Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XXXXI

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s absolutely vital to get a tweener like Lehkonen ..
everyone penciling in kakko at 2nd line might me in for a surprise...
He hasn’t played in a while, and if his wrist is still a problem and hampers his production, he’ll likely find himself on 3rd line opposite Goodrow, as GG might make that his match up /shutdown line.
Getting a guy that can move up and down is critical

I was just thinking the other day. Kakko originally had a shorter return to play. Then they extended it an extra month and some here on HF were like wtf?

I wonder if they made the decision that they had enough of a cushion and were making ends meet without him that they gave him the extra time to come back 100% with no worries.

It's not a fsr fetched idea given his importance long term to the team, or, as a high powered trade chip in the summer for a guy like PLD. (not advocating that, just a for instance)

IMO, he comes back 100% and continues his accent in production he was building with Panna/Strome before Turk moved him to the 1st line to get Mika and Kreider producing 5v5. But now that Laf has cemented a spot there, KK can move back to 2RW with no reservations from the coaching staff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RangersFan1994
Because Lehkonen makes 2.3 mil and needs a new contract this summer. If both are on the team next year, then we have even less money for a center.

The simple solution then is to not sign Ryan Strome, and if having money for a C next season is an issue, moving out our one cheap center for a winger doesn’t help either.

I’m not sure what Lehkonen’s next deal will cost, but I cannot imagine he’ll be due that much of a raise. His agent is the same as Joel
Armis who signed a 4yr, $3.6M AAV deal. It’s not a direct comparison since Lehkonen still has an RFA year left, and I’d also imagine that the Rangers have inquired to see what his next deal will cost.

I’m not gung-ho on adding Lehkonen - or anyone that’s projected to be expensive for that matter - this deadline. I also think they’d be fools to trade Chytil when he’s having an obvious down year while playing largely with bad linemates that have no finishing talent. If they do move him, it should at least be for someone that can slot in long-term behind Mika, not for another W where they can fill in for cheap next year
 
Would love to just get Lehkonen at the deadline and bring back Kravtsov after his season is done.

The team's offense would improve GREATLY if we added those players, including getting Kakko back.

Kreider - Mika - Laf
Bread - Strome - Kakko
Kravt - Chytil - Lehkonen
Goodrow- Rooney- Reaves

Injury Depth: Hunt, Gauthier, Brodzinski, Barron
 
You just trade for him as a rental, give him a qualifying offer, and then trade him in the offseason. Not every player has to be a long term solution.

You give him a QO, then teams are going to bend us over because they know we can't afford him.
 
The simple solution then is to not sign Ryan Strome, and if having money for a C next season is an issue, moving out our one cheap center for a winger doesn’t help either.

I’m not sure what Lehkonen’s next deal will cost, but I cannot imagine he’ll be due that much of a raise. His agent is the same as Joel
Armis who signed a 4yr, $3.6M AAV deal. It’s not a direct comparison since Lehkonen still has an RFA year left, and I’d also imagine that the Rangers have inquired to see what his next deal will cost.

I’m not gung-ho on adding Lehkonen - or anyone that’s projected to be expensive for that matter - this deadline. I also think they’d be fools to trade Chytil when he’s having an obvious down year while playing largely with bad linemates that have no finishing talent. If they do move him, it should at least be for someone that can slot in long-term behind Mika, not for another W where they can fill in for cheap next year

Not re-signing Strome is already a given in this scenario. Maybe we can afford both Chytil and Lehkonen, and still add a 2C if we can trade Nemeth, but it will be tight.

Lehkonen has a 2.3 mil QO and he is arbitration eligible. He's probably looking at at least 3 mil. If we re-sign him, it's going to be for more than 1 year, so he'll be giving up at least 1 UFA year, which will drive up the cost.
 
Gallant be like: "You guys don't want to work during the game? Fine, my Uber is here anyway, see ya later."
iu
 
Not a bad offer for Gourde but he isnt a difference maker, he is a middle 6 center.

I couldnt disagree more with you on Larkin. He is the perfect fit. And from what @Edge has brought up in the past is that we are already looking to move one of trouba or Krieder to free up cap as soon as the following season. Schnieder steps into Troubas role and we can resign Larkin. Yes Trouba would have to accept the trade but just means he will have to accept where he is traded to. Larkin is doable and is better than Gourde and fits the team like a glove for now and the future.

How can Larkin be a perfect fit, when he in effect surely would be a 1 year rental if he comes here and plays well? We could only keep him if he comes here and busts. Its lose-lose to trade for Larkin.

Edit: Sorry for reading a bit fast, sure if we can trade Trouba. But that is a hypotetical to me that is very unlikely.
 
How can Larkin be a perfect fit, when he in effect surely would be a 1 year rental if he comes here and plays well? We could only keep him if he comes here and busts. Its lose-lose to trade for Larkin.

Edit: Sorry for reading a bit fast, sure if we can trade Trouba. But that is a hypotetical to me that is very unlikely.
Trouba or Kreider would be moved when he’s up for a new contract.

we have in house replacements for them. We don’t have a Larkin
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chalfdiggity3
You give him a QO, then teams are going to bend us over because they know we can't afford him.

I doubt it. If he's that in demand, which based on this deadline he seems to be, and multiple teams want him any team that lowballs just won't end up completing a trade. And if it does happen as you say and we lose him for near-nothing then it's no different than if he were a UFA rental in the first place. I'm not trading a 1st or the equivalent for him regardless so it's no big loss if that were to happen.
 
Yanni Gourde is signed for 3 more years at 5.166m per. He is 31 y/o. That couldn't matter less. With his motor, he isn't breaking down before he is 34 y/o. We can't afford an expensive player. If we get an established player now, that will require a new contract soon (like Larkin), we can't afford that player anyway. From my POV, Gourde makes a ton more sense than Larkin. Larkin has 1 more year before UFA. If we get him and he has a great year for us, then we will lose him for nothing. What good will that have done?

I would give up a bounty to get him with some retention from Seattle. I would do Filip Chytil, Nils Lundkvist and a 1st and more -- and not even think twice about it. No Laf, Kakko or Schneider. It is not about how good Gourde is, it is about how he is the perfect fit for us since he would be cost controlled, and with some retention, he is a steal.

Why is he a perfect fit for us?
(a) Both Ziba and Strome have the same issues. Neither covers a ton of ice, neither has that motor that is a constant threat at center ice pushing Ds back.
(b) He is the perfect center for someone like Kakko. He will draw attention and push Ds back, when Kakko can get the puck from a center like that he is lethal against a D on their heels.
(c) This makes perfect sense for us because we can have three elite lines. Both Tampa and Pittsburgh only won when they had three elite lines. Hagelin-Bonino-Kessel was literary the best line for Pittsburgh at times and Goodrow-Gourde-Coleman was tremendous for Tampa. We can have an elite line built around Kreider and Ziba, we can have an elite line built around Panarin -- but then what? Goodrow-Gourde-Kakko would be an elite line. That line has potential to be our best line at times without doubt. It would be great defensively, it would be great on the forecheck, it would be great on the counter attack. We don't only kill two birds with one stone, we kill three. We get another top line. We compliment the two top lines we have perfectly. And lastly, we sort out the log-jam we have giving Laf and Kakko a proper development environment, by creating another "top" development position for Kakko next to Gourde, but on the 3rd line.
(d) He is cost controlled and cheap for the duration of the flat cap era.

This team is a true contender:
Kreider-Ziba-Laf
Panarin-Strome-Hunt
Goodrow-Gourde-Kakko
Reeves-Rooney-Gauthier/Blais
Lindgren-Fox
K'Andre-Trouba
Nemeth-Schneider

After this year, we still have to replace Strome. But I am not worried, think Panarin will come back in better form next year and he has pushed so many centers over the edge so far. It might take some swings and misses, but we should be able to find someone who he can do that weith again.
I’d swap out Hunt For Kakko and put Lehkonen where Kakko is with Gourde and Goody.but I like it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ola
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad