary but not for us.

BTW I think this is entirely unrelated to what BBK and Edge were talking about today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mikos87
Lol. BTW, I never really thanked your for the podcas. As a fan in Brazil, podcasts are basically the only way that I can listening to people talking about hockey, specially the Rangers, and yours podcast with Greg is great. Keep the good work!

Thanks man. It's a fun new project we embarked on and people enjoying it is a great thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fvital92
Also, in a post from a day or two ago, @Edge said the Rangers have been talking to Arizona, Buffalo, Colorado, Dallas, Edmonton and Vegas. He's also said that Kreider, Buchnevich, Vesey and Namestnikov are players the Rangers are getting calls on. That should bring everyone up-to-date.
Thanks. I had dinner with a client and didn’t feel like reading all 12 pages.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad