Speculation: Roster Building Thread VI (2019/2020)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expecting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
Status
Not open for further replies.
A stint in the minors never stunted Larmer's career....I'm glad we sent a couple of the kids to the AHL . Hopefully they play a lot and have some guys watching out for them down there .

In many ways, it's too bad we only had Larmer for the last two years of his career and with a bad back.

I think he would've been one of the most loved players in franchise history had he spent his prime here.
 
Why is no one discussing the Hajek-Fox pairing? Putting two rookies out on defense together is a pretty controversial move, I'd ague more so than the differences between the third and fourth lines.

There will be growing pains. Obtaining the talent is a huge part of the rebuild while these kids need time to develop. Meanwhile, the total breakdown still hasn’t happened until a few more veterans are gone.
 
17-18? Well, I guess until McDonagh went out of the lineup. Full season, 16-17.
The difference between PK ice time for Staal and McDonagh is not as much as you think. I could have phrased that better.

The point is, we've always used him heavily and me suggesting that we will continue to do so is hardly an agenda against Staal.
 
My bad. I though you were saying that Stall would be a first line pairing Dman even strength.
I mean, he's gonna play a lot at even strength too lol

I don't like Marc Staal and that's not a secret, but saying the Rangers value him greatly is not part of the agenda. They absolutely do.
 
The difference between PK ice time for Staal and McDonagh is not as much as you think. I could have phrased that better.

The point is, we've always used him heavily and me suggesting that we will continue to do so is hardly an agenda against Staal.

It's exactly as much as a think (15-30ish seconds per game).
 
In many ways, it's too bad we only had Larmer for the last two years of his career and with a bad back.

I think he would've been one of the most loved players in franchise history had he spent his prime here.

When Andersson took #28 the first former Ranger I thought of was Larmer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edge
I dunno what kind of "concern" do we need to have?

If this was a contender I'd be real concerned. It's not...and both guys looked solid so far. Real NHL action will be different but they'll also get easy assignments and be sheltered. Sometimes they'll struggle I'm sure, but both guys look NHL ready so far so give them a shot. They can always be sent down later if necessary.
 
In many ways, it's too bad we only had Larmer for the last two years of his career and with a bad back.

I think he would've been one of the most loved players in franchise history had he spent his prime here.
I remember his first game back in Chicago as a Ranger; he was awarded a penalty shot, skated in and blasted a slapshot for a goal (vs Belfour I think). I believe he had two or three points in that game.
 
Couple of quick observations. seems like DeAngelo is gonna get paired with Staal. The way he has been playing lately I'm actually thinking he might be able to carry Staal on his back. Also means Staal stays in the top 4 unfortunately, but whatever at this point. Hopefully this is the last year of him being in the top 4 or even in the the top 6 D.

Also not a fan of Kakko on the second pp unit. With that first unit featuring Panarin/Zibby the second unit is probably gonna get 20-30 seconds and be lucky to even set up shop in the offensive zone. Would have been nice to see Kakko be given a chance to use his creativity/passing and amazing edge work in the offensive zone on the pp.
 
At a certain point (and yes, it's still early in his career) it has to manifest in games or it doesn't matter.
That certain point is a year or two from now which is why you're running into so much resistance being so adamant about his sucktitude right now

You're talking about "certain points" when we're literally a year or more away from that point.

That's why people maybe aren't showing you a lot of patience and they're "being mean" on this one

Well there you go
As for the Staal stuff. My only thing is that we're supposed to lose and the kids aren't ready. It doesn't matter. let Staal get eaten alive for another year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kendo and egelband
Everyone’s ‘hot take’ is a stolen soup from 15 other opinions.

Everyone’s ‘bold forecasts’ are the most conservative captain obvious calls.

Thursday can’t come soon enough.
 
If Howden had this ability to learn more effectively, maybe we would see some improvement? :dunno:

At a certain point (and yes, it's still early in his career) it has to manifest in games or it doesn't matter.

Ok, how about we try waiting for at least one regular season game then? Lias looked putrid the last two years, but now seems like he might be turning a corner. Could it be the same with Howden?

Rosters are fluid and lineup changes occur regularly. Why are some so bothered?

I don’t know if all moves were made to get the best current roster, or with an eye on giving certain players different development tracks for the intention of better long term success. I don’t know if they love Howden, or think Chytil would benefit greatly from playing all situations in the AHL? Which was a greater factor? I don’t know, but let’s see how things play out a bit first..
 
  • Like
Reactions: shinchanuuhh
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad