I’m not 100% Down on chytil, but I think Barron is going be the better long term 3C. He’s smarter, bigger, and a better defender. He’ll also be cheaper, at least for a while.Details and facts. Bah. He's been here for more than two years and he isn't McDavid yet. The board has declared him boring, and wishes to elevate Barron to savior of the month.
Seriously, though, at no point, in the entire time he's been here, has Chytil had an extended run with consistent linemates who weren't 4th liners or AHL players. Some of you see "low hockey IQ"---I see a player who needs to act rather than over-think things. He's too tentative because the whole time he's been here, one mistake has meant being banished to 4th line minutes.
We never should have developed him in the NHL. He should have been a staple on the top line in Hartford until at least last year. He needs an extended run with players he won't defer to and get a chance to get on a roll. I'd put him with Laf and either Kakko or Blais, and roll with it for ~20 games.
Rangers are going to have to find a way. Having a gigantic hole at 2C isn't winning them any playoff series.Gallant compared Chytil to Lars Eller. Gallant was an assistant coach with Montreal with Eller. He was a valuable player/3rd line center on the Capitals when they won the Cup in 2018. Eller was a former first round by the Blues in 2007. Maybe Chytil won't be the answer for the Rangers 2nd line center issues. The Rangers need to fill that role but money is very tight.
He's also more physicalI’m not 100% Down on chytil, but I think Barron is going be the better long term 3C. He’s smarter, bigger, and a better defender. He’ll also be cheaper, at least for a while.
They both look to shoot the puck when they get it. Both have good wrist shots. Chytil is probably a bit faster with more shake n bake to his game, while Barron is more north/south /board work
How's Barron looked so far and what you expect him to be in the future?
To be fair, Hayes sucked so bad every time they tried to shift him to wing. He’d become flat out invisible.The org has just been headstrong on making him a center like they did with Hayes. They rarely give things like that up especially the the lack of c depth we have. I like chytil and he has tools but he doesn't effectly apply them consistently. I have no issues moving him in a deal that fits this team going forward.
Chytil and kravtsov is a good start for a package for a quality player...
I fixed that for youThat's actually a really good comp.
The 2C will need to be in house or a prospect. It could be someone like Barron or Goodrow.
That's why I also like Kravtsov for Hayton+
Still getting his feet wet at the NHL level but has looked solid. He's not going to be an offensive juggernaut but expecting 30-35 points at the NHL level while bringing good board play, PK time, the ability to play center ow wing and consistent physical play is going to be his calling card. Think Boone Jenner or Barclay Goodrow-like player.
You are not going to find a bona fide number two center for chump change. Strome could end up being the most efficient financial solution availableI just dont see the available cap space.. Even if he takes a RNH type deal.
I’d take a Boone Jenner type. I was hoping the Jackets would move him, underrated player. If he turns out to be a Andres Lee type down the road, I feel the offense will come. He seems like a very smart player and has shown offense at the AHL level, Rangers do well with late round picks. Still too early to tell.
I agree but it'd still take finagling to get him under the cap. Even if he comes in at $5.1M like RNH. It all depends on how Kakko and Blais play this season. If Kakko ( or Blais ) breaks out, we're worse off cap wise.You are not going to find a bona fide number two center for chump change. Strome could end up being the most efficient financial solution available
I think he's look real solid in his limited opportunity. 30-35 can change if he's playing with someone like Panarin. Stylistically, his game is reminiscent of PLD, no? He's big, is good on the forecheck, can skate well for his size, plays physical, is solid defensively and has a good shot. What more do we want?Still getting his feet wet at the NHL level but has looked solid. He's not going to be an offensive juggernaut but expecting 30-35 points at the NHL level while bringing good board play, PK time, the ability to play center ow wing and consistent physical play is going to be his calling card. Think Boone Jenner or Barclay Goodrow-like player.
Totally agree and there's not anything wrong with that.I've never been particularly enamored with Chytil's upside. I've always given him the benefit of the doubt because he's young. He looks like a 3C to me. I just don't see the overall hockey sense to become anything more offensively.
He can be a really good 3C, though.
This is why getting off to a good start and banking points early is very important this year, we could be dead in the water with a bad start.Our division is ridiculous.
The Metro division has only 4 regulation losses in 34 games played against other divisions this season. (23-4-7)
Goal differentials:
Metro +36
Atlantic -10
Central -23
Pacific -4
Teams .500 or above:
Metro: 8/8
Atlantic: 5/8
Central: 4/8
Pacific: 4/8
Our offense didn’t look great when Strome was playing either. And he was off to a horrid start defensively. If Panarin isn’t going then neither is Strome.Strome deserves more respect than he gets, our offense looks a lot less dynamic without him
I think he's look real solid in his limited opportunity. 30-35 can change if he's playing with someone like Panarin. Stylistically, his game is reminiscent of PLD, no? He's big, is good on the forecheck, can skate well for his size, plays physical, is solid defensively and has a good shot. What more do we want?
The faster GG realizes Strome can't play defense the better. He can't be trusted late in the game and he can't deal with the extra open ice in 4v4/3v3 situations.Our offense didn’t look great when Strome was playing either. And he was off to a horrid start defensively. If Panarin isn’t going then neither is Strome.
The bottom line is Panarin and Zibanejad need to get to going.
It’s hard to get in a rhythm with Reaves and McKegg only playing 7-8 minutes a night on 4th line. From what I’ve watched from him so far he’s solid. He pays attention to detail, throws his body around a bit. Everything you want to see. If he had some wings that could get him the puck in some prime shooting positions, we’d see that dirty wrister more often.How's Barron looked so far and what you expect him to be in the future?
Gotta get that shot volume up- NYR bottom of the league in shots per game to start the season.
That the PP which should, by the end of the season, be over 20% is currently 12.5 can get a lot of the blame.
As others have noted, there isn't a team in the metro right now below .500. WTF
You are not going to find a bona fide number two center for chump change. Strome could end up being the most efficient financial solution available